Showing posts with label Children's Trust. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Children's Trust. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 16, 2014

Locked out of my Miami Herald Account but still something to say. By Geniusofdespair

Why do I have to keep logging in? I forgot my password so I am locked out of the Herald for now.  Damn newspaper, you suck when you lock your PAPER subscribers out.

There are two letters to the editor of note. One is great, written by Former City of Miami Beach County Commissioner Nancy Liebman. The other sucks, written by David Lawrence who I personally have little respect for.  He wanted us to give more money to PAMM the art museum that the rich people were going to endow. Good luck on that David Lawrence, Jr.. You should pay more attention to what is going on at the Children's Trust which is slowly turning into a boondoggle.  It needs leadership and maybe an AUDIT. Yes an audit. It has public funds.  Get out of the business of endorsing stupid projects for us and getting us to spend money and get back to the Trust where you are squandering enough of our money.

Nancy Liebman:

Don’t create nightmare traffic a road to nowhere

Re the Sept. 6 article, Dolphin Expressway extension gets mixed reaction: In 2004 when the Miami-Dade Commission had an agenda filled with proposed developments to extend the Urban Development Boundary, a group called Hold the Line was organized and stopped the commission. I am proud to have been a leader as president of the Urban Environment League along with the Tropical Audubon Society, the Sierra Club, and hundreds of residents from the many communities that comprise Miami-Dade County. The Commission wisely stopped this attack on the natural environment of the western limits of the county.

Forgot my password, more than one way to skin a cat (oops all the cat lovers, it is just a saying, remember I have smokey the virtual cat as a pet)

Sunday, August 11, 2013

The Children's Trust, Spending our Money Wisely? Guest Blog by Child Advocate

July Trust Agenda

With all the nonsense going on in Miami-Dade county it is easy to forget the Children’s Trust and its own shenanigans.

If you aren’t familiar with the Trust, it is a governmental organization tasked in 1988 with the bringing services to the community via local small service providers who would know the needs of the grassroots community. At least that is how it was sold to the voters during the initial election campaign. Over the years, it has become a research organization that acts more like an agency providing services rather than a direct funder of other agencies. It has morphed into a tax-payer funded super agency that is political and controlling to the point of killing non-profits that were already serving the communities the Trust moved into.

In recent months, The Trust President-CEO, Modesto Abety-Gutierrez retired (after some internal upheavals) and the Trust went on a “national search” for new leadership. As it goes with most national talent searches, amazingly the board committee found the perfect President-CEO, Charles M. Auslander, already on their staff. Lord only knows how much taxpayer money was spent on that national search.

The Trust is famous for requiring organizations to create “service partnerships” which most agencies do with naturally without direct orders from their funders. Six years ago they required the artificial creation of service partnerships, then killed them three years later by defunding the partnerships, knowing that finding funding during the economic downturn would be nearly impossible.

Then almost immediately, the Trust revived the “service partnership” model and issued a new Proposal for Services and started the whole silliness of creating new partnerships where there had been some already in place and successfully servicing the local communities. Throughout this process, Charles Auslander was privy to the financial and emotional stress put on the agencies.

Auslander was put into place as President of the Trust on the second week of July 2013, and by the last week of July, his Trust had once again killed or almost killed numerous non-profits working in the South Dade area service partnerships. This time around it is even more disruptive to the recipients of the Truancy/family stabilization services provided through the service partnerships to the community and the high risk schools.

What the Trust has done is given Community Health of South Florida, an agency that has never done violence or truancy prevention over $950,000 (multiple millions, if one counts their other Trust contracts) to set-up a new service partnership to replace the ones that already had Trust trained staff performing the services. In fact, because CHI had never done this sort of work before, the Children’s Trust ordered CHI to use two new agencies as sub-contractors. Additionally, the Trust gave the City of Homestead an additional $400,000 to service the same Homestead/Florida City areas as CHI giving extra support to CHI, while dumping the two service partnerships already servicing those areas.

Why is CHI (Brodes Hartley, President) being funded if they can’t do the job without sub-contractors and why on earth, would the taxpayers want to pay CHI to manage a program that they aren't qualified to manage and usurp the case managers at the Children’s Trust? CHI is a medical provider to the community and public schools. Why are they getting an extra $950,000 to perform a contract that they can’t fulfill alone?

