The New York Times prints an outstanding oped by Timothy Egan on "the exquisite irony of Newt Gingrich being destroyed by the very forces he unleashed — a smack-down that sets up 2012 as the year the moneyed elite learn to use the limitless power granted them by the Supreme Court."
Egan focuses on Gingrich and his affinity with Citizens United.
"Gingrich, for the last few years, has been partners in self-promotion with Citizens United, the group that prompted
the worst Supreme Court decision of the nascent 21st century (my emphasis), the one that granted “personhood” rights to corporations and green-lighted them to dominate American elections. More to the point, that 2010 case gave birth to shadowy super PACs that can annihilate a candidate, no holds barred, no responsibility to those pulling the strings."
As Gingrich rides into the sunset, ranting against the "negativity" and "corporate insiders" who funded the attacks against him, it is "we, the people" who are left with the dregs and his bitter remains.
And what dregs those will turn out to be.
Blame us: a compliant, passive public that elected a president, George W. Bush, who made the image of the US Supreme Court into the one now led by Chief Justice Roberts. You might hate the fact that politicians you once voted for, sent us on military ventures in Iraq and Afghanistan, costing American treasure and trillions at a time in our economic history when we could least afford to fail. If it were possible to be even more saddened at outcomes of elections, it would be through the distortions of democracy through Citizens United. (The future was outlined in the final, distracted voice of then-candidate Al Gore, warning voters in 2000 about the composition of the US Supreme Court should his opponent win.)
In a few weeks, the "Greek tragedy" of the Republican presidential primary will abate. A winner will emerge and then the real contest will begin: the avalanche of corporate money that will be unleashed through SuperPAC's against President Obama.
The inability to track SuperPAC money and donors hiding behind shields in real-time leads to serious misunderstanding by the public. While President Obama may appear to be raking in the cash from Democratic donors, on the SuperPAC front he is losing badly. My guess: Republican money could outweigh Democrat, through SuperPAC's, anywhere from ten to twenty times by November 2012.
The Fat Cats will have their day, but will they have the votes of the rest? (For the full NY Times OPED, click 'read more')