First it was that twit David Rivera. Now Republicans have installed Erik Fresen as the head of the Miami-Dade Republican party.
Most of us relocated to Florida because we thought it a paradise. We loved the vistas, the fishing, the swimming, the stately palms, the lush foliage, the sumptuous tropical fruits, the flowers in winter, and the pristine beaches. Instead the Miami Dade Republican party heads are zeroed in on gambling as our top priority (that is when they aren't focused on paving over paradise). The Republican brass don't care why voters live here nor do they care to preserve the riches of nature that most of us value. They care about how they can get money in their OWN pockets with gambling. Most of these West Miami politicians are losers (Rubio, Fresen and Rivera had little net worth and 3 of them were/are facing foreclosure, Fresen also having a federal tax lien) with making money for their pockets as their number 1 goal (Rubio - Power is his priority).
I think it unseemly that Erik Fresen--Party leader --is promoting gambling - hailing an opinion yesterday allowing for expanded gambling. He is pushing full scale gambling with a vengeance, like his predecessor David Rivera who got gambling's foot in the door. Neither of these guys have ever even given lip service to preserving the Floridian qualities of paradise -- why we came to live here, why people stay.
The Fresen Model: Let flooding, polluting, unbridled growth, reduce regulation to foul our natural resources and let corporate greed continue to destroy Florida as we know it...as long as we get gambling. Friggin' A-hole.
More on David Rivera;
Friday, October 07, 2011
Florida Sportsman lashes out against mercury pollution ... by gimleteye
Yesterday, Florida DEP issued the following press release: " Florida Governor Rick Scott, Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Secretary Herschel T. Vinyard Jr. and South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) Executive Director Melissa Meeker today met with U.S. Department of Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Deputy Secretary of Civil Works Jo Ellen Darcy and U.S. Department of Justice Assistant Attorney General Ignacia Moreno to reaffirm Florida’s long-standing commitment to restoring America’s Everglades. During a meeting of state and federal principals, Florida’s Governor outlined a strategy for improving water quality and sending cleaner water south to the vast ecosystem, while protecting jobs and the state’s economy."
Did they talk about methyl mercury and the threat to pregnant women and children. Much of the worst toxin is flowing out of Big Sugar: the state's largest polluter. Read an editorial from Florida Sportsman from October's edition. There are some things we can agree upon, can't we?
Did they talk about methyl mercury and the threat to pregnant women and children. Much of the worst toxin is flowing out of Big Sugar: the state's largest polluter. Read an editorial from Florida Sportsman from October's edition. There are some things we can agree upon, can't we?
Rare Breed: Hot Guy Talking About Rare Miami Coral Found at Soon-to-Be Dredged Port. Geniusofdespair
I would usually classify this as a "yawn" but this marine biologist guy is too good to look at to get bored. I also thought his hairdo was rather unique. I suggest you look at his video below.
Here is what Colin Foord talks about in this video...
Thursday, October 06, 2011
Charlie Cook Election Briefing in DC ... by gimleteye
Charlie Cook briefing on elections in DC this morning.
Commissioner Dennis Moss's Financial Disclosure. By Geniusofdespair
The one thing I am seeing in these Financial Disclosure Forms, the County Commissioners are taking a hit on their net worth.
Commissioner Dennis Moss net worth is $243,280 as of December 31, 2010. Just two years before his net worth was double at $477,941. In 2005 his net worth was $213,874.
Most of Moss's hit came in real estate, with his home losing more than half its value and a condo he owned went from $121,100 to $52,740 in 2010.
Moss's salary at his outside employment at the Richmond-Perrine Optimist Club went up slightly from 2008 to 2010 - $61,809.00 to $64,182. (In 2005 he was making $15,000 from Crime Gopher It, Inc. and he also had a teaching job at Miami Dade College - does not indicate how much he earned.
I looked at the new Miami County site of check disbursements for the Richmond-Perrine Optimist Club from Sept. 2006 to the present. The Club got 114 check in that period. In May of 2009 they got a check for $241,655 from the County.