I think there is a political agenda here and it hurts the community and now out-of-work employees who were already trained and in place to handle the contract. The Children's Trust has invested time and money in non-profit staff training that is now thrown out the window.

This is a poor start to a new era at the Trust. The Children’s Trust continues to be politically self-serving with their policies and actions. This is not what the taxpayers voted for in 1988, nor is it what people voted for in 2010.

Wednesday, April 07, 2010

Children's Trust and House Bill 1227. Guest Blog by Child Advocate

House Bill 1227 requires that all of the Children's Services Councils (Children’s Trust included) to seek reauthorization from voters every six years. That would give the voters an opportunity to sunset the fund if the Trust doesn’t get back to the community basics.

As funding gets tighter for the community agencies, the Trust continues to develop their statistical research department. They are eliminating much needed services that do not fit into their bean-counting scheme. As a result, the Trust research department continues to focus on competing with research universities in the field of social science research, instead of being a funding source for true community based programming. This direction has taken on new life after the last election.

The Children’s Trust is urging their fans and funded agencies to call Tallahassee this week to speak AGAINST House Bill 1227. I agree, we should call but I think we should SUPPORT the bill. Children's Trust Advocacy Alert states the following examples of just a few reasons why this “unnecessary bill” (their words) attempts to fix a problem that does not exist:


* Local voters already approved the creation and reauthorization of our CSC, The Children's Trust, twice by large margins - in 2002 and again in 2008.

* Why single out only those special districts devoted to children for a referendum out of the more than 1,000 special districts in the state?

* We already have laws in place that allow for a referendum any time the county commission decides one is needed.

I believe the Children's Trust is methodically eliminating grass roots services agency by agency, moving towards the unannounced goal of bigger and fancier programs. If the community had wanted to have another United Way, it would have been much simpler to fund the existing United Way with the tax dollars instead of creating an entirely new empire. The Trust has lost the community-based services vision.

Unless this state legislative item passes, Miami-Dade County may never have another opportunity to retract the funding “in perpetuity” which The Children’s Trust now enjoys. The Trust is State funded and employees get State benefits.

I urge you to call Tallahassee this week, because the Children’s Trust, indeed any government agency, should not be funded without end, without accountability, with our tax dollars.

If you care to call Tallahassee to voice your opinion on the bill:

Please contact the bill sponsor, Committee Chair and the House Military and Local Affairs committee members.

Bill Sponsor: Debbie Mayfield, 850-488-0952, debbie.mayfield@myfloridahouse.gov

Committee Chair: Dorothy Hukill, 850-488-6653, dorothy.hukill@myfloridahouse.gov

House Military & Local Affairs Committee Members Contact Information

Dorothy Hukill, Chair

850-488-6653

dorothy.hukill@myfloridahouse.gov

Chris Dorworth, Vice Chair

850-488-5843

chris.dorworth@myfloridahouse.gov

Ron Schultz 850-488-0805

ron.schultz@myfloridahouse.gov

Esteban L. Bovo, Jr. 850-487-2197

esteban.bovo@myfloridahouse.gov

Juan C. Zapata 850-488-9550

juan.zapata@myfloridahouse.gov

John Wood 850-488-2721

john.wood@myfloridahouse.gov

Janet C. Long 850-488-6197

janet.long@myfloridahouse.gov

Janet Adkins 850-488-6920

janet.adkins@myfloridahouse.gov

Mack Bernard 850-488-8632

mack.bernard@myfloridahouse.gov

Keith Fitzgerald 850-488-7754

keith.fitzgerald@myfloridahouse.gov

Evan Jenne 850-488-0245

evan.jenne@myfloridahouse.gov

Mark S. Pafford 850-488-0175

mark.pafford@myfloridahouse.gov

Ronald Renuart 850-488-0001

ronald.renuart@myfloridahouse.gov

Charles E. Van Zant 850-488-0665

charles.vanzant@myfloridahouse.gov

Friday, January 29, 2010

Will Somebody Please Find a Volunteer for the Children's Trust Board? Guest Post by ChildAdvocate

In theory, this open seat on the Children's Trust Board should be a great opportunity to sneak someone on who is not a Children's Trust flunky.
 
