Now I ask all of you, if Govenor Rick Scott is presiding over a meeting, how could I be violating copyright law? If it is on the internet how can I not be able to copy it? It is a public record if that asshole Governor and the Cabinet of Florida is in it wouldn't you think that?? What are they trying to hide?
My original video in Gimleteye's post is gone.
Most curiously, the ORIGINAL VIDEO THAT I PULLED MY FOOTAGE FROM IS STILL UP AND YOU CAN SEE WHAT I PULLED OUT at 51 minutes.
So let's get the facts on Gov. Rick Scott's pardon of one William White on June 24, 2015 (see: minute 51:00)
HERE IS WHO MADE SURE YOUTUBE TOOK DOWN MY VIDEO:
"William S. White Chairman U..." This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Florida Legislature/WFSU-TV, agent for copyright enforcement.This is the video they took down. It takes a long time to load. Doesn't work on a phone. I had a copy. NOTE WE DO NOT KNOW THE CHARGES BECAUSE RICK SCOTT INTERRUPTED THE ATTORNEY AND DID NOT LET HER READ THEM INTO THE RECORD. SHE SEEMS SURPRISED. COVER-UP??
5 comments:
It's like the twitter, facebook and Miami Herald bias, when it suits their intent.
Have you seen the wikileaks DNC release? Bernie got screwed over by DWS, they were running fake Trump ads paid for by a PAC and collusion with media giants CBS, WSJ and Politico was out of control.
Welcome to corrupt media, works well with corrupt government and the sheep just graze.
Banks and corporations are killing the American dream.
This pardon and all government activities are suppose to be done in the "sunshine". Does anyone have the felony charges William White was prosecuted for?
Looks like Scott and Erdogan can shake hands, Birds of a feather.
Rick Scott favors censorship and runs the office Florida Governor like a crude backward third world dictator.
I don't see how there can be a copyright violation. WFSU has a contract with state to record this and Supreme Court arguments and both are state institutions. I think it a bogus claim awaiting a challenge.
QUESTION: can it be claimed that its removal is an intentional Sunshine Act violation?
Needs legal research.
Post a Comment