Between March 16, 2007 and July 21, 2011 -- the County paid the Richmond Perrine Optimist Club about $2,300,582. I guess that more than covers Moss's salary. Exactly what does this club do?
COMMISSIONER MOSS RESPONDS
Commissioner Dennis Moss net worth is $243,280 as of December 31, 2010. Just two years before his net worth was double at $477,941. In 2005 his net worth was $213,874.
Most of Moss's hit came in real estate, with his home losing more than half its value and a condo he owned went from $121,100 to $52,740 in 2010.
Moss's salary at his outside employment at the Richmond-Perrine Optimist Club went up slightly from 2008 to 2010 - $61,809.00 to $64,182. (In 2005 he was making $15,000 from Crime Gopher It, Inc. and he also had a teaching job at Miami Dade College - does not indicate how much he earned.
Get this -- the Crime Gopher It job -- he was working for County Commissioner Sally Heyman.) -- (THIS IS RETRACTED, SALLY HEYMAN'S PAGE 2 IN 2005 WAS ATTACHED AS HIS PAGE 2)
I looked at the new Miami County site of check disbursements for the Richmond-Perrine Optimist Club from Sept. 2006 to the present. The Club got 114 check in that period. In May of 2009 they got a check for $241,655 from the County.
Between March 16, 2007 and July 21, 2011 -- the County paid the Richmond Perrine Optimist Club about $2,300,582. I guess that more than covers Moss's salary. Exactly what does this club do?
COMMISSIONER MOSS RESPONDS
Occupy Wall Street: what stories are not being told ... by gimleteye
The mainstream media first ignored and now can't afford to ignore the mass protests organized as "Occupy Wall Street". Fox News "unfair and unbalanced" is out front with what could quickly emerge as a counter-revolt led by Rupert Murdoch. The seedlings are growing at a quickening pace, in ways that are likely to manifest in more police brutality.
American politics is slowly responding to this unaccustomed intrusion. Few in positions of authority will confront media advertisers and big campaign donors.
So Fed Chair Bernanke's comments to Congress yesterday are noteworthy: he acknowledged legitimate grievances of ordinary Americans. Interesting times, given the role the Fed and especially Bernanke's predecessor Alan Greenspan played in arranging the deck chairs on the economic Titanic. Bernanke also pinned the blame on Congress for policies that are prolonging the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.
Another story is the absence of the Tea Party, whatever figment of imagination that is in the minds of Fox News, from the protests. It would be fair to say that the Occupy Wall Street demonstrations call into question exatly what is the Tea Party and who are their leaders and who are their followers. But the media can't focus on that part of the story because -- at least in the Fox News universe -- the Tea Party are "good" protesters.
The New York Times has an interesting story today about another constituency having a hard time working into the Occupy Wall Street phenomenon: unions that have been badly weakened in the United States. Democratic groups like Moveon.org are scrambling to catch up. Fox is trying to fill the vacuum, but it is possible that a real Tea Party will emerge with its own candidates demanding changes to federal laws that grant corporations the same rights as people. Those are the rights, by the way, that allowed the Murdoch empire to consolidate and fierce resistance can be expected to any challenge from any quarter.
American politics is slowly responding to this unaccustomed intrusion. Few in positions of authority will confront media advertisers and big campaign donors.
So Fed Chair Bernanke's comments to Congress yesterday are noteworthy: he acknowledged legitimate grievances of ordinary Americans. Interesting times, given the role the Fed and especially Bernanke's predecessor Alan Greenspan played in arranging the deck chairs on the economic Titanic. Bernanke also pinned the blame on Congress for policies that are prolonging the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.
Another story is the absence of the Tea Party, whatever figment of imagination that is in the minds of Fox News, from the protests. It would be fair to say that the Occupy Wall Street demonstrations call into question exatly what is the Tea Party and who are their leaders and who are their followers. But the media can't focus on that part of the story because -- at least in the Fox News universe -- the Tea Party are "good" protesters.