However, my best guess is that you would have to be a Commission flunky to be selected. I don’t know which is worse. For the benefit of the children, I would suppose that a Commission flunky would be more effective because they don’t have to go along with the Board members who tend to fund themselves or their pals.
 
Has anyone else ever pondered the ethics of being funded by the Trust and sitting on the Board of Directors? The incestuous relationships are incredible. Very few of the Board members are not impacted by their Board actions. They either are paid by Trust monies or have dear friends who are, so their strategic plans for the Trust are critical to their own future.

Too bad that we have no control over this run-away tax-funded organization. The Children's Trust is another Fairchild Tropical Garden style Board running amok with their own agenda, forgetting about the needs of the taxpayers who lavishly fund them. What is it with big boards and non-profits?


Monday, September 21, 2009

The Children’s Trust Final Budget Hearing, TODAY. Budget Weak on Details. By ChildAdvocate

This is a line item on your tax bill folks - the Children's Trust is a taxing entity subject to a public hearing!

The Trust is having their final hearing TODAY. They voted at last Monday’s hearing held in downtown Miami to raise taxes! Namely to raise the millage to .5000 mills. The Trust Board claims that if they had held the millage at the same rate, they would have to discontinue another 16 million dollars worth of services.

Look at the graphic, one has to wonder if they accomplished all the budget cuts they could have. Items worth noting:

1. Professional Services – I would think that they would have enough experience on staff that they should not need consultants. As far as outside attorney’s go, WHY?? Maybe they need their own legal staff. How many of the staff they have laid off are coming back as consultants?

2. The staff should be limiting their travel and cell phone use. They don’t have to drive to every meeting of which they get notice. They certainly don’t need to be flying about the country until the budget looks less grim.

3. The Trust could operate with less “give away” advertising gimmicks such as pencils and t-shirts. They have a traveling bus, but it most likely is hidden in the cost of the contracted programs. Actually, what does the trust spend on their own programming?

4. Capital expenditures: The Trust laid off staff and then they do computer upgrades? Is updating the computers and software something that is critical at this juncture? The number of programs they are tracking has declined, the number of children serviced has changed and the actual staffing numbers changed for the Trust, yet they are making quite an investment in computer hardware.

It was interesting to see the tax collector gets his share. Is that double taxation for the population? The taxpayers pay the tax collector to maintain the state/county’s tax collecting ability and then pay them again to pay our taxes to the people where they belong? Think about the Trust paying the Tax Collector over a million dollars to forward the taxes collected to their bank account. Then multiply that times collection fee for each entity on your tax bill. Good business for the tax collector; bad for the community.

If you decide to go the final meeting, it is MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 21, 2009, at 5:00 P.M., on the Miami Dade College’s Downtown Wolfson Campus. Go to Building 2, room 2106 on the first floor. Bring a barf bag.

Friday, May 22, 2009

Children’s Trust New Chair has Connections --- HealthConnections. By ChildAdvocate

The Children's Trust’s newly elected chair is Citrus Health Network’s COO, Maria Alonso.

The real news is not Ms. Alonzo’s election, but the fact the Trust Board elected someone to be Chairperson who represents an agency that is funded as one of the providers of the Trust's HealthConnect programs (and other programming). What more does the Trust Board have to do to result in a conflict of interest for the Children’s Trust?

I wonder, is it fair for other agencies to have to compete against Citrus Health for Children’s Trust funding? It must stink to be them. While we are thinking about competing for dollars...
How about the Citrus Health service activity numbers? Is Citrus Health meeting the contract goals for participation or are they doing contract revisions to shore up their new President’s numbers? The Trust auditors and contract managers will be stepping lightly around that agency’s offices.

Does this election show why the Children’s Trust dollars are going to pregnant women and public school clinics and not into after school programs and summer camps?

Now that funding is permanent, has the Trust done a bait and switch on taxpayers, shifting around their focus and funding?

Monday, March 23, 2009

The Children’s Trust: Defensive about its Programs? Guest Blog By ChildAdvocate

Following right on the heels of Eye on Miami’s blog about the Trust and its HealthConnect in the Schools’ program, comes this FULL-page ad touting the Children's Trust’s HealthConnect in the Community. This advertisement (1/2 of it is at left, the rest - hit read more) could be either defensive tactics, poor timing for the ad or plain old in-your-face arrogance in response to the blog post. Most of all: The ad is a waste of tax dollars.

