Tuesday, August 28, 2012

America's economic woes tie directly to suburban sprawl ... by gimleteye

A former mayor of Ventura, California takes the same whack as EOM, at the costs of suburban sprawl and the damage it inflicted on the US economy. Yes our views are going mainstream. The following commentary is straight from the middle of CNN.

The writer, William Fulton, is the former mayor of Ventura, California. It bears noting that Ventura land use and zoning restrictions requiring popular vote on major land use changes -- were the foundation of Florida Hometown Democracy, the incipient citizen revolt against the unallocated, unabsorbed, and undisclosed costs of suburban sprawl. The Florida Chamber of Commerce, Associated Industries of Florida, and the Florida legislature plus candidates for Florida governor at the time, all united to defeat Florida Hometown Democracy in 2010.

On this blog we not only argued in favor of FHD, we also argued that the advocates of sprawl organized their political strategies in Florida during the 1980's and 1990's and the leadership of Jeb! Bush, two term former governor.

These ties -- between the national economic crisis, budget emergencies at all levels of government, and mainly (but not exclusively) GOP politics-- are extraordinarily deep. Our criticism regularly generates responses from anonymous readers who believe we overstate the case against sprawl.

Mr. Fulton writes, "Balanced budgets don’t just happen. They happen because someone took the time upfront to check the costs and to evaluate what we can afford and what will add the most value."

Florida's development community, its lobbyists, lawyers and trade associations long ago gave up on evaluating what would have added the most value to Florida. None of the Tea Party rhetoric or GOP canards could stand up to rigorous analysis. What stands in its place is glossing over the costs, dodging accountability, eroding laws nominally intended to protect public health and welfare, and engaging in a full throated roar for American exceptionalism which is really (USA! USA!) a race to the bottom. The economic crisis allowed politicians to get away with saying that "jobs" are the highest priority, when the true cause of this "soft depression" is the Growth Machine itself.

We have noted, on Eye On Miami, how the economic crisis has opened the way -- through the rabid endorsement of deregulation of land use planning from the state to the local levels -- to more sprawl, not less. In other words, we have learned nothing.

Part of the reason that American politics are so hardened today is that the phenomenon of suburban sprawl-chased-into-a-bankrupt-banking and mortgage system has stiffened the resistance of those who would otherwise be held accountable for the massive damage to the US consumer and middle class. They don't want their names revealed. They hide behind corporate prerogatives.

Ask any of them, and they will tell you that today's economic problems were decades in the making. The notion that somehow President Obama should be blamed and voted out of office because he could not re-direct the national economy that still turns on a dime for sprawl is ridiculous. Click 'read more' for the Fulton editorial.

The cost of America’s inefficient sprawl
By William Fulton, Special to CNN

Editor’s note: William Fulton is vice president for policy and programs at Smart Growth America, and a former mayor of Ventura, California. The views expressed are his own.
Earlier this month, Global Public Square addressed a critical issue at this moment in American history, as towns and cities nationwide look to bounce back from the recession.

“Why are U.S. cities going bankrupt?” is a question everyone should be asking, but the real answer isn’t necessarily as straightforward as the one Fareed Zakaria suggested.

Or perhaps it might be even simpler, depending on how you look at it.

It’s true that pensions are an increasingly visible strain on city budgets. As the former mayor of Ventura – a California city that is not going bankrupt – I can attest that rapidly rising pension costs are a huge problem. But there are other, more fundamental factors driving cities to bankruptcy. Dealing with the underlying causes of poor revenue creation and out-of-control debt accumulation is a more nuanced – but ultimately more effective – solution to our country’s economic woes.

The way in which we plan and build our towns and cities has a direct impact on how well they do. Financial resiliency and prosperity is woven into the very fabric of cities. Where businesses go, where houses go, where roads go, where sidewalks go, where farms and natural spaces go – all of these things collectively affect a community’s economic performance and the cost of providing services there.

Put things closer together, the services cost less. Put things farther from each other, the services cost more for the jurisdiction and its taxpayers. But in the case of many American towns and cities, we haven’t always planned and built in this fiscally conservative way – and that’s one of the biggest reasons why cities are struggling today.

When sprawling new development happens, it’s easy to mistake that for prosperity. New buildings and wide roads look great when they first meet the eye. But over time, distant development costs more, gradually bleeding taxpayers and putting the hurt on municipal budgets.

Think about it. Every time a new, spread-out subdivision is built far away from existing infrastructure, somebody has to pay for a bunch of roads that serve a small number of residents. And sewer and water lines too. And fire trucks that must travel farther to serve fewer people. And police cars. And ambulances. And school buses. And dial-a-ride buses. And – in many parts of the country – snowplows.

The cost is enormous. One study in Charlotte, North Carolina, found that a fire station in a low-density neighborhood serves one-quarter the number of households and at four times the cost of an otherwise identical fire station in a less spread out neighborhood. That sort of inefficiency adds up and multiplies as you take into account the hundreds of services cities must provide. What seems cheap on the one hand isn’t always when you look at it over the long haul.

Cities can sometimes stay in the black temporarily by approving new development and getting new revenue to pay for the costs. But that’s really just a Ponzi scheme. When a real estate bust hits – as it did starting in 2008 – there’s no more new development to subsidize sprawling development, and cities start to run in the red. That’s partly what happened in Stockton and San Bernardino.

There’s no silver bullet to fixing financial issues, especially ones as endemic as those facing America’s towns and cities. But planning for the long-term, investing in existing communities, building in a fiscally prudent way and examining changes to real estate market demand are essential first steps.

Balanced budgets don’t just happen. They happen because someone took the time upfront to check the costs and to evaluate what we can afford and what will add the most value. When we do a better job building with the future in mind and investing in what matters, rising pension costs and other secondary concerns will be more manageable.


Grayland said...

There's much to bite on here. Firstly, I want and support environmental protections, especially in Florida where are Natural Resources are a huge part of our Tourism. Agriculture is another huge part of our economy & food supply, which developers love paving over because the land is cheaper than infill development.

Let's go back to Clinton when he signed NAFTA and something to the affect of the home ownership act (I don't remember what it was called). That's where ground zero started. The farmer's were finding it almost unaffordable to farm and the sitting president wanted more home ownership with lower down payments. City's started annexing, developers started buying farmland & concurrency went out the window. Jobs? Perhaps temporary construction work was plentiful, then the Chinese drywall issues and so much more. Roads? If they can't be in concurrency, the BCC or FDOT said let's make the wider (Krome Avenue for example).

I'm glad everything has slowed down but I don't think the politicians in power learned anything, or not much. Perhaps a few have taken a step back. However, it will be short lived.

I don't see the economy improving much for a while. The current sitting president was very busy with healthcare laws when our economy was near depression. The bail out of the auto industry did save jobs (and the unions) but how many retirees & pensions lost out who were long time bond holders & stock holders? I know many people who were long time GM stockholders, relying on those dividends for years who lost much to this "bailout".

And, please, this is my opinion - no one has to feed me TV news for me to form one. I can read and filter facts as I see them.

Anonymous said...

Thank you Grayland for your informed response.

The instant I saw these words: "The following commentary is straight from the middle of CNN." I was turned off.

You said it very well...Thanks!

Anonymous said...

Kelly Penton and disgraced Mayor Manny Diaz fought Homeland Democracy.