The New York Times has an interesting story today about another constituency having a hard time working into the Occupy Wall Street phenomenon: unions that have been badly weakened in the United States. Democratic groups like Moveon.org are scrambling to catch up. Fox is trying to fill the vacuum, but it is possible that a real Tea Party will emerge with its own candidates demanding changes to federal laws that grant corporations the same rights as people. Those are the rights, by the way, that allowed the Murdoch empire to consolidate and fierce resistance can be expected to any challenge from any quarter.
Wednesday, October 05, 2011
Thank you Steve Jobs. by Geniusofdespair
Thank you for my first computer -- what was it 64k or 128k? I know it had those big floppy discs. Thank you for my IPod, my IPhone and about a half of dozen other computers. I have always been an Apple user, I have 4 at the moment -- all work but I only use one.
I am so sorry to hear about Job's passing. I will miss him even though I didn't know him personally, I feel like I did, his legacy has always been in my den.
The Miami Herald Performing Arsht Center story: mixed reviews at best ... by gimleteye
Long-time EOM readers know how I feel about the Performing Arsht Center. I am no fan. My gripe goes to the beginning of the controversial project: a building for donors and high society instead of an investment in local arts. How would north of $500 million invested in local art programs, including the schools, improved Miami's economy? We'll never know the answer to that question, because the Herald and the Knight Foundation and Miami's elite got its way. (My gripe is also about transit in the entire area, but the plan is for the whole problem to be buried like the tunnel to the Port of Miami, once the insiders figure out how to shift the needed billions to taxpayers.)
The way the center has performed, financially, is predictable and you can't blame a critic for that. To the extent there is good news, it is based on luck (the Lewis family commitment to the Cleveland Orchestra) but mainly on Broadway road shows. For families that can't make it to NYC, that is good news. But road show monoculture doesn't advance the arts in Miami. This isn't cultural snobbery. It is just a fact. Meanwhile, the diversion of investment and attention by big donors away from local performing arts has compounded the difficulties of a nasty economy.
It is impossible to reconcile the rosy picture of local performing arts painted by the Herald, with the monumental struggles of local performing artists. A more critical and informed view -- that doesn't sound incessantly cheerful or accomplished or desperately forward looking (just wait until Genting "improves" the local arts) would serve Miami better than what passes for Herald journalism on the arts. The Lion King and Shrek the Musical are popular draws that help defray the ongoing losses of the Performing Arsht Center but the fact is that local arts groups are so close to cutting to the budgetary bone, they can scarcely afford to be honest in the press about the disappointments.
The companion story to the Performing Arsht Center in the Herald is "Some arts groups struggle, some succeed in South Florida". Its opening line from a newbie: "Ask anyone with cultural cred and they're tell you: the arts have never been hotter in South Florida."
Correction: ask anyone with cultural cred and budget to meet, and they certainly won't contradict the Herald. But it doesn't mean the Herald should just pander to the local Lion Kings and Queens.
The way the center has performed, financially, is predictable and you can't blame a critic for that. To the extent there is good news, it is based on luck (the Lewis family commitment to the Cleveland Orchestra) but mainly on Broadway road shows. For families that can't make it to NYC, that is good news. But road show monoculture doesn't advance the arts in Miami. This isn't cultural snobbery. It is just a fact. Meanwhile, the diversion of investment and attention by big donors away from local performing arts has compounded the difficulties of a nasty economy.
It is impossible to reconcile the rosy picture of local performing arts painted by the Herald, with the monumental struggles of local performing artists. A more critical and informed view -- that doesn't sound incessantly cheerful or accomplished or desperately forward looking (just wait until Genting "improves" the local arts) would serve Miami better than what passes for Herald journalism on the arts. The Lion King and Shrek the Musical are popular draws that help defray the ongoing losses of the Performing Arsht Center but the fact is that local arts groups are so close to cutting to the budgetary bone, they can scarcely afford to be honest in the press about the disappointments.
The companion story to the Performing Arsht Center in the Herald is "Some arts groups struggle, some succeed in South Florida". Its opening line from a newbie: "Ask anyone with cultural cred and they're tell you: the arts have never been hotter in South Florida."
