Showing posts with label Water Quality/Supply. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Water Quality/Supply. Show all posts

Friday, July 06, 2018

Bill Nelson: Our Choice for Senator. By Geniusofdespair


I have heard Senator Bill Nelson speak a number of times. He is not a great speaker. He has that laid back Florida twang as a Northerner, I don't quite get.

I have also heard his evil Republican opponent speak and he is worse. That is why Rick Scott is just running negative ads against Bill Nelson. Scott can't speak at all without stuttering through his speech. I guess that is why he pleaded the 5th amendment 75 times. He is just not a speaker.

Rick Scott can claim victory for his two runs for Governor by running more ads. Effective ads. Is that what you want? A Senator who relies on his own money (that he got dubiously) to run ads?

Bill Nelson was born in Florida and has lived here his whole life. Is he smart? What do you think. You have to be damn smart to be an astronaut and in great physical shape.


Rick Scott, born in Illinois (the evil opponent) was pressured to resign as chief executive of Columbia/HCA in 1997, amid a controversy over the company's business and Medicare billing practices. During his tenure as chief executive, he oversaw the company while it defrauded Medicare, Medicaid and other federal programs. The Department of Justice ultimately fined the company in what was at the time the largest health care fraud settlement in U.S. history.

Now Florida is facing one of its biggest catastrophes with the Algae blooms on both coasts. How does Rick Scott have anything to do with that? He made appointments to all the Water Management District Boards. Here is the mission of the Board:
To manage and protect South Florida's water resources by balancing and improving flood control, water supply, water quality and natural systems.

Here is the background of some of Rick Scott's appointees - as you can see they are NOT uniquely qualified to make the decisions based on the Mission:

• Member, Florida Farm Bureau's Statewide Equine Industry Advisory Board, Member, Florida Farm Bureau's Young Farmer and Rancher Leadership Program, Board Member, The Children’s Healing Institute, Former Member, Western Palm Beach County Farm Bureau Board of Directors... Appointed By: Governor Rick Scott

• Director of Community and Government Relations for Lipman Family Farms...Appointed By: Governor Rick Scott

• Attorney Partner: Reed, Griffith & Moran...Appointed By: Governor Rick Scott

• Co-founder and Vice President of Entic, Inc (Real Estate Firm)....Appointed By: Governor Rick Scott

• Title Agent, Attorney's Title Fund/Old Republic National Title Insurance Company ...Appointed By: Governor Rick Scott

And with the crew he appointed - supporting the polluters of Lake Okeechobee - here is what we have now on the coasts:





We have a Governor who cares more about the Sugar Industry, ignoring their pollution, than he does about Florida water so people can safely recreate in and around it and for fish to flourish. Don't vote for Rick Scott.

Friday, January 13, 2017

Senator Joe Negron and the last, best chance for taxpayers and voters to escape the mismanagement of Florida's waters ... by gimleteye


The big controversy in the Florida legislature this session is Senate president Joe Negron's effort to fund the acquisition of 60,000 acres of land now in sugarcane production. Although a bill has not been publicly released, there is speculation whether his plan will be approved by the Florida legislature and Gov. Rick Scott.

It is a battle royale because the acquisition frames a central issue for one of the nation's most politically important states: who controls water? The paradox is that whatever the outcome,  Big Sugar comes out the winner. In the current status quo, Big Sugar calls the shots. It is spending a fortune to stop Senator Negron's initiative, including a continuous blizzard of PR tactics, but the moment Big Sugar can extract the MAXIMUM offer by the state for their lands, the golden spigot will shut off.

In the meantime, most media reports lose focus on the fact that this isn't a new battle. Efforts by environmentalists to re-arrange South Florida's water management infrastructure and equitably serve the needs of the economy and the environment have stretched out for so many decades that public attention has tended to wander, "I thought we saved the Everglades."

Despite billions spent, it is not true. Florida's political and economic status quo incentivize all the wrong policies instead of positive steps based on sound science. To prove this point, consider one of Big Sugar's principal allies: the state's largest electric utility, Florida Power and Light.

FPL is pushing hard for final permitting to build two new nuclear reactors at its Turkey Point facility in Homestead. In October 2016, according to Barry White of the Citizens Alliance for Safe Energy, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission approved " ... a plan to inject toxic chemicals and liquid radiological waste (radwaste) from the reactors into the Boulder Zone at 3,000 feet into the Floridan Aquifer on the assumption that it is hermetically sealed and the waste water would stay there forever."

This "plan" resembles in its key aspects one of Big Sugar's central delaying tactics in the multi-decadal fight to maintain its prerogatives. Like FPL, Big Sugar also supports using underground aquifers that connect to the drinking water supply serving millions of Floridians and visitors in order to avoid fully accounting for the cost of its pollution.

In the case of Big Sugar, the pollutant is excess fertilizer including highly toxic chemicals added by industry to its waste stream. Its plan is to dump "excess" water into aquifer storage and recovery wells; an engineering strategy the late John Marshall, founder of the Arthur Marshall Foundation, called, "vertical parking lots".

Regarding FPL's planned aquifer destruction, CASE tried to offer the Nuclear Regulatory Commission evidence of connectivity and permeability between all levels and areas of the Floridan Aquifer and all other parts of the 4,000 square mile Biscayne Aquifer in South Florida. White writes, "Putting billions of gallons of toxic chemicals and radwaste with tritium, cesium and Strontium 90 into the deep aquifer presents irreversible pollution with potentially irreversible dire consequences."

The same happened to environmentalists complaining that the 2000 Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) called for the massive use of ASR wells; some three hundred were included in the original $7 billion CERP. At the time, the USGS, nation's foremost science agency charged with sorting out the public interest in underground aquifers, was not even consulted.

The following is from a 2015 USGS report:
Recent studies by the U.S. Geological Survey of seismic-reflection profiles acquired in onshore canals and offshore in Biscayne Bay and the Atlantic continental shelf have indicated the presence of tectonic faults (one strike-slip fault and multiple reverse faults) and karst collapse structures, and these studies substantiate the utility of this approach for locating feasible vertical-fluid flow pathways. The strike-slip fault and karst collapse structures span confining units of the Floridan aquifer system and could provide high permeability passageways for groundwater movement. If present at or near wastewater injection utilities, these features represent a plausible physical system for the upward migration of effluent injected into the Boulder Zone to overlying U.S. Environmental Protection Agency designated underground sources of drinking water in the upper part of the Floridan aquifer system. ("Seismic-Sequence Stratigraphy and Geologic Structure of the Floridan Aquifer System Near “Boulder Zone” Deep Wells in Miami-Dade County, Florida", USGS in cooperation with Miami-Dade Water and Sewer)
John Marshall, in the 2000's, served on the South Florida Water Management District's advisory board, called the Water Resources Advisory Committee. Marshall was a fierce and persistent advocate for additional land acquisition in the Everglades Agricultural Area during these years. Today, the WRAC is stuffed with Big Sugar mouthpieces, lobbyists, and friends of Gov. Rick Scott. The WRAC, as a result, is providing cover for the state water management district to oppose Senator Negron's acquisition plan. "Stay the course" including the reliance on underground aquifers through ASR wells.

In May 2015, the following was published in Journal of Geography and Geology (Vol.7, No. 2):
The available evidence, including comparisons of chloride concentrations for injected and “recovered” water, confirm that ASR has not fulfilled ASR proponents’ claims as a means of “storing” or “recovering” water injected into the aquifer, a “new water supply” and groundwater “recharge” alternative, or a potential solution to the eutrophication of Lake Okeechobee and the Everglades. Consequently, ASR wells simply function as additional “disposal” and water supply wells, without providing any additional aquifer capacity to support those groundwater withdrawals. Claims that “performance” of ASR improves after multiple cycles, or long-term injections are based solely on the ability to force larger volumes of water into the aquifer at a given well location. This phenomenon is the result of severe erosion and/or dissolution of the aquifer matrix comprising the structural component of the aquifer and meets the USEPA’s definition of fracking. ("Fractures as Preferential Flowpaths for Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) Injections and Withdrawals: Implications for Environmentally Sensitive Near-Shore Waters, Wetlands of the Greater Everglades Basin and the Regional Karst Floridan Aquifer System", Sydney T. Bacchus et al)
The State of Florida approved the siting of FPL's new nuclear reactors, gliding past economic facts Gov. Scott didn't like and a dangerous reliance on underground aquifers that he did like. He is doing the same, with Big Sugar. Both rely on deliberately misreading or denying science and fact.

