Wednesday, October 27, 2010

NPR, Fox News and Juan Williams: the headscarf and the burka ... by gimleteye

The problem with the Juan Williams affair is not the comment to Bill O'Reilly; that Muslims in full dress on airplanes make him nervous-- but the very confusion that Fox News represents in erasing the line separating news journalism from opinion. Over the course of many years, as the nation became ever more deeply immersed in the cloud of Fox News, NPR bent over backwards to ensure its journalism was free from the taint of opinion irrespective of ideological origin and despite a constant barrage of attacks from the right. NPR has maintained a steadfast even rigid devotion to impartiality in its news broadcasts. (please click, 'read more')

Juan Williams wandered off the NPR reservation when he signed up to be a commentator for Fox News, a news outlet that constantly mixes opinion with journalism. The reaction by NPR brass-- to fire him, for his comment to O'Reilly-- has triggered international handwringing. In my view, Williams could have remained an opinionator on NPR but could not report news or appear on a program that purports to offer news.

Fox News is the most popular "news" outlet on television. It is also the most irresponsible media organization in the United States, allowing its owner Rupert Murdoch and executive Roger Ailes to redefine civil discourse as a matter for poorly educated nitwits with bones to grind and grievances that deliberately stir fact and fiction and base emotions of fear and flight. When I listen to Fox News commentators and imagine the audience soaking in the quasi-facts, it makes me think of herds of cattle organized in feedlots and narrowing chutes.

Juan Williams is a smart guy. I don't fault smart journalists for using and even embracing the Fox News platform (and paycheck) to expose the mass market to a different level of intelligence than the idiots who comprise so much of the Fox "News" lineup. But this confusion of journalism with opinion on Fox has substantially damaged the United States. NPR brass may have done the wrong thing, but I understand how they got there.

As to the substance of Williams' comment, I too have reservations when I see the dress and symbols of Muslim culture on an airplane. But this reaction is substantially different from what I feel when I see Muslim women in burkas. It is an important distinction. They are both symbols of cultural identity, but the burka imposes cultural difference between the observed and the observer on the matter central to Western civilization: individual identity. So while I may feel uneasy on an airplane with Muslim dress, I get over it. The burka, on the other hand, is antithetical to both my belief system and the government that protects all our freedoms. The burka and the headscarf are very different things to me.

This point was driven home in Miami recently at a hot yoga class where students wear bathing suits. At the University of Miami, a fair number of foreign students are from Muslim nations. I recognized the young man next to me as one, from the Mideast. A lot of thoughts crossed my mind, but one that never crossed my mind was to feel uneasy. (I have also taken yoga classes in other cities with Muslim women who wore head scarfs. I thought, too bad for them.) I wondered, for instance, what this young man's life would be like in the future, whether he would be able in his own country later in life to take a yoga class like this one, with people of other colors and cultures or whether it would just be a strange memory of the United States.

I thought how our own nation is built from immigrants and how religious tolerance is hard-wired in our Constitution. I thought how economic desperation tears at the fabric of civil society and how poorly equipped we are to understand each other as people, because corporations have more power than we do. Like the News Corporation. I did not think of Juan Williams at all.

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

I am a Fox and NPR fan. Also watch Chris Matthews. Most who criticize Fox's right leaning bias dismiss the left leaning bias of NPR and sometimes of MSNBC. Fewer of Fox's critics have actually watched it.

As a regular viewer of/listener to all 3, Fox's opinion/analysis, despite having a mostly conservative hosts, is far more balanced than either NPR or MSNBC. (I love to hear Diane Rehm protest that she is neutral - that's how most left leaning folks see themselves.)

All three networks have excellent journalists with biases that one has to decipher in each news story.

Having said all that, the Juan Williams matter really sticks in my craw. Williams is left of center in his views, clearly. But his point about Muslims is sad but true and driven by real life. NPR screwed the pooch on this one and will pay dearly for it from listeners.

Anonymous said...

I almost didn't hit read more, thought it had ended but I am glad I did.

Anonymous said...

anon, 1: you missed the point. It is about separating journalism from opinion. What does Diane Rehm do? Can you tell the difference?

Anonymous said...

"...Fox's opinion/analysis, despite having a mostly conservative hosts, is far more balanced than either NPR or MSNBC."

Wow!

Anonymous said...

That's a cool aid drinker. Rev. Jones, that way.

Anonymous said...