Correction: ask anyone with cultural cred and budget to meet, and they certainly won't contradict the Herald. But it doesn't mean the Herald should just pander to the local Lion Kings and Queens.
No surprise, Carlos Gimenez is running for Mayor. By Geniusofdespair
Mayor Gimenez opened a campaign account on Monday. I already got invited to a fundraiser -- good luck with that. I think Joe Martinez might not run, he hasn't opened a campaign account and he has to very soon. There are 9 other candidates in the race so far. Only Juan Carlos Bermudez (Mayor of Doral) has raised a considerable sum - $49,755, although that is chump change in a Countywide election. He has already spent $3,000 on internet development and social media. His fund-raising slacked off recently when it should have been gearing up. He might drop out.
I never heard of any of the other 8 candidates.
Also running are the odd number County Commissioners, Registered are: Barbara Jordan, District 1; Audrey Edmonson, District 3; Bruno Barreiro, District 5 (he has 2 challengers - Carlos E. Fontanills Munoz and Ricardo Rodriguez); District 7 no one yet but I expect Xavier Suarez will be running; District 9, no one is registered to run, not even Moss; District 11 only Juan C. Zapapta (Martinez has not declared in either race) and District 13, there are no candidates slated for 2012, I expect Bovo will run and I think he will get a challenger.
Harvey Ruvin is running for clerk and he has a challenger Rubin Young.
Recently formed Political Action Committees (PAC's):
Fiscal Responsibility Now - Chairman Mabel Mizrahi, Hialeah - Formed September 20th. Special Interest: Community Issues.
Concerned Citizens - Chairman Jeffrey Garcia, Coral Gables - Formed August 8th. Special Interest: Community Preservation.
Hialeah Deserves Better - Chairman Alex Morales - Formed August 22.
None of these groups have reported funds. When they do we will have a better understanding of what they are up to.
I never heard of any of the other 8 candidates.
Also running are the odd number County Commissioners, Registered are: Barbara Jordan, District 1; Audrey Edmonson, District 3; Bruno Barreiro, District 5 (he has 2 challengers - Carlos E. Fontanills Munoz and Ricardo Rodriguez); District 7 no one yet but I expect Xavier Suarez will be running; District 9, no one is registered to run, not even Moss; District 11 only Juan C. Zapapta (Martinez has not declared in either race) and District 13, there are no candidates slated for 2012, I expect Bovo will run and I think he will get a challenger.
Harvey Ruvin is running for clerk and he has a challenger Rubin Young.
Recently formed Political Action Committees (PAC's):
Fiscal Responsibility Now - Chairman Mabel Mizrahi, Hialeah - Formed September 20th. Special Interest: Community Issues.
Concerned Citizens - Chairman Jeffrey Garcia, Coral Gables - Formed August 8th. Special Interest: Community Preservation.
Hialeah Deserves Better - Chairman Alex Morales - Formed August 22.
None of these groups have reported funds. When they do we will have a better understanding of what they are up to.
Tuesday, October 04, 2011
U.S. Century Bank: A Sign From God...The Non-Trusting God. By Geniusofdespair
I don't know about your bank, but I have never seen a sign like this at any bank except U.S. Century Bank. Are they paranoid or what? I can see the NO GUN ban (how are they going to check) but a sunglasses ban in Florida? Even though the sign depicts no sunglasses, I'll bet a white woman wearing them gets right in and a black guy gets thrown out. In my opinion, I bet they enforce the baseball hat and sunglasses ban selectively. I find this sign sort of offensive. It would be interesting to test my theory that they enforce these rules racially. BTW, when I took this picture, they came out to check on me.
Occupy Wall Street: will the real Tea Party please stand up? ... by gimleteye
Yesterday's New York Times coverage of the protest movement, Occupy Wall Street, ends with a quote: "... there is a tension between this emotionally powerful movement... and the emptiness of the message itself so far."