Big Sugar depends on subsidies embedded in the Farm Bill, and who knows what the incoming Trump administration will say about those. No one is asking Big Sugar to walk away from 60,000 acres without fair compensation. No one is asking local communities to surrender jobs, without planning and investment for future opportunities. What Senator Negron has proposed is to fix Florida's water future and a foundation built at a time by decision makers who bought into false promises and bad science. This is the last, best chance to reverse that unfortunate course.

Wednesday, September 14, 2016

Update on yesterday's post on State's Increase of Toxic Chemical Levels in Water Bodies. By Geniusofdespair

 The administrative law judge ruled THE SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA; CITY OF MIAMI; FLORIDA PULP AND PAPER ASSOCIATION ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS,INC.; AND MARTIN COUNTY had no standing to object to the rule change for water quality standards as they missed the deadline. What crap. You might wonder why Pulp and Paper is there. They want even more lenient toxic chemical standards and would like time to argue for that.  (Link to yesterday's post). Excerpt from yesterday's post (unfortunately the outcome was not good):
The hearing on DEP’s efforts to dismiss all four petitioners who are challenging the proposed human health based toxics criteria was held last Wednesday and did not disappoint us in any way. Judge Canter with the Division of Administrative Hearings did his best to get all the legal arguments and factual information out on the table so he can go off in a quiet corner of his office (I’m guessing here) and try to sort it all out and make some sense of it.

After three hours of mostly intelligent discussion, the judge ruled that the case is on hold (abated) until he issues a written order on DEP’s motions to dismiss.
Here is how the judge summed it up:

Judges order of dismissal
In the judges footnotes he noted this...was this a flaw in the petitioners argument that could have changed the outcome?

Tuesday, September 13, 2016

Gov. Rick Scott: His Florida Department of Environmental Protection's Rat Nest ... guest blog


Gimleteye note: By "pulp and paper industry", read: Koch Brothers' industrial enterprises in Florida. Read: Gov. Rick Scott, who is micromanaging the effort to weaken protections due all Floridians. Believe it:

From Linda Young, Florida Clean Water Network:
... in short, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection has fumbled (this) rulemaking so badly, that there is no precedent. Our state agency, which we all pay for through our taxes, has either purposely or accidentally created a tangled web around a very important issue – whether or not our state government will be allowed to significantly increase the amount of toxic chemicals – many of them carcinogenic – that big polluters (such as the pulp and paper industry and many others) can dump in our water. Whether through incompetence or deliberate deceit, our governor and his agency are doing everything in their power to force these chemicals on us, our wildlife, and our future. THIS IS WRONG!!!

Florida Clean Water Network -September 12, 2016

DEP’S RATS NEST

Dear Friends of Florida’s Waters –

The hearing on DEP’s efforts to dismiss all four petitioners who are challenging the proposed human health based toxics criteria was held last Wednesday and did not disappoint us in any way. Judge Canter with the Division of Administrative Hearings did his best to get all the legal arguments and factual information out on the table so he can go off in a quiet corner of his office (I’m guessing here) and try to sort it all out and make some sense of it.

After three hours of mostly intelligent discussion, the judge ruled that the case is on hold (abated) until he issues a written order on DEP’s motions to dismiss. The arguments were limited...

Monday, August 29, 2016

Water Pollution In Florida: You May Come Home to This ... by gimleteye


Water pollution is a political event. We know this in Florida through the stage-managed destruction of laws intended to protect the public health from pollution.

Consider the effort to regulate excess fertilizer and nutrients in a state where sugar and cattle industries dominate the political landscape. Hollow laws — like those regulating nutrients and other chemicals invading Florida’s waters — are like shells where incumbents hide in plain sight.

In Florida, when politics are added to pollution, a chain reaction occurs. This reaction of politics to Florida pollution — whether in the Everglades, Lake Okeechobee, or the rivers and estuaries used as toxic dumping zones -- shifts costs straight to the backs of taxpayers, residents and visitors.

Here are two stories of people who became very ill after Florida waters touched them. These tales of suffering pass like dark clouds over the underlying trauma to Florida and the health, welfare and safety of citizens.

Visitors come to Florida for the water and the warm climate like Paula, a 59 year old mother from Sioux County, Iowa, and Mike, the 23 year old commercial fisherman from Martin Couny whose anonymity and privacy I promised in order to tell their stories.

That Florida waters are unsafe should rattle citizens, businesses and government to action. In 2008, the federal US Environmental Protection Agency — a favorite scapegoat of the conservative right — was sued by environmental groups, led by Earthjustice, to enact tough nutrient pollution standards for a state that won't.

The need was clear, as it had been for decades. In 2000, the state and federal government agreed to restore the Everglades, based on a hard and fast numeric standard for one component of water pollution: excess phosphorous. It wasn't just the Everglades. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection first sounded the alarm about the dangers of toxic algae outbreaks in a 2000 scientific report.

Nearly as soon as the ink was dry on the Everglades pact, Big Sugar launched an effort to undermine the standards. In 2003 Big Sugar flooded the state legislature with lobbyists and with the support of then Governor Jeb Bush passed a new law lowering the pollution compliance standard and pushing compliance to the indefinite future. Native Americans — the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians — and a grass-roots group, Friends of the Everglades, sued.

By 2008, it had become clear to clean water advocates that the State of Florida was using bluster and the shield of “states’ rights” to inhibit tough, numerical standards on toxics; protecting special interest insiders like Big Sugar, cattle farmers, and municipalities that externalized costs of growth to keep water rates low to benefit big developers and real estate-related industries.

Paula is from Rock Valley, Iowa, a town of 3700 people. Her husband is a farm equipment dealer. They both were born and raised within 17 miles of where they live today, surrounded by fields of corn, beans, some alfafa and oats. Hog and dairy farms dot the landscape. For the past decade, they have been repeat visitors to a resort near Fort Myers on Florida’s west coast.

Paula and her husband, married for forty years, are part of the annual winter migration that supports Florida’s tourism based economy. Today, nine months after her visit to the Fort Myers area, Paula is tethered to a portable IV line delivering super strength antibiotics to a stubborn infection. This is the first time her story has been told.

Many people come to Florida in the winter to relieve their aches and pains. In July 2015, she had been diagnosed with diabetes. Her arm and shoulder had been aching, too. After visiting Florida, Paula got even sicker.

For nearly a decade the couple visited the same resort. She had heard about the pollution pouring out of the Caloosahatchee River from Lake Okeechobee. The water on the beach when they arrived in March was so dirty that she and her husband agreed they would only swim in the hotel pool.

A recent report on nutrient pollution flowing into Lake Okeechobee disclosed that for the past twenty years, there has been no reduction in nutrients — from fertilizer and animal waste and stormwater runoff — despite state policies specifically targetting nutrient reduction. Excess nutrients in the water column provide a fertile growing zone for dangerous bacteria.

“The shorelines had a lot of black muck,” Paula said. “The people at the resort told us it was fine, even though the beach and water did not look normal to us. Still I like shell hunting. That’s my favorite thing to do. Every day we walked the beach. Lots of time we would be in a foot of water. I cut my foot on a shell.”

When Paula cut her foot, she and her husband knew what to do. They went straight back to the hotel, washed her foot, and put a band-aid on it.

In 2009, the EPA made a determination that numeric nutrient criteria are necessary in Florida. Special interest insiders threw a fit. They called it “federal overreach” and derided the Obama administration. The firestorm helped elect Gov. Rick Scott and US Senator Marco Rubio in the 2010 election cycle. Both rode the wave of Tea Party anti-government sentiment that boosted the fortunes of legislators like state representative Matt Caldwell, a Big Sugar apologist whose district is bisected by a river polluted by his funders.