Just the fact that the Trust ran a full-page ad in the Miami Herald about their own program is enough to make us wonder about their priorities during dismal financial times. Of course, maybe the Trust has a sugar-daddy at the Herald or on their Board of Directors to fund these things. Nevertheless, with a public relations budget of over 4 million, they can afford full-page ads in the paper without much help from their fans. What gets me mad:

Why do they need a 4 million dollar public relations budget if they are doing everything right? Maybe because they are doing some things wrong?

The Children’s Trust was created to fund community agencies in the county; not create their own programs to fund. “Fund community agencies” being the operative phrase.

This wonderful little HealthConnect program carries a price tag of $3,890,081 as in their posted September 2008 budget briefing papers. While again, one would have to acknowledge that it is a great little program, one still has to consider whether it reaches enough individuals to make it a valid funding priority when Trust-funded “Out of School” programs (after school care and day camps) are being hacked or provided funding for less children this year.

Which program produces more bang for the buck, HealthConnect or after school programs and day camps?

Our community knows which program eases the load on the shoulders of the working caregivers of children and caregivers seeking to get out the unemployment lines. It shouldn’t take the creation of a statistical development team for the Children's Trust to know it. On the other hand, the Trust may know intrinsically which is more important at the breadwinner level, however getting them to acknowledge it is a whole other issue.

In the end, the reality of the community’s most relentless needs will reflect in a tally of new latch-key kids on the streets and the statistical rise in juvenile delinquency rates in our community. Of course, these numbers would be in spite of innovative (misguided?) Children’s Trust programs that offer guidance to adults while pregnant. Go figure.

I guarantee no one is tracking latch-key kids and any upward changes in juvenile delinquency rates reported by law enforcement will be a function of grim economic times, and not due to programmatic choices made by the Children’s Trust.

Monday, March 16, 2009

Counting Lives: The Children’s Trust Miscalculates. Guest Blog by ChildAdvocate

Will someone please tell me: When did we vote to have the Children's Trust subsidize the public school system: Offering "HealthConnect" Health care services in schools at the expense of summer and after-school programs?

In 2008 the citizens of Miami-Dade County voted on a public tax referendum that saved the Children’s Trust from oblivion. The Trust is funded by a percentage of the property tax collected. During the height of the housing bubble years the Children’s Trust had some serious money to throw into community programs for children, in fact, nearly 150 million dollars. The Trust vote giving them permanent existence was good news or should have been, then the housing bubble burst.

Just prior to the 2008 election, the inner bowels of the Trust were rumbling. Staff members were afraid of losing the election and their jobs; they were defensive and at times, nasty with the service providers that they over saw. Board Members were out pounding the pavement doing “public education” to make sure the tax proposal passed, careful not to “lobby” the cause. Much to their relief, the referendum passed overwhelmingly: the politics were over but something else was brewing...

The undercurrent of agitated nervousness still pervades the 8th floor of the Trust. Contract managers are arrogant, frazzled and reconsidering careers. The funded providers are laying off employees, many agencies are facing funding cuts of 50% or more. The funding of the Trust slid right into the toilet along with the building industry. Foreclosures are creating disaster in the Children’s Trust bank accounts. The Board is in the middle of a transition and powerful David Lawrence, Jr. is no longer in control. Priorities are changing and the funding from property taxes has plummeted from nearly 150 million dollars to an expected low in the range of 90 million this coming year.

The Trust is hunkering down and heading into the storm in a big way. The Trust management bravely told staff to cut a million dollars of their own budget. To be honest, if the Trust cut their advertising and public relations costs, they would be beyond that figure. (They are budgeted $ 4,411,382 for 2008-2009) Take a look at “Contact Us” on their website to get an idea of the number employees in their fiefdom.

Dread is escalating among the service providers. Whose boat gets sunk in the coming storm? Which children’s programs will be cut? Some of the programs are favored and protected. Like the Children’s Trust public school health care (HealthConnect in Our Schools). This is part of the Trust’s agenda to put health care back in schools.