The message isn't empty. The live stream feed of the movement has a compelling video, "Which Side Are You On". The video shows the massive police / robocop response to the protesters at the G-20 meeting in Pittsburgh. It recalls one of the most shameful moments in recent Miami history: the police response to the FTAA protests in 2003 when school teachers and retirees and students were herded on the streets downtown.
On the one hand, the police -- armed to the teeth-- were only doing their job. But what was that job? It wasn't just to enforce law and order. It was also to lend authority to suppression of a populist movement challenging a political and economic status quo that deformed our democracy.
In contrast to the free trade opponents, it is noteworthy that the Tea Party -- a political movement that presumably arose after the 2008 election -- is mainly the Republican Party and has been nowhere visible in the Occupy Wall Street demonstrations. As currently constructed, the Tea Party responds to funders from the radical right, including the Koch empire (that was featured in two fascinating news reports yesterday. One, in Counterpunch, deserves wide distribution: Koch Entertained Justice Thomas At His Private Club.)
Yesterday in Huffington Post, Josh Silver writes, "For the past forty years, the expansion of unchecked corporate power has taken over Washington and state capitals. Armies of industry funded lobbyists, PR firms, think tanks, fake "Astroturf" groups and billions in campaign contributions have quietly corrupted a vulnerable system of government and seized control.
This juggernaut has decimated basic consumer protections and created the biggest gap between rich and poor since the Great Depression. It created the financial meltdown and the Great Recession. It is why nearly 50 million Americans lack health insurance. It has created a political system that is more like a heroin addict: dependent on billions of dollars that determine who gets elected, which laws get passed, and which don't. Both major political parties are addicted and beholden."
Silver finds hope in a meeting last week, sponsored by Harvard Law School: "Conference on the Constitutional Convention". The co-chairs of the meeting, Larry Lessig and Mark McKinnon write: "Even if 34 states don’t call for a convention, history teaches that a real threat is often enough to get Congress to act. The only amendment in our history that changed the structure of Congress (the 17th, making the Senate an elected body) was proposed by Congress because the states were close (just one state short) to calling for a convention. If nothing else, the possibility of a body they can’t control is enough to get Congress to pay attention." (Watch Lessig's "Are Corporations People?" on YouTube.)
Citing that 76 percent of Republicans and 85 percent of Democrats opposed the Citizens United decision by the US Supreme Court-- that unleashed a tsunami of special interest money into a campaign and electoral system that is already badly deformed-- Silver calls for "the right and left (to) abandon the polarizing rhetoric from our leaders and our TV screens and join hands in support of a 21st century democracy reform agenda that reclaims our government from moneyed special interests. The future of our nation depends on it."
There is a message of hope and it is not an empty message.
The message isn't empty. The live stream feed of the movement has a compelling video, "Which Side Are You On". The video shows the massive police / robocop response to the protesters at the G-20 meeting in Pittsburgh. It recalls one of the most shameful moments in recent Miami history: the police response to the FTAA protests in 2003 when school teachers and retirees and students were herded on the streets downtown.
On the one hand, the police -- armed to the teeth-- were only doing their job. But what was that job? It wasn't just to enforce law and order. It was also to lend authority to suppression of a populist movement challenging a political and economic status quo that deformed our democracy.
In contrast to the free trade opponents, it is noteworthy that the Tea Party -- a political movement that presumably arose after the 2008 election -- is mainly the Republican Party and has been nowhere visible in the Occupy Wall Street demonstrations. As currently constructed, the Tea Party responds to funders from the radical right, including the Koch empire (that was featured in two fascinating news reports yesterday. One, in Counterpunch, deserves wide distribution: Koch Entertained Justice Thomas At His Private Club.)
Yesterday in Huffington Post, Josh Silver writes, "For the past forty years, the expansion of unchecked corporate power has taken over Washington and state capitals. Armies of industry funded lobbyists, PR firms, think tanks, fake "Astroturf" groups and billions in campaign contributions have quietly corrupted a vulnerable system of government and seized control.