Two weeks after returning to Iowa, Paula’s arm turned fiercely painful. “By Sunday night I was feeling awful and by next morning I could hardly move.” Her husband rushed her to the doctor. "I was in excruciating pain. It had migrated to my clavical bone.”

Paula thought she had slept on her shoulder wrong and impinged a nerve. Her physician couldn’t find anything wrong and recommended she see a specialist at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, about a four hour drive away. It took six weeks for Paula to get the appointment.

At the Mayo Clinic, a specialist showed her the results of a MRI and told Paula, “You need surgery right away to clean out the diseased bone." A week later, the biopsy results came in: she had contracted internally a common skin bacterial infection that can turn deadly. Her orthopedist would not venture how she had contracted her infection.

On April 22, 2011 the Florida Department of Environmental Protection filed a petition asking the EPA to withdraw its January 2009 determination that numeric nutrient criteria are necessary in Florida. "In a cover letter to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson, Department of Environmental Protection head Herschel Vinyard wrote that the state of Florida remains “committed to addressing excess nutrients pollution” and requests that the EPA restore the responsibility of nutrient management back to the state.” (Sept. 12, 2011, Florida Independent)

The period of Michael's infection was much shorter. In July 2016, the healthy, young commercial fisherman nearly lost his leg to a stubborn and dangerous MRSA infection contracted through a cut in his knee.

Michael fell in love with fishing when he was three years old. His grandfather would take him fishing to a lake in the Orlando area where his family lived. Later, his parents would take the family on long weekends to the beach in Martin County, on Florida’s east coast just above Palm Beach. He never wanted those trips to end. That’s how much the water drew him in. When Michael was twelve, his family moved from Orlando to Martin County, making his dream come true. He fell in love with the St. Lucie River and Indian River Lagoon. There is nowhere else he would rather be and nothing else he would rather do than fish.

“The first time I went I was fishing in the Indian River by the old Jenssen Beach Causeway. The water was beautiful and there was more than enough fish. On any tide you could see six to eight feet visibility, and the closer you got to the inlet, the visibility improved. All I want to do is to be on the water and fish.” Michael's voice quavered. “2013 was the first year I remember the St. Lucie River went bad because of the discharges. Everything died. Every species. Thousands of snook. Live oyster beds that helped filter the water, destroyed. The water quality and sea life never returned after the Lake Okeechobee releases in 2013, but what we are seeing now is even worse. How many years will it take to come back? I don’t know.”

In July, Michael was fishing with a friend. He had a scratch on his knee. The water on the beach was clear when they arrived, but turned green with pollution out of the St. Lucie River after an hour or so. “I told the guy I was with, ‘we got to get out of here’”.

"Four to five days later I noticed some pain in my right knee and then it started swelling up real bad.” At a local hospital he was initially diagnosed with a staph infection, but the knee turned ugly red so fast that his doctors worried he had a flesh eating bacterial infection, called Vibrio Vulnificus. He was finally diagnosed with MRSA, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. "I was hospitalized for six days. It was terrifying. They were talking about me losing my leg if I couldn’t stop the infection.” Doctors put Michael on four different antibiotics intravenously for 24 hours a day. Six weeks later, he is still taking two.

Neither Paula nor Michael are “environmentalists”. The State of Florida, incumbent legislators, Gov. Rick Scott, Senator Marco Rubio, and industry lobbyists have no answer for them. Victims like return tourists and commercial fishermen are not the “wealthy environmentalists” used for political target practice by special interests who dominate legislatures and regulatory agencies like the South Florida Water Management District.

In fact, Big Sugar and other polluters have been as successful in marginalizing environmental agendas as Big Tobacco and Big Oil. It is only when incontrovertible evidence and catastrophe strikes that the environment rises to the top of voters’ concerns.

For polluters, matters related to government regulation are right at the top of their priority list. It is hard to argue, however, that “states versus federal rights” matter when an intravenous PICC attached to your arm is keeping you alive because government couldn’t effectively regulate the toxics that poisoned you.

Today, months after her Florida vacation, Paula is being treated with intravenously-delivered Ceftriaxone, sold under the trade name Rocephin. It is an antibiotic useful for the treatment of a number of bacterial infections including; pneumonia, ear infections, skin infections, urinary tract infections, gonorrhea, pelvic inflammatory disease, sepsis, bone and joint infections, intra-abdominal infections, and meningitis. It is also used preoperatively to reduce the risk of postoperative infections.

Michael had never heard of anyone else getting MRSA. He had never even heard of the infection, but he is certain where it came from and when.
The EPA has estimated that nearly 2,000 miles of the state’s waterways are affected by an excess of nutrients, which is unsurprising considering the lack of standards governing nutrient pollution. Current regulations are based on a “narrative” standard, which simply states that “in no case shall nutrient concentrations of body of water be altered so as to cause an imbalance in natural populations of flora or fauna.”

Now, a new proposed set of standards to limit the waste entering Florida waterways — dubbed numeric nutrient criteria — have become the source for one of Florida’s fiercest political battles.

Nearly every major political figure and industry group in the state has publicly criticized them. Most of the criteria’s detractors argue that they would be too costly for a state still struggling with the effects of recession.

But what is the cost of not implementing them? (Florida Independent, "The Cost of Doing Nothing: How Nutrient Pollution Harms Small Business, May 13, 2013)

I asked Michael if he had health insurance. There was a pause. Then, “No.” He guesses his medical expenses will cost more than $40,000. Then I asked, what the government could have done to protect the water he loves.

“The state isn’t doing anything,” Michael answered vehemently. “They are completely ignoring the facts right in front of their faces. They are ignoring people’s health. Our governor just refuses to mention water quality because he knows he is the source of the problem.” I asked about Big Sugar, the industry that is among Gov. Rick Scott’s and Senator Rubio’s largest campaign contributors.

“The sugar industry,” he says without hesitation, “Needs to go to hell quite frankly.” I asked if he had any advice for fishermen, boaters or visitors to Florida’s beaches. “If the water smells weird or looks weird or if anything seems a little off, avoid all contact with the water. In all honesty, until they change what they are doing now, I wouldn’t even go in the water.” That’s from someone who loves Florida’s waters more than anything in the world.

Paula loves shelling in on the beaches near Fort Myers, but she has no plans to return to Florida anytime soon. “My shoulder and clavical looked in the MRI liked moths came in and chewed it away”.

Tragically, Florida’s environmental protections are also look like they were eaten by moths.

For decades Florida’s polluters have claimed they are doing their fair share to clean up pollution. In 2009, the Florida Chamber of Commerce, Associated industries of Florida and the GOP leadership fought against clean water rules by the federal government, pounding the table that it was about time states’ rights took over from the heavy hand of federal government. They parroted the same line in the Florida legislature in 2015, just last year, when the Republican legislature — at the urging of Agriculture Secretary Adam Putnam and support of Gov. Rick Scott — passed a new water quality law that further weakens already weak standards.

Michael and Paula’s illnesses raise other questions. The state should require a detailed and public database of severe infections from contact with Florida water. That such data is bad for business is underscored by the way the state of Florida Department of Health continues to sit on evidence that rare pediatric cancer clusters exist in Florida, including one in Miami-Dade and one in the area of Lake Okeechobee.

Until voters take command and insist on accountability, it is hard to see any hope for change on the horizon. Tourists and residents will continue to get sick. The costs will continue to shift from polluters to taxpayers. And Gov. Rick Scott and the Florida Chamber of Commerce will continue to insist everything needs to be kept in perspective.

Their “perspective” is not just a matter of politics: in Florida it can make you, your family and friends very, very ill. If voters can summon the will of activists for clean water, then in November politicians like US Senator Marco Rubio — whose political capital has been earned by sheltering Big Sugar — will be gone. For others, the memory of illnesses and what is happening to Florida's waterways will not be so easy to erase.