As background, consider that their school health care program requires a staff that includes a nurse, social worker and aide for every team. Each team has 2 schools assigned to them. A team costs about $187, 500 per year in salaries (probably more in today’s economy). According to a previous team worker, if they see 10 children a day, it would be a good day.

Now, reflect on this fact, the Trust still has to get rid of children’s programs to hit their amended budget. According to their 2008 budget, they had about 45,000 children in afterschool programs and summer camps. That is one astounding number of children who get services every day of the school year and into summer. Their “out-of-school” programs were funded at $33,977,625 which represents a decrease of $2,497,297 (7%) in the 2008-2009 budget from the previous year, without any additional budget adjustments that may have since occurred. More funding cuts for those programs are coming within the next few months.

Is the Trust Board of Directors missing the boat?

The actual numbers do not justify dumping the services to many of the 45,000 children who receive much needed afterschool and summer camp care, while increasing or holding firm funding for a HealthConnect program serving a relatively small number of students in school health clinics (Let’s be generous, 10 children a day times 167 schools?). Forget about the “studies“ that the Trust uses to justify the HealthConnect program, over the need for preventing latch-key children.

The Trust will spend almost $17 million implementing the health initiative in the first Miami-Dade schools. How much does it cost to train clinic aides or volunteers to triage and determine whether the child needs to be referred to doctors, social services, or 911? Additionally, they have other HealthConnect programs outside the schools that are not included in that 17 million, but in all probability are duplicated services provided by other community service providers. (at 6 million in additional costs).

Will someone please tell me, when did we vote for the Trust to provide direct services and maintain a child research division? When did we vote to have the Trust subsidize the public school system?

The Trust funded agencies are not the only ones caught in the storm; here’s your personal storm warning:

Take serious note of the fact that all children’s after school and summer camps are in serious danger. You will be scrambling to find ANYONE to offer those services at a reasonable cost if the Trust Board of Directors moves forward with the health care in the schools, as well as their December 2008 determination to focus the majority of their other funding on ages 0-5.

Call the Children’s Trust and talk about funding cuts and your real needs. Do it today!

Tuesday, August 19, 2008

The Children's Trust Miami Revisited. By Geniusofdespair

I am getting the feeling that the Children's Trust supporters are afraid of any questions at all about the Trust. I don't mean to upset your apple cart. I was undecided about financing the Children's Trust in my endorsement so I tried to open a dialogue, airing my concerns with the PAC. I really didn't have many concerns with the Trust itself. Yes, I don't like that Board Members can get contracts with the Trust but my displeasure is mostly with people/politicians who have under-funded schools and the pillars of the community who don't seem to care as much about that as they care about the Trust.

For instance, it was a poor choice on the part of The Children's Trust to put a picture of Marco Rubio, as a supporter, in the newspaper.

This is the same Marco Rubio who was the Speaker of The House during the massive tax cut to public schools. Is that insane to anyone else but me? It left a bitter taste in my mouth.

The School Board and the Superintendent are battling it out and teachers' salaries suffer, but hey, it is okay, Marco supports taxing us for the Trust...just not for schools.

Look, I don't care one way or the other whether you get the $100,000,000.00 (I noticed the percentage increased) Children's Trust. I just don't like the way you are pushing it with photos while our schools are hurting. Put some meat in your ads because we all know the Herald will not give us honest dialogue with Lawrence at the helm of The Children's Trust.

Saturday, August 16, 2008

The Miami Children's Trust: Political Action Committee by Geniusofdespair

(excuse the repost trying to cleanse this blog)

This is the PAC that is spending money trying to get you to approve the Children's Trust Referendum on the ballot August 26th. Their mandate is due to expire, they want to be renewed: Thus the PAC.

Some big donors: Lennar has given them $50,000 and Stuart Miller (Lennar CEO) has also given the Children's Trust Miami PAC $50,000. AT&T has given them $50,000 as well. David Lawrence also gave his baby a bundle. A host of good people have given to this PAC (Katy Sorenson, Donna Shalala, State Rep. Julio Robaina, Betsy Kaplan, Joe Natoli, Carlos Gimenez, etc.) to the tune of over a million dollars.