This juggernaut has decimated basic consumer protections and created the biggest gap between rich and poor since the Great Depression. It created the financial meltdown and the Great Recession. It is why nearly 50 million Americans lack health insurance. It has created a political system that is more like a heroin addict: dependent on billions of dollars that determine who gets elected, which laws get passed, and which don't. Both major political parties are addicted and beholden."
Silver finds hope in a meeting last week, sponsored by Harvard Law School: "Conference on the Constitutional Convention". The co-chairs of the meeting, Larry Lessig and Mark McKinnon write: "Even if 34 states don’t call for a convention, history teaches that a real threat is often enough to get Congress to act. The only amendment in our history that changed the structure of Congress (the 17th, making the Senate an elected body) was proposed by Congress because the states were close (just one state short) to calling for a convention. If nothing else, the possibility of a body they can’t control is enough to get Congress to pay attention." (Watch Lessig's "Are Corporations People?" on YouTube.)
Citing that 76 percent of Republicans and 85 percent of Democrats opposed the Citizens United decision by the US Supreme Court-- that unleashed a tsunami of special interest money into a campaign and electoral system that is already badly deformed-- Silver calls for "the right and left (to) abandon the polarizing rhetoric from our leaders and our TV screens and join hands in support of a 21st century democracy reform agenda that reclaims our government from moneyed special interests. The future of our nation depends on it."
There is a message of hope and it is not an empty message.
Bruno Barreiro: Reversal of Fortune. By Geniusofdespair
Looking at his Financial Disclosure Form dated 12/31/2007, County Commissioner Bruno Barreiro was sitting pretty with a net worth of $1,365,496.70. Now his net worth -- as of 12/31/2010 -- is $470,757. That is about a third of his 2007 net worth.
His 1.25 acre of land that he estimated as worth $200,000 in 2007 is now worth $43,750. His Miami Beach condo and his home are both worth less than half of what they were in 2007. The condo he has on Ocean Drive, he is estimating it is worth $134,490 now, in 2007 it was worth $298,860. Don't feel too bad for him, he only paid $115,000 in 1994 so at least he isn't in a hole.
His salary at his family's home health care company has increased slightly from $90,500 to $106,000.
He has a business called BABJ Investments Corp. in which he invests in real estate. He had $367,111 stock in this company in 2007 and $142,674 in 2010. However, it looks like he used money from BABJ to start an investment plan for $142,150.88.
I think Bruno can feel our financial pain.
His 1.25 acre of land that he estimated as worth $200,000 in 2007 is now worth $43,750. His Miami Beach condo and his home are both worth less than half of what they were in 2007. The condo he has on Ocean Drive, he is estimating it is worth $134,490 now, in 2007 it was worth $298,860. Don't feel too bad for him, he only paid $115,000 in 1994 so at least he isn't in a hole.
His salary at his family's home health care company has increased slightly from $90,500 to $106,000.
He has a business called BABJ Investments Corp. in which he invests in real estate. He had $367,111 stock in this company in 2007 and $142,674 in 2010. However, it looks like he used money from BABJ to start an investment plan for $142,150.88.
I think Bruno can feel our financial pain.
Monday, October 03, 2011
I guess it was just me Eddie Borrego was hiding from. By Geniusofdespair
See my post below about him....
He didn't want me photographing him but I guess with Michelle it was okay.
He didn't want me photographing him but I guess with Michelle it was okay.
Media wrongly paints "Occupy Wall Street" as American "Arab Spring" ... by gimleteye
For nightly network news to portray "Occupy Wall Street" as our own "Arab Spring" is like putting honey out for bears. Good for bears. Bad for people.
NBC last night trotted out some expert no one ever heard of, drawing parallels between disaffecting youth. That is wrong. As flat out wrong as the notion to the unemployed, under-employed, or educated college students with no job prospects, that the economy is in risk of a "double dip recession". Watch the television images from the networks: the visuals are picking out "hippies" in the crowd. In the Daily News, Mike Lupica writes, "There were college kids down here, and old hippies in a world where you don't even hear that word - hippies - much anymore. There were Vietnam vets who marched against that war once, and young women in sleeping bags and guys handing out a broadsheet newspaper with this headline on the front: "Declaration of the Occupation."