Friday, August 12, 2016

Rick Scott's Cancer Roulette Stopped By Seminole Lawsuit ... by gimleteye

There have been countless organizations, individuals, local governments, media outlets, schools, businesses and more – working to educate the public about how our state government is trying to increase our risk of getting cancer and other diseases through greater exposure to toxic and/or carcinogenic chemicals that are discharged into our drinking water supplies and waters where we fish, swim and harvest shellfish. Linda Young, Florida Clean Water Network

The most tone-deaf governor in Florida history, Rick Scott, continues to steadfastly pursue a statistics driven game: how far can he go as a politician in Florida without being impeached or sent back to the private sector to become even richer.

For Scott it is a no-lose game. For Floridians, especially those victimized by toxic waters, it is a no-win game.

No-win, because Florida state laws do not protect public health, quality of life or the environment from polluters who crowd the governor's office.

I know how Rick Scott gets up in the morning: he imagines he is doing a good job because he understands risk-reward calculations for millions of Floridians as basically an exercise in statistical probabilities. Moral fiber? Not so much.

Scott is also a micro-manager where it serves the important goal of proving to himself each morning, that he understands more about risk-reward calculations based on probably outcomes better than "regulators". (In this, he is more like Donald Trump, the presidential candidate he represents as fundraiser-in-chief than anyone else in politics.)

That's how Florida has turned into a toxic soup, with all Florida coastlines buckling under waves of water polluted with blue-green algae and dead sea grass: Gov. Rick Scott game of roulette with Florida.

It is also a cancer roulette. Scott recently proposed a new law governing water pollution that weakens the protections afforded Floridians. This week, the Seminole Tribe of Indians sued the state, and for that we should be very, very thankful.

Here is Florida Clean Water Network's take:

NEW DEVELOPMENT IN TOXICS RULE

Dear Friends of Florida’s Waters –

This afternoon we received great news from the Seminole Nation in South Florida. They have petitioned for an administrative hearing at the Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH) to challenge DEP’s Human Health Toxics Criteria Rule. Hurray for the Seminole Tribe!!!!

This is critically important for two reasons:

The Tribes may be the only group in the state that could have standing to challenge;
The petition correctly points out that the public notice for the hearing was inadequate and therefore the rule is invalid.
This likely means that DEP has to do the hearing all over again. Yes!!! You read that correctly. All over again.

If I had to guess, I will guess that the DEP will voluntarily pull the rule from DOAH and schedule a new hearing. We have to wait and see about that.

In the meantime, we will NOT let any grass grow under our feet. Right? I am writing a petition to Rick Scott that will get widely circulated by all of us, on social media and through the network of organizations that are working on this. Here’s what we will demand from Rick Scott:

That he fill three seats on the Environmental Regulation Commission (ERC) before any more ERC meetings/hearings are held. These seats include the two empty ones for an environmental representative and a local government representative.

He also needs to excuse Craig Varn, who was appointed to fill the “Lay Person” seat, one month after he resigned from DEP as general counsel. He is not a “Lay Person,” he is a plant, a ringer.

Here is the dictionary definition of Craig Varn on the ERC:

That he instructs DEP to hold public workshops around the state so that everyone can know and understand what this major change in public policy toward human health protection is all about. There should be at least two in SE Florida (Broward and Dade), at least one in SW Florida, one in the Tampa Bay area, one in NE Florida and one in NW Florida. The workshops and final hearing should be held in facilities that are large enough for everyone to be in the same room so everyone can hear the proceedings.

That he instructs DEP to properly advertise the workshops and the hearing and not rely exclusively on a notice in the Florida Administrative Weekly, which no one except attorneys read. The workshops and hearing/s should be advertised in every major newspaper in the state and sent out to television stations as well.

In my next newsletter, which will arrive quickly, I will provide the link to a petition that you can sign and share with everyone. Our previous suggestion to contact EPA is still okay but this rule will not reach EPA for many months now. So our focus will be on getting the public educated on what’s happening and getting people to speak out against increasing toxic chemicals in our waters and the fish we eat; against putting public health at greater risk of cancer and other serious diseases; and against DEP and Rick Scott trying to ride roughshod over us with their Florida Cancer Lottery, as if we don’t matter when there is an opportunity for corporations to make more money.

Finally, thank you to everyone for your great work on this issue. There have been countless organizations, individuals, local governments, media outlets, schools, businesses and more – working to educate the public about how our state government is trying to increase our risk of getting cancer and other diseases through greater exposure to toxic and/or carcinogenic chemicals that are discharged into our drinking water supplies and waters where we fish, swim and harvest shellfish.

Together we can defeat Rick Scott’s Cancer Lottery!!!

For all of Florida’s Waters,

Linda Young

Wednesday, June 29, 2016

What You Should Know About RANDY PERKINS Running for Congress. By Geniusofdespair


Randy Perkins is running as a Democrat for Congress in the 18th District. Is he a DINO -- a Democrat in Name Only?

Turns out that Randy Perkins seems to be a Republican who might be working with Ken Pruitt's machine pretending to be a Democrat to get elected to congress in a District hard hit by the Algae Pollution, and thus, turned off to the Republicans that support the bad water policies. A guy who got rich off of cleaning up pollution tragedies. My friend said Perkins gave $200,000 to Elect Republican Rick Scott. Cannot find the info on line. But I did find this in the Palm Beach Post:
Perkins’ disaster recovery business, AshBritt Inc., gave $100,000 to Scott’s Let’s Get To Work committee in August 2010 while Scott was battling Bill McCollum for the Republican gubernatorial nomination. The contributor was misspelled as “Ashbitt” in a Division of Elections filing.

AshBritt also helped Scott by giving $100,000 in October 2010 to the Republican Governors Association Florida PAC. 
The company has hired  over 36 different lobbyists over the past 10 years.

My friend in Martin County said Randy has a ton of momentum in District 18: He added: "I woke up in the middle of the night thinking we will have 10 more lost summers of toxic algae if he gets in."  "The big sugar politicians are pretending to be democrats this year.   Maybe you can expose his donations to Rick Scott's campaign.  People need to know!"

Perkins is one of the initial members of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee's Red to Blue Program. The program "highlights top Democratic campaigns across the country, and offers them financial, communications, grassroots, and strategic support.

AshBritt has made 57 contributions totaling $596,750 according to Follow the Money, a very hard website to navigate. I found this there.


This candidate - Randy Perkins - needs some opposition research quickly! When they self fund, you really can't tell where they stand.

Friday, May 27, 2016

Florida Taxpayers And Toxic Waters: The Outrage Is Building ... by gimleteye

Captain Mike Holliday, February 2016
Today there are places in Florida where water is too toxic to touch. Blue green algae is coursing out of Lake Okeechobee and is as comfortable in diseased rivers and estuaries as legislators in Tallahassee.

Every taxpayer in the state is funding this debacle, whether they know it or not. Water quality, property rights and public health are allowed to deteriorate for a simple reason: corporations that control the levers of government are more intent on protecting profits than people. When you hear Gov. Rick Scott's incessant mantra about "jobs", keep that in the back of your minds.

Mike Holliday is a 38-year resident of Stuart, an outdoor writer and fishing guide. He's just written an excellent OPED in the Treasure Coast Palm, "How to end the cycle of destruction in our estuaries" (reprinted below).

SWLF clean water activist John Heim
A few comments, first: the cycle of destruction in Florida is fueled by corporate welfare accruing to the benefit of Big Sugar and its beneficiaries; a political elite willing to spend millions of your tax dollars against your own interests.

Yes, Florida needs jobs but we don't need jobs in a state coated by a ring of pollution so severe it makes Floridians the functional equivalent of coal miners in Kentucky: shit out of luck.

The Florida legislature and executive branch, lead by a radicalized GOP, have swung so far to the right that even this year's outpouring of anger from mostly Republican districts fronting the Caloosahatchee, the St. Lucie and Indian River lagoon -- is scarcely heard in Tallahassee. And poor Florida Bay.

Oh there are the rare senate field hearing, the government PR events, the announcements from Gov. Scott's office, from the senate president Joe Negron's office, from agriculture secretary Adam Putnam and representative Matt Caldwell. All coordinated. All spin. All the time.