What I would like to know: Where were all these people and corporations (663 of them) when they cut the education budget? Why didn't they step in to help public schools with the bully pulpit? Why didn't they scream like hell? And, secondly, why should we foot the bill twice for education, these programs could be added to the Miami Dade education umbrella and they could get the money from the referendum. Why have two large staffs? I would rather money go directly to the school budget. This PAC, it irks me big-time, hell, they spent about $200,000 just on polling to find out how they can sell us on this. They even polled us to see what the ballot language should look like.

Since we have given The Children's Trust about $85,000,000 a year (2007-08 $99.3 million based on a 0.4223 mill property tax) I thought we should look at them a little closer.

Here is a link to The Children's Trust budget information (you can also hit on image on right for a brief summary from a 2007 audit) and following is the language that will be on the ballot (that we voters chose in two polls costing $25,000) and, finally, is the Staff list of the Children's Trust:

Shall The Children’s Trust, the independent special
district for children’s services, be renewed to fund
improvements to children’s health, development and
safety including:
• programs to reduce violence and keep children safe,
• after-school and summer programs,
• programs to improve the educational quality of
child care, and
• health care teams for public schools; and promote
parental and community responsibility for children;
and continue the annual ad valorem tax levy not to
exceed one-half (½) mill?

Staff by Department
ADMINISTRATION
Staff Member Title Extension/Phone
Modesto E. Abety President / CEO 244
Susan Marian Senior Executive Assistant 325
Charles M. Auslander Chief Programs and Operations Officer 236
Lissette E. Martinez Executive Assistant 291
Muriel Jeanty Clerk of the Board 292
Yurena Driggs Receptionist 301

FINANCE & ACCOUNTING
Jolie Jerry Chief Financial Officer 322
Andrea Roberts Executive Assistant 315
Wendy Duncombe Controller 320
Maria Elena Cadavid Fiscal Analyst III 307
Alberoni Dorvilus Fiscal Analyst 309
Brenda L. Galarza Senior Accountant 330
Fred Torres Senior Accountant 316
Goran Omerhodzic Staff Accountant II 304
Jay Mayer Staff Accountant II 303
Kenneth Freimark Staff Accountant II 268
Perla Zepeda-Young Staff Accountant II 312
Chareka Hawes Staff Accountant 321
Kesha (Tarquisha) Davis Accounting Clerk II 311
Yoanka Cobas Accounting Clerk II 312
Juana Lartitegui Accounting Clerk 314
Mariela Carrodeguas Accounting Clerk 241

EARLY CHILDHOOD (0-5) AND MATERNAL HEALTH DEVELOPMENT
Bevone Ritchie Contract Administrator 318
Countess Chapman-Balogun Contract Manager 265
Hudelaine R. Deus Contract Manager 287
Kathleen Dexter Contract Manager 286
Sara Espinoza Contract Manager 266
Viviana Moncada Administrative Assistant II 267

HEALTHCONNECT
Dr. Andrew L. Brickman Executive Director, Health Programs 240
Shaleen Fagundo Senior Program Manager 239
Helen Matos-Alvarez Contract Manager II 308
Dannielle M. Hart Contract Manager 294
Juliette Fabien Contract Manager 293
Michele Jubilee Administrative Assistant II 290

SERVICE PARTNERSHIPS / RESOURCE NETWORKS / VIOLENCE PREVENTION
Donovan Lee-Sin Sr. Manager for Community & Neighborhood Services 231
Glory Coley Contract Administrator 319
John Ise Contract Manager 253
Lorraine Gary Contract Manager 246
Rachel Spector Contract Manager 248
Safiyé González Administrative Assistant II 295

OUT OF SCHOOL (OOS) 1
Ana D. Sanchez Contract Administrator 257
Armando H. Corbelle Contract Manager 254
Danny Roman-Gloro Contract Manager 247
Josefina Gallardo Contract Manager 259
Marisela De D'Windt Contract Manager 256

OUT OF SCHOOL (OOS) 2
Kathleen Gent Contract Administrator 245
Garnet Esters Contract Manager 310
Gilberto Gonzalez Contract Manager 255
Ive Vintimilla Contract Manager 260
Patricia Leal Contract Manager 306

