 |
| This is so High School.... |
Addressing Corporate leaders:
Cuban said the best advice is to put your country first — perhaps an ironic bit of advice from a man opposed to the president whose motto is, "America First."
“Do what you think is right,’’ Cuban said. “Be an American citizen first.
“In the bigger scheme of things, our country benefits from peaceful activism a lot more than it benefits from one more shoe being sold, or one more basketball ticket being sold, for that matter...’
4 comments:
He is a lowly developed personality. No one who is well-developed criticizes others on an on-going basis. This is taught to children early on in their development. Somehow he wasn't taught this in his early development years nor did he pick it up in his socialization with others in the larger society. Each time he does it to someone it reinforces what we are dealing with. The head of the free world should operate with a poker face, making friends with everyone, always keeping your own counsel and your thoughts to yourself. The only time we need to hear from him is on various governmental operations that he is charged to manage. How he feels about people, and other bs doesn't matter.
I think you are right about focus. The media needs to begin to ignore these tweets, and begin to focus on exactly what the executive branch is doing, and what it plans to do.. Remember the legislative branch makes the laws, and the judicial branch interprets the law. What they do is all on paper and talk. But it is the executive branch that executes, implements, and actually makes things happen. So the action is in the executive branch. With these awful secretaries in place, we need to know what's going on in each of their departments. The media should not be distracted from the real action in the executive branch by childlike tweets.
No. we need to see the tweets. If your president writes them and posts them pubically we need to know he is unstable
OK look at them but spend most of the time looking at what they are doing. The executive branch has great latitude under the law for iimplementation of those laws. For example, they could move budget money around, reorganize staff, set performance and evaluation goals, and have many options at their disposal to hurt people but be in compliance with the law. With VISAs they could slow that whole operation down by cutting staff, transferring the high performers out to the deportation function, and keeping workers who are slow but very thorough. With fewer Visa workers most of them slow-performance workers, and detailed guidelines for extreme vetting, that whole process could be easily slowed down. For deportation they could simply increase the budget, give them more resources, place high performers there, set quantitative deportation goals, and various incentives for goal-achievement. So we need to know what they are doing. Enough bs, I want to know what is really going on.
Post a Comment