Heim is now hospitalized for toxics exposure
http://www.fox4now.com/news/clean-water-activist-hospitalized
The way to redress these imbalances, these taxpayer ripoffs and misdirections, is at the ballot box during August primaries and in the November general election. It is critical to show politicians that Marco Rubio's frightful defeat in the GOP presidential primary was not a fluke or aberration. Rubio is still defending his corporate polluter benefactors, and even considering running for re-election.

Fair Districts -- fought by the liberal application of tens of millions of taxpayer money by the GOP in Florida -- gives hope that eventually Floridians' waterfront property, public health and environment will be priorities of the rebalanced legislature.

In the meantime, newspapers and television news have been largely captured by polluters' advertising budgets and promotion of false equivalencies. For months, US Sugar Corporation has been deluging Martin and Palm Beach counties with daily ads professing what good corporate citizens they are, how we have to "stay the course" with existing projects, how they are just good neighbors like you.

Behind the scenes, US Sugar (owned by the charitable Charles Stuart Mott Foundation) and its Big Sugar twin -- Flo-Sun and Florida Crystals (owned by the Billionaire Fanjuls of Coral Gables and Palm Beach) -- furiously work to delineate terms of Florida's water policy through mouthpieces like Ag Secretary Adam Putnam. It is pay-to-play, legislators lubricated with campaign contributions and marketing expenses extracted from the corporate welfare benefiting billionaire farmers; a continuous record of chipping away legal provisions for the state's water quality and policies.

One of Big Sugar's tactics from a dog-eared 1990's playbook: find an enemy to target. Hire fake actors to mount fake protests. Use a proxy, the South Florida Water Management District through a governing board micromanaged by Gov. Rick Scott, to carpet bomb misdirection, deploy fronts like economic "councils" on both coasts, or political operatives to hit the Everglades Foundation and its founder, Paul Tudor Jones, a Wall Street billionaire.

Big Sugar would love to make the battle of billionaires versus a billionaire. It's not working because people understand how the battle pits taxpayers down in the dumps and anxious about the future against polluters who will squeeze every last cent of profit from the Everglades Agricultural Area.

It is taking a lot of social media to fight back extraordinarily well-organized, well-funded, smart insiders, but it is happening day-by-day, every day.

There is always a chance that Big Sugar will decide now is the time to sell. That the conditions for selling at least 100,000 acres of land south of Lake Okeechobee to store and clean water adequate to the purpose of protecting rivers, estuaries, the Everglade and Florida Bay will never be better than they are, now.

Local county governments should follow Miami-Dade County's example and pass resolutions calling explicitly for the purchase of Big Sugar lands in the Everglades Agricultural Area. The money is there. The science is there. The need is there. The only missing piece: political leadership.



Mike Holliday: How to end the cycle of destruction in our estuaries
Treasure Coast Palm. May 27, 2016
By Mike Holliday

Florida's estuaries are under siege. At no time in our history has there been such a distinct collapse of our waterways as what we're seeing on both coasts and in Florida Bay. And it's going to get a lot worse before it gets better.

To understand the solutions, you have to understand the problems. The Everglades and Florida Bay are starving for the freshwater that used to flow south from Lake Okeechobee, through what is now the Everglades Agricultural Area. Less than one-third of the freshwater that historically flowed into the Everglades now goes there.

Thursday, May 26, 2016

Want Alzheimer's? Read this ... by gimleteye

Ignoring science that conflicts with profit is putting taxpayers at severe risk, not just to property values but also to health. Along this line, the explosion of toxic blue green algae in Lake Okeechobee and Florida's rivers and estuaries is a warning.

When people are polled about the environment, the percentage who believe that the environment is a serious concern are low -- often in the single digits. The pollsters aren't asking the right questions or in the right sequence.

Try asking: "Do you want Alzheimers?" 100 percent of respondents would say, no.

Then: "If you knew toxic fresh water could cause Alzheimers, would you support regulations to protect against that outcome?" Again, 100 percent would say, yes.

Then, ask this: "Do you support protection of the environment or industries that poison the environment?"

These are not academic questions in Florida, they are just questions that don't get asked because polls are expensive and who is going to pay to ask hard hitting questions.

Today there is an outbreak of toxic blue green algae in the Caloosahatchee River. Here is one story from the local Fox affiliate: "Algae blooms close Franklin Park on the Caloosahatchee River".

The Caloosahatchee, one of Florida's most diseased arteries and now filled with blue green toxic algae, runs straight through the district of Big Sugar's latest mouthpiece in the state legislature: Lee County Representative Matt Caldwell. Hundreds of scientists have pleaded with legislators like Caldwell: take more land out of sugarcane production south of Lake Okeechobee to store stormwater adequate to the volume and purpose of stopping the harmful discharges to Florida's rivers, bays, and coasts. Feeling the weight of Big Sugar money in his pockets, Caldwell said, no.

Top elected officials like Gov. Rick Scott, Agriculture Secretary Adam Putnam and Caldwell promote legislation, pass laws that weaken public health while denying funding and disclosure of data that could illuminate these issues for taxpayers.

Exactly one year ago Eye On Miami wrote about the failure of the State of Florida to adequately disclose data to match with independent statistical evaluations in peer-reviewed journals that rare pediatric cancer clusters do exist in Florida. Right here, in Miami-Dade. Nothing has happened, since. Zero. Zilch ("Cancer Clusters In Florida: The Silence Of The State").

Voters ought to stop and ask: do you want Alzheimer's? Do you support tax dollars to regulate pollution that may cause Alzheimer's? Would you vote for a candidate who values environmental protection or a candidate who favor polluters by blocking science related to Alzheimer's and pediatric cancer?

If enough voters were asked these questions in this way, there would be a revolution in American politics.

New York Times
May 26, 2016
Could Alzheimer's Stem From Infections? It Makes Sense, Experts Say

Could it be that Alzheimer’s disease stems from the toxic remnants of the brain’s attempt to fight off infection?

Provocative new research by a team of investigators at Harvard leads to this startling hypothesis, which could explain the origins of plaque, the mysterious hard little balls that pockmark the brains of people with Alzheimer’s.

Scientists: Toxin in blue-green algae could trigger neurological diseases
By Tyler Treadway of TCPalm

Just as the potential for blue-green algae blooms in local waters ramps up, scientists are warning there's a newly discovered and potentially deadly toxin in the slimy stuff.

Blue-green algae produces a toxin called BMAA that is suspected of triggering neurological diseases such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, also known as ALS or Lou Gehrig's Disease.

The link between BMAA (Beta-N-Methylamino-L-alanine) in blue-green algae blooms and neurological diseases is "still a hypothesis," said Larry Brand, marine and atmospheric science professor at the University of Miami, "but the evidence is growing."

Wednesday, May 11, 2016

Florida counties should specifically track and publish the toll from water-borne illnesses ... by gimleteye


There are so many questions about water quality that are unanswered by Florida elected officials who take the oath to protect the health and public welfare of taxpayers and voters.

Florida health officials in counties affected by water quality emergencies should require a database on water-borne illnesses and outcomes; especially methyl resistant staph infections otherwise known as flesh eating bacteria. Today, taxpayers and voters are in the dark. Agency staffers who could make a difference are either indifferent or too scared of their political bosses. The rote answer by politicians: "We don't want to alarm the public."

Another stock answer: "We don't want to raise people's taxes to report news that draws attention to how poorly water quality is managed in Florida."

Marty Baum, the Indian River Waterkeeper, took me on a tour last week of the St. Lucie River. There are no birds. No fishermen, no fish. Definitely no swimmers with signs like the one above posted at a local boat ramp. "Don't touch the water."

Lots of high priced, river-front real estate looking suspended in animation. At a harbor restaurant where lunch was served, a nearby water sports concession was shuttered.

Your tax dollars are being used to keep you in the dark about Florida's water quality emergency. It is time to put some sunlight on this issue. It should not be left to guessing or chance which doctors and which hospitals and clinics are handling life-threatening emergencies because a child or adult has inadvertently paid the price for contact with Florida's toxic waters.