YOUTH DEVELOPMENT / TRANSITION TO ADULTHOOD / ADVOCACY
Samuel McKinnon Contract Administrator 262
Allen Sells Contract Manager 285
Aundray Adams Contract Manager 252
Rick Hernandez Contract Manager 310
Robert Feiler Contract Manager 264
Jenny Bode Administrative Assistant 242

QUALITY RATING IMPROVEMENT SYSTEM (QRIS) & QUALITY COUNTS
Dr. Jesse Leinfelder Administrator 238
Jessica Grinovero Program Assistant 289

CAPACITY BUILDING
Blanch (Theresa) Johnson Contract Manager 225
Cravel Holmes Contract Manager 263
Meredith Sofka Contract Manager 298
Sabine Edmond Program Assistant 268

TRAINING
Dr. Tisa McGhee Professional and Organizational Development Manager 233
Emilio de la Cruz Capacity Training Specialist 227

INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Dr. Debra Davis Chief Information Officer 517
Erik Pinzon IS Manager 525
Yilin Xiao Systems Analyst / Computer Services Specialist 521
Pablo Delgado Systems Analyst 522
Alfonso Arias-Mendoza Database Administrator 526
Robert Bethke IT Documentation and Training Specialist 523
Darrin Buffkin Community Indicators & GIS Analyst 225
Margo Brownlee Administrative Assistant 519

PUBLIC POLICY & COMMUNICATIONS
Diana Ragbeer Director of Public Policy & Communications 511
Emily Cardenas Senior Communications Manager 516
Sandra Camacho Media Liaison 508
Persephone Gary Public Policy & Outreach Coordinator 515
Michael Malone Writer/Editor 510
Felix Becerra Web Content Manager 509
Ernie Lyman Administrative Assistant II 507
Laura Costanzo Executive Assistant / Public Policy 527

CONTRACT PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION
Deborah Robinson Sr. Program Services Manager
(TEAMS: Sanchez, Gent, McKinnon) 237
Loretta Duvall Sr. Program Services Manager
(TEAMS: Ritchie, Wimes, McGhee) 317
Ernesto Perez Contract Manager II 247
Joanna Revelo Contract Manager II 249
Lisete Yero Office Manager 288

RESEARCH & EVALUATION
Dr. K. Lori Hanson Director of Research and Evaluation 224
Dr. Lisa Pittman Sr. Research and Evaluation Analyst 317
Dalia Garcia Sr. Research and Evaluation Analyst 232
Stephanie Scott Resource Development Manager 506
Sharon DeJoy Research & Evaluation Manager 228
Sandra Alvear Research & Evaluation Analyst 241
Sandra Williams Research & Evaluation Analyst 228
Marden F. Muñoz Data Integrity Analyst 223
Johana Cure Research Assistant 226
Teresa Cobb Administrative Assistant I 288

HUMAN RESOURCES & LEGAL
Bob Bromberg HR Consultant - Fax: 305-358-9615 305-373-7700
Maria Arista-Volsky Assistant County Attorney 305-375-2209

BOARD CHAIR
David Lawrence Jr. The Early Childhood Initiative Foundation
3250 SW Third Avenue
Miami, FL 33129

Friday, August 15, 2008

Be Careful Who You Get to Endorse Your Candidate or Your Issue. By Geniusofdespair

There are a lot of people who don't like the community leaders around town. For instance, I don't like Marco Rubio and also I am not a big fan of lobbyist and Democratic money-man Kris Korge. I also don't like the Mayor of Hialeah mixing his business deals with the government. So when I see this endorsement crap with these three on it, it makes me not want to vote for the issue: In this case the Children's Trust, for which I am still on the fence.

The same goes for Candidate endorsements. They can kill your chances.

So, my advice is don't use unpopular or controversial people for endorsements, it will backfire.

Friday, November 23, 2007

David Lawrence's Children's Trust: What's Up? By Geniusofdespair

I have three questions:
1. Why did the Children's Trust form a Political Action Committee in March '06? A PAC is not a non-profit.
2. Why did the Gloria Estefan Foundation take back $25,000 in March '07?
3. Why did the Children's Trust PAC pay $20,000 for a poll in April '07?

Anyone have answers? Are they going for some legislation? (Hit on image to enlarge)