The problem with the whole debate regarding news organizations is that the world has changed. If Teddy Kennedy ran his car off the bridge and killed Mary Jo Kopechne in today's world imagine the reporting.

The fat slob would not have even be let near the Senate building. TMZ would be there, Police and 911 records would be scrutinized and the family would have had access to speak out on the death of their daughter to Fox, CNN, MSNBC, The VIew, People Magazine, Entertainment Tonight, Inside Edition, talk radio, etc.

The problem is not Fox News, the basic problem is that too many people & organizations are now "free" to disseminate information.

Unlike the old days, where a handful of people monopolized all the information & only transmitted to us what they saw "fit to print". In almost all of these cases, these "reporters" or better yet stenographers aligned themselves with the powerful and those with an agenda that which they agreed.

The genie is now out of the bottle & anyone can do news. (& anyone can challenge the content immediately). This is why we know about ACORN, or baseline budgeting where a proposed "cut" in the projected budget increase for a following year used to be called a real cut that would affect education or the poor. The real detail about the "cut" was never exposed and the media let the politician point fingers at the other party and take the blame.

SInce the advent of the alternative media, there is an army of more educated people as to the shenanigans that take place in our government. John Stossel on Fox News did a great expose on how taxes, government and unions adversely affect our economy and economic growth. He balanced it with both sides and quite frankly the defenders of these 3 activities came off with bad arguments. (But hey "You Decide").

Unfortunately, this type of exposure is not tolerated because it puts to bed many myths & makes driving an specific agenda difficult. This is the real reason why Fox is in the cross hairs by even our own President.

Sunlight and exposure is a great purifier. I love what this blog does when it exposes corruption here in Miami.

The whole Fox News meme that it is creating an idiot electorate is wasted energy. If MSNBC was having the same affect on the "great unwashed" as Katie Couric described us out here, there would be cheers from sea to shining sea.

Anonymous said...

Now, let's get back to the issue. After 9/11 people "size each other up" when getting on an airplane. The question always is whether this person could be a problem on the plane, and if so, can he be contained. To say people don't do this, is to deny reality. And if their assessment is a negative one, rather than risk their lives, they may take a different flight.

Anonymous said...

The interesting part (to me) of the Juan Williams issue that I think this story deals with (Listen up, Christine) is the First Amendment's "or abridging the freedom of the press" clause.

We have come to expect 'news' to be impartial. Just give us the who what when where, etc. But I don't think the freedom that was guaranteed to us was necessarily meant for that purpose.

We were supposed to go out and challenge our government and espouse our opinions. If we wanted "Just the facts, ma'am" we might be no better off than the countries we decry for not having a free press.

I know NPR and some other organizations feel there has to be some semblence of impartiality, but why?

Anonymous said...

CABLE NEWS RACE
TUES. OCT. 26, 2010

FOXNEWS O'REILLY 3,734,000
FOXNEWS HANNITY 2,720,000
FOXNEWS GRETA 2,296,000
FOXNEWS BAIER 2,284,000
FOXNEWS SHEP 2,244,000
FOXNEWS BECK 2,154,000
MSNBC OLBERMANN 1,190,000
MSNBC MADDOW 1,087,000
MSNBC O'DONNELL 1,048,000
MSNBC SCHULTZ 724,000
CNNHN GRACE 670,000
MSNBC HARDBALL 628,000
CNN COOPER 591,000
CNN KING 560,000
CNNHN BEHAR 339,000

Anonymous said...

I just hate it when mommy and daddy fight!!

Anonymous said...

Okay. So what do the moderates watch?

I don't watch more than an hour of tv a week and it is now of those people on that list. So where do I go for reporting that does allow me to digest the material and think for myself?

Anonymous said...

I think it is so elitist to say that Americans are dumb. For some reason people who lean left are the only smart ones who know what is going on. I am so tired of people declaring if you don't think like me you are stupid. It would be so refreshing to have the argument framed differently. Fox is popular for many reasons and somehow, it seems to me,it can't be just because Americans are dumb.

Anonymous said...

Did you ever hear of reading news on line or in paper form? That would help. Fox news enforces prejudices people already have. There is 'no' new news to be had.

Anonymous said...

Andrew Sullivan: "You can't talk about all media companies. There are all media companies and then there’s Fox News. On Fox News, if you say something bigoted, you get rewarded, you get promoted, and you get celebrated. And that is a direct strategy. That's a media strategy."

See the clip here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HecKvjVB0JY