Monday, April 18, 2016

It's a bad time not to believe in scientists ... by gimleteye

Research points to pond scum connection for ALS, Alzheimer’s diseases - John Pacenti, Palm Beach Post
Down here in Miami, we have missed the action taking place up north in Palm Beach and Martin Counties and over on the west coast, in Lee County where Big Sugar is pushing back hard after being thrown on the defensive by a new, coordinated attack by fishermen, homeowners, and citizens furious with the pollution of Florida waterways like the Indian River Lagoon and Caloosahatchee River. Big Sugar is taking out full page ads, defending the indefensible, calling on local business councils and trying its best to drive wedges in the opposition, because millions of Floridians are finally catching on to the fact that it is just a few billionaire families who are benefiting from the pollution of state waters.

No less an authority than the South Florida Water Management District -- funded by taxpayers -- has leapt to Big Sugar's defense as well, claiming every reason under the sun why pollution is rampant on Florida's coasts, except for the influence of Big Sugar. The District PR machine is huffing and puffing in indignation, venting everywhere except at Big Sugar's refusal to sell lands in the Everglades Agricultural Area adequate to the purpose of cleansing and storage marshes.

Never mind that Big Sugar's legacy pollution of Lake Okeechobee doesn't appear in any of the bright, shiny PR pieces drummed out of its dog-eared playbook. Never mind that more than 75 percent of Florida voters approved Amendment 1 in 2014 to do exactly what is needed: buy-out Big Sugar's strategically placed lands. Never mind that the University of Florida published a recent study and more than 200 scientists signed a letter to Gov. Rick Scott urging the acquisition of lands in the EAA. Never mind that those ads don't mention anywhere the political arm-twisting that goes on, at county commissions around the state so that Big Sugar gets what it wants, when it wants it.

Everything is convenient in Florida for Big Sugar. Everything is inconvenient for taxpayers and residents. The PR machine says it all: good for Florida, good for families. Nothing about Big Sugar causing trillion dollar holes in the nation's health care system, or costing tens of thousands of jobs in U.S. food industries, or the collateral damage to waterways that include rare bacterial infections and worse.

"It is a bad time not to believe in scientists," former Martin County commissioner Maggie Hurchalla said the other day. The latest news: that severely polluted waters along South Florida rivers and bays contain the kind of scum that could connect devastating human tragedies from disease to Florida's diseased water management practices.

But don't expect help from your state legislature or Gov. Scott or his presumptive heir, Agriculture Secretary Adam Putnam. According to a source, Putnam was overheard last week telling a colleague that anyone caught talking about buying Big Sugar lands south of Lake Okeechobee would be "vaporized". Yes, that is the word he used exactly.

You see, what Big Sugar fears most of all is an educated public. If I were a betting man, I would tell Big Sugar that the world is never going to be more perfect for you than it is right now. You would do best selling all that land, because the world is not shaping up to be a better place for you than right now, right here. That would be my bet.

It's a bad time not to believe in scientists.

Research points to pond scum connection for ALS, Alzheimer’s diseases
HEALTH By John Pacenti - Palm Beach Post Staff Writer, March 25, 2016

Some of the most devastating diseases on Earth — ALS, Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s — may be connected to one of the world’s most ancient life forms: a ubiquitous photo-synthesizing bacteria that already wreaks havoc on the environment.

Most know it as pond scum.

Blue-green algal blooms damage pristine estuaries and the state’s natural freshwater treasures, such as Florida Bay, Indian River Lagoon, the Caloosahatchee River and Lake Okeechobee — the latter a backup water source for West Palm Beach. Known as cyanobacteria, this brand of pond scum can percolate in stagnant residential lakes in Palm Beach County.

In the past decade, a consortium of 50 scientists around the world led by firebrand ethnobotanist Paul Alan Cox found cyanobacteria produce a toxin called BMAA that acts like an arsonist in the human brain, leaving sticky plaque buildup around nerve cells and causing protein tangles within those neurons. It is the same calling card found in patients of these neurological illnesses.

Friday, April 08, 2016

Tomorrow: Commissioner Levine Cava Invites You To a Water Summit! By Geniusofdespair

Note to Commissioner Levine Cava: Getting somewhere at 9am on a Saturday -- You need to offer good food.  I mean really good food.  Did you know Hal Wanless had lox and bagels at his 9am event? Anyway, for the readers that don't need food to lure them to get up and get dressed, the Water Summit should be a good event to go to tomorrow.  Levine Cava says:
"Why Water Matters" - will be a discussion about the connection between water and life in South Florida. Join me to hear from experts and community leaders on Everglades Restoration and the impact of Climate Change on our water resources. Come prepared for an interactive conversation on a topic that affects us all but we often take for granted.  
You should never throw the baby out with the bathwater but throw a Tomato at Eric for the letter he signed on to below. Hold him accountable. It is imporant to go but it also is important to have Eric do some serious splainin'.  I might go just to see that. The Everglades Foundation does some very good things but the letter wasn't one of them.


Everglades Foundation Eric Eikenberg letter praising FPL, be sure to ask him why he signed on to this letter obviously written by the Audubon suck up extraordinaire Eric Draper:

Monday, March 28, 2016

We Know What We Are Seeing: Buy Big Sugar Lands, Send Clean, Fresh Water South ... by gimleteye

People in South Florida are beginning to understand how every taxpayer in South Florida is hostage to the dismal water quality in Lake Okeechobee. This is us.

Imagine that we are citizens of Flint, Michigan -- forced by government and elected officials to drink water contaminated with lead. In Florida, the metaphor is apt.

First of all, count on government officials and the agency PR machine to deny. They are doing it now: issuing press statements assuring that all is well, problem is recognized and addressed. Second, they will go to newspapers and TV stations where they have cultivated relationships. Third, they will attack critics as ill-informed, penning letters to the editors and OPED's for others to submit.

This formulaic response did protect the special interest's prerogatives and corporate welfare over decades. Something changed. What changed is that voters and taxpayers know what we are seeing, and we are expressing it very clearly in photos, videos, and blog posts on social media -- viewed by hundreds of thousands of Floridians.

Here, we live and recreate on or simply appreciate waterways like the Indian River Lagoon, Sanibel and Captiva Islands, the Caloosahatchee River directly impacted by the Lake Okeechobee's filthy water. Or Biscayne Bay and the Everglades. We know what we are seeing.

The problem with Florida's dismal water quality is not just that we taxpayers are sacrifice zones for Big Sugar. It is that we are all hostage to the bad water quality coming out of Lake Okeechobee.


There is an answer and another plan. Last August, 207 scientists petitioned Gov. Rick Scott to buy Bug Sugar lands, to put enough storage in place that the catastrophe that occurred this recent January might not have happened. This bears repeating: if Gov. Scott and the Florida legislature had completed the deal to buy U.S. Sugar lands, that U.S. shareholders approved in 2008, they would be able to say -- at least -- that they were doing something to alleviate Lake O stormwater runoff even if it still will take years to complete. They did the opposite.

They refused to allocate Amendment 1 funding, approved by more than 75 percent of Florida voters as a constitutional amendment in 2014, to buy Big Sugar lands south of Lake Okeechobee. This legislative session, they approved a new state water policy that protects polluters inside virtual barbed wire enclosures. "We will call it pollution when we decide to call it pollution."

Decades lost to restoring water quality in Florida -- despite billions spent -- serve a single purpose: to make Big Sugar even richer. In the U.S. Congress, not even conservatives or tea party stalwarts have been able to remove the stigma of corporate welfare embedded in the Farm Bill, that guarantees Big Sugar profits before a single seed is planted. Big Sugar takes a fraction of those guaranteed profits, fertilizes Tallahassee and local county commissions and political races, and thus ensures that taxpayers will shoulder the majority of the cost and pain of cleaning up the industry's pollution.

Here is what the scientists signed last summer. “As a scientist working in the Everglades," they each asserted, "... it is my scientific opinion that increased storage and treatment of freshwater south of Lake Okeechobee, and additional flow from the lake southward, is essential to restoring the Everglades, Florida Bay, and the Caloosahatchee and St.Lucie estuaries.” (names, listed below)

Gov. Scott and Ag. Secretary Adam Putnam and the rest of the Florida legislature basically told the scientists to fuck off. (Same as US Senator Marco Rubio, who refused to meet with climate change scientists over a period of many years.)

We can't get to fixing the Lake Okeechobee problem until a government agency makes the case for taking the land by eminent domain. Part of the reason eminent domain is necessary is because of fragmented land ownership in the EAA. Another part is common sense: until Big Sugar feels the heat of political change, there is no reason to change.

Taxpayers feel helpless; mislead by Agriculture Secretary Adam Putnam, by Governor Rick Scott, by Sig Sugar's mouthpieces like Senate president Joe Negron and Representative Matt Caldwell. We don't know what to do, because we are being lied to.

A plan forward will not happen until we elect politicians to step forward. It can't happen in Florida so long as the state legislature is in the hammer hold of Big Sugar. It might happen if a federal agency steps up to protect the national interest in the Everglades, with the support of Congress and the White House.

Along this line, Monroe County -- including the Florida Keys -- has already stepped forward asking government agencies to speed up Everglades restoration. Also along this line, Florida voters already rejected two GOP presidential primary candidates -- Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio -- firmly in Big Sugar's pockets.

Taking Big Sugar lands is not a question -- as Big Sugar tries to sell -- of over-reaching government. They know and we know since time for our estuaries and Everglades and Florida Bay has run out, it is only a question of price.


With Gov. Rick Scott and Ag. Secretary Putnam at the helm, even getting to the price is impossible because they are fully committed to embarrassing excuses, half-measures, and outright pandering to the billionaires' sticky embrace. When Republican water managers refused to exercise the option to buy US Sugar lands, they showed their cards. It is time for voters to show, ours.



More land needed to stop discharges, science shows
Jennifer Hecker 5:01 p.m. EDT March 26, 2016
Fort Myers News Press

Additional land purchase in the Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA) for more water storage, treatment and conveyance south has been highlighted as the necessary missing piece of the puzzle to restoring the Everglades and south Florida estuaries for years, as outlined in the state’s 2008 Reviving the River of Grass initiative and the more recent 2015 University of Florida Water Institute study.

Sunday, March 13, 2016

Ray Judah: Why the 2016 Water Bill represents an historic low tide for Florida voters ...

Gimleteye: The following was printed recently in a Fort Myers area newspaper. The legislator most responsible for carrying Big Sugar's agenda in Tallahassee, Representative Matt Caldwell, is a disaster for Florida.


A recent rebuttal by Brewster Bevis to my earlier commentary "Taxpayers continue to pick up the clean-up tab" concerning the 2016 Water bill signed into law by Gov. Scott, is fraught with self serving interest and does not even pass the straight face test.

To begin with, Mr. Bevis is the Chairman of the Florida H2O Coalition. The name of the organization sounds credible, except that the coalition is associated with the politically powerful Associated Industries of Florida. Representing businesses that continue to pollute and overdraw from our declining aquifers, Associated Industries of Florida and their affiliate Florida H2O Coalition have opposed recent law suits claiming the legislature misappropriated over $300 million of Amendment 1 funds to uses not allowable for the Land Acquisition Trust Fund ( i.e. purchase of state vehicles, salaries and benefits for employees of state regulatory agencies and insurance coverage). Over 75% of voters approved Amendment 1 to purchase and manage conservation lands, but the state legislature raided the funds to balance the budget in violation of the public trust.

Contrary to Mr. Brewster assertion that my "time would be better spent reading the new law" (SB 552 and HB 7005), I have thoroughly reviewed this horrendous piece of legislation and offer the following specifics:

The diminishment of Water Management District (WMD) autonomy in water use and planning decisions to appropriately consider Consumptive Use Permit applications and conditions.

WMD's stripped of their authority to modify permitted allocations under consumptive water use permits to avoid water reservation legal challenges and flexibility to meet the end users actual water withdraw levels and reallocate water surplus for critical environmental releases to restore springs, rivers and estuaries.

The failure to establish water conservation as a priority. Given the uncertainty of seasonal fluctuations and increasing use of ground and surface water due to anticipated population growth, water conservation is a more cost effective and sustainable alternative to developing new water supplies.

The replacement of the regulatory permitting process that included performance standards to address potential pollutant loading of freshwater riparian systems and coastal estuaries with the sole reliance on ineffective Basin Management Action Plans (BMAP) which will lead to a reactive, ineffective and costly approach to management of the state's water resources. BMAP's only go into effect after water bodies are severely polluted, with the costs paid by taxpayers, instead of those responsible for the pollution. It was imperative that the Works of the District be retained in the Northern Everglades and Estuaries Protection Program to ensure compliance with target pollution levels and restore the Lake Okeechobee and Caloosahatchee watersheds, but was weakened to accommodate agriculture.

The Water bill delays Lake Okeechobee clean up by eliminating a January 2015 deadline -which the state didn’t meet - for compliance with nutrient levels without creating a new deadline. More than 400 tons of phosphorus enter the lake each year and the state was supposed to reduce it to 105 tons.

No deadlines for setting Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) for nutrients even though nitrogen and phosphorous are the most destructive pollutants throughout the state. Delayed targets for achieving Minimum Flows & Minimum Levels (MFMLs) and TMDLs (20 to 32 years) allow the ongoing degradation of Florida’s waters to continue, making restoration more difficult and costly for future generations.

Finally, numerous local governments have implemented effective fertilizer ordinances to prevent nutrient loading of waterways. The Water bill's reference to less stringent state sanctioned urban fertilizer regulation standards could severely diminish the ability of local government to adequately address sources of pollution-laden stormwater runoff.

The Water bill originated out of the office of Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services and sponsored by Representative Matt Caldwell resulting in providing safe harbor to the agriculture industry, including Big Sugar, from being held accountable in helping to restore our impaired lakes, streams, rivers, coastal estuaries and Everglades.

Ray Judah
Former Lee County Commissioner

Wednesday, February 03, 2016

News around Florida: Mayor Gimenez, U.S. Century Bank, Push Poll... By Geniusofdespair

St. Lucie Lock - Photo Posted By Marjorie Shropshire

The South Florida Water Management District Back-pumped about 15 billions gallons of polluted sugar farm water into Lake Okeechobee that added 1 inch to the lake. Then they opened the flood gates to the East and West to protect the dykes around the lake. These purges pollute the St. Lucie Estuary and Caloosahatchee Rivers -- the water is now a reddish brown according to residents.

U.S. Century Bank, our most favorite bank, lost $5.8 Million last year. It has consistently had a 0 rating from Bauer Financial, a company that rates banks. Marco Rubio was a Board Member of the Latin Builders Association (Most of the Board Members of the U.S. Century Bank at its start, were LBA Members and Board Members) and got a favorable mortgage rate from the bank.

According to a Michael Putney Editorial in the Miami Herald, he thinks it is a plus that Gimenez has had no scandals in his administration and he thinks it should have been part of his State of the County address. First that is never a plus. you shouldn't have any as a matter of course. Second, he has had scandals. Depends on how big you want them to be. Apparently you want them very big for them to register Mr. Putney. And, Michael, really Alice Bravo? Do your research. Putney also takes Raquel Regalado to task for having no managerial experience. That is why you hire Staff. The current Mayor did that and just makes decisions based on staff recommendations.  What do you think Jack Osterholt does over there?  Exactly what Managerial experience does Marco Rubio have or Barack Obama? That is not a necessity. If you are smart, you hire the best staff, you don't just move the same warmed over staff around,  like Lester Sola, Gimenez pal. Even though it is a strong mayor form of Government in the County and they are supposed to also be the County Manager, Gimenez went out and hired a slew of Vice Mayors to actually do the dirty work so I don't know that Putney's assertion rings true. The County employees have never been more unhappy with a Mayor, except the ones making the big bucks. The Department heads are scared. Lester Sola head of Water and Sewer with no engineering background? Mr. Putney, you think that is a good Managerial decision? And, if he was such a good Manager why did Manny Diaz boot him out of the City so fast?

I got chosen for a push poll for Gimenez the other night:
A push poll is an interactive marketing technique, most commonly employed during political campaigning, in which an individual or organization attempts to influence or alter the view of voters under the guise of conducting a poll.
Gimenez took credit for county term limits -- Really? -- and blamed Regalado for the School Bond issue that the voters voted for. No fair. If you don't follow County Government like I do, by the end of the poll you would think Raquel Regalado was a piss poor excuse for a woman, not an intelligent, articulate woman who is a radio commentator and a School Board Member, raising two children, one autistic. Oh, Union people, there was a question about you on the poll. Not in a good way. Oh, Michael Putney, they cited Raquel Regalado for no managerial experience.

Tuesday, February 02, 2016

Investigative Report: WHO GETS THE MYSTERY WATER? HIALEAH OR MIAMI LAKES? By Geniusofdespair

EYE ON MIAMI INVESTIGATIVE REPORT:

City of Hialeah Water Treatment Plant
Long ago, in a galaxy not so far away, it was required that Hialeah build a water plant as a caveat to move the UDB line - the water was to supply the NEW development on the other side of the UDB. Hialeah agreed to build the plant so the UDB line was moved for Hialeah. They forked over $100 million for the reverse osmosis plant, but somehow the County also forked over the same. Why? It was a condition for the movement of the line. Why did the County pay anything?

Anyway the plant was built by some firm from Spain. Yes, we always use locals don't we? The plant had fatal flaws and wasn't able to run. The raw water for the plant was to come from 14 deep wells. The plant was designed to only supply 10 Million Gallons Daily (for the new development). To give you some idea of how little that is, FPL recently got permission to pump an additional 100 Million Gallons of fresh water daily to keep the toasty-hot cooling canals cooler. With the failed Plant in tow, the Spanish company was bought by another company in South Korea and the South Koreans were tasked with "fixing" the reverse osmosis plant. Did they? The plant has never worked right and the people working there are not water and sewer personnel. In the Flint Michigan spirit of water delivery, the Hialeah plant started delivering water anyway. Could be rotten water for all we know.

The staff at the plant "blended" the mystery Hialeah water with the usual water supplying Miami Lakes. Choke. Why Miami Lakes? Hialeah didn't want to poison its own? Anyway there is more to this story. Much more.

Why aren't County Workers and DERM overseeing this water delivery since the County has $100 million invested in this fiasco? I want to know, and so does Mayor Michael Pizzi who has called Lester Sola at WASA for answers.

By the way, why is the County buying up land way out west in North Dade? I heard they want to put a Wastewater treatment plant out there. Really? Out west near our North West well field? Is that why they are testing that deep deep inject well at Virginia Key. I see a conspiracy of bad planning going on and tainting of water in our future. Injection wells have never been a proven method to dispose of anything.

Sunday, January 03, 2016

ASR Disaster: why is this not being reported by The Miami Herald? ... by gimleteye

Aquifer Storage and Recovery wells are a discredited technology that nonetheless is being pursued with zeal by the most clueless governor in Florida history: Rick Scott.

Moneys from Amendment 1 -- the constitutional amendment passed by over 78 percent of Florida voters in 2014 -- are now being targeted as critics anticipated for development of wells that will serve primarily to enrich campaign contributors and the supply chain related to water infrastructure in Florida.

I've been a critic of ASR since it first surfaced as the key component of Everglades "restoration" in the late 1990's. John Rehill, for Bradenton Times, does an excellent job recapping the malodorous facts behind the rejuvenation of a very, very bad idea.

The Bradenton Times
ASR Wells are Full of Empty Promises
John Rehill•Sunday, Dec 27, 2015


Billions of environmental dollars are on their way to be flushed down into the ground with the dry-cleaning fluid, surface-water, wastewater and reverse-osmosis brine. Officials will tell us that there, deep beneath our feet, the people have an investment which will grow in the form of a water reservoir, hedging the cost for future water shortages. But it's more about funneling funds than culling water; more about bracing for skyrocketing water fees than a cost-saving solution.

The plan reads like a novel set in a parallel universe, half fiction, half figment, unprincipled and corrupt; it's a Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) scheme that's based on a hoax.

Tuesday, October 20, 2015

Tonite if you are not busy ... check out the panel discussion on sea level rise in Miami ... by gimleteye

This panel discussion is notable for the inclusion of a panelist who is normally confined to the grounds of the South Florida Water Management District or to science symposiums: Jayantha Obeysekera, Director Hydrologic & Environmental Systems Modeling Department.

If you take the politics out of water management in South Florida -- which is about 99.5 percent of it -- what is left is scientists like Obeysekera who are deeply involved in the realities (and not the profit aims of Florida's shadow government) of sub-surface water transport.

WHEN: Panel: October 20th, 2015, 6 p.m. - 8 p.m.

WHAT: Florida 3.0: Reinventing our Future Exhibition and Panel Discussion

WHERE: Miami Center for Architecture and Design: 100 NE 1st Ave, Miami, FL 33132

WHO: 
•Kai-Uwe Bergmann, Partner BIG Architects
•Daniella Levine Cava, District 8 Commissioner, Miami-Dade County
•Julie Harrington, Director Center for Economic Forecasting and Analysis, Florida State University
•Jayantha Obeysekera, Director Hydrologic & Environmental Systems Modeling Department South Florida Water Management District

The Exhibition is co-curated by Nancy Clark and Martha Kohen and includes work from CHU affiliate member institutions and from the University of Florida Graduate School Of Architecture. For further information, visit MCAD at http://miamicad.org/ and CHU at ConsortiumforHydrogeneratedUrbanism.com. For questions, contact MCAD or Nancy Clark at nmclark@ufl.edu.

Florida stands at risk of losing trillions of dollars of existing development as a consequence of sea level rise and climate change. The extraordinary circumstance that the state finds itself confronting opens up new opportunities for reinventing our economy and development.
Florida 3.0: Reinventing our Future engages this debate by proposing new urban possibilities framed through the perspective of five priorities: Infrastructure, Mobility, Hydrological Ecosystems, The Resilient City, and The New Economy. The exhibition brings together the research conducted through the Consortium for Hydro-generated Urbanism (CHU) at the University of Florida that is focused on the history and future of Florida's water based settlements and hydro-environments within the broader context of new paradigms for the evolution of cities on water from around the world. Commissioner Levine Cava will join a team of panelists to discuss creating a thriving, resilient community in the face of climate change induced sea level rise. Participants will learn about innovative solutions such as drawing energy from the Gulf Stream or creating visually exciting pumps which are both functional and aesthetic.

Friday, October 09, 2015

Gov. Scott Fails Florida, Again ... by gimleteye


“Florida’s 900 freshwater springs bring families, visitors and job creators to our state,” Florida's Governor Rick Scott said on Monday as he made another announcement that papers over the truth; this time, related to the failure of the state to protect Florida's fresh water resources. "Over the last three years," the governor said, "We have invested record funding for Florida’s springs, and the projects we are announcing today will ensure our springs are protected for future generations to enjoy."

Gov. Scott's claim is no more true than his assertion to be saving the Everglades. His top environmental officer, Jon Stevenson, piled on: "I would like to thank Gov. Scott and the Florida Legislature for providing record funding for springs restoration, and for securing the recurring funding that will allow us to continue to protect springs in the future," DEP Secretary Jon Steverson said.

For a clearer view, Dr. Robert Palmer, Legislative Chair of the Florida Springs Council, responded, "While these springs projects will probably lead to an improvement over the environmental degradation that would occur without them, it is also true that the projects, individually or in combination, will not result in a single Florida spring returning to health. DEP’s measure of success – pounds of nitrogen reduced or gallons of water saved – is flawed. ... More aggressive and imaginative measures are needed. Where are the State’s plans for buying out polluting activities on those lands in North Florida which are critical to the recharge of the aquifer and to the health of springs? Where are the State’s plans for curtailing water use and fertilizer use at the source, rather than allowing polluting activities to continue and attempting to clean them up after the fact? Where is the State’s blueprint for serious water conservation? Until the State acts on these and other fronts, we will continue to see these lists of projects that make the grant recipients quite happy, but which have little prospect for accomplishing the ultimate goal of clean, healthy springs and a clean, healthy aquifer."

The only fluid that runs pure in Tallahassee is nonsense.