Some history of bear traps like this. Those television images of hippies marching against the war in Vietnam in the late 1960's and early 1970's helped transform the right-wing in America. Up to that point, the right-wing had been mainly organized around segregationist John Birchers. A 2005 article from AlterNet by Don Hazen described how the right-wing was transformed: it was "... panic among conservatives, especially in corporate boardrooms, that capitalism was under serious attack, and something drastic had to be done about it. The National Chamber of Commerce asked Lewis Powell, a former head of the American Bar Association and member of 11 corporate boards, to write a blueprint of what had to be done. The result is one the most prescient documents of our time. The memo lays out the framework, the goals and the ingredients for the conservative revolution that has gained momentum and power ever since. Two months after penning the memo, then-President Richard M. Nixon appointed Powell, a Democrat, to the U.S. Supreme Court."
What is so interesting about the current disorganized series of protests is that nothing-- and I mean, nothing-- has been heard from the "Tea Party" whose televised events are staging areas for Republican causes. The Tea Party that is now standing up is a different one, from that co-opted by the radical right, and its organizers need to understand how the media portrayals will fuel the same opposition that arose those long decades ago.
"Powell told the conservatives that they needed to confront liberalism everywhere and needed a "scale of financing only available through a joint effort" focused on an array of principles including less government, lower taxes, deregulation and challenging the left agenda everywhere. The conservative right, starting with seed money from the Coors Brewing family and Richard Mellon Scaife's publishing enterprise, moved forward to implement virtually every element of the Powell memo. It is a story of how the conservatives – in spite of political differences, ego, and competing priorities – were able to cooperate and develop a methodology that drives their issues and values relentlessly.
Starting with just a handful or groups, including the Heritage Foundation, in the early '70s, the conservatives built a new generation of organizations – think tanks, media monitors, legal groups, networking organizations, all driven by the same over-arching values of free enterprise, individual freedoms and limited government."
Eventually and over time, those values became the Potemkin Village through which big government and corporate subsidies deformed democracy. The protesters in NYC and Miami and other cities around the nation ought to be thinking of themselves as the inheritors of the 1773 Boston Tea Party, which followed the complaint of taxation without representation.
Today's parallel and object of protest is a democracy that taxes people more than corporations and empowers corporations over people. The fig leaf of the 2008 Tea Party covers up the fact that the progeny of Powell are radicals and extremists who glorify corporate power and authority: this is the Manifest Destiny of Bush Republicanism that is still, despite the economic crash, alive and well in so many forms because none of powerful interests have been held accountable, at all, for their roles in steering the economy on the reef from which the remnants are being scavenged. (On the tiny scale, in Miami-Dade County, read G.O.D.'s description of the effort, promoted by county commissioner Lynda Bell, to further empower rock miners and big ag in South Miami-Dade over environmentally sensitive lands.)
For a new generation of political activists, some advice: don't let the mainstream media paint you into the same corner as protesters in the 1960's. Those images of latter-day free spirits in Manhattan are meant to serve up old antagonisms that generate significant campaign money at election time for candidates who, among other lies, pose as sympathetic to Tea Party rank and file.
Keep it simple: corporations are not people and must not have the same rights as people. There is a litmus test.
NBC last night trotted out some expert no one ever heard of, drawing parallels between disaffecting youth. That is wrong. As flat out wrong as the notion to the unemployed, under-employed, or educated college students with no job prospects, that the economy is in risk of a "double dip recession". Watch the television images from the networks: the visuals are picking out "hippies" in the crowd. In the Daily News, Mike Lupica writes, "There were college kids down here, and old hippies in a world where you don't even hear that word - hippies - much anymore. There were Vietnam vets who marched against that war once, and young women in sleeping bags and guys handing out a broadsheet newspaper with this headline on the front: "Declaration of the Occupation."
Some history of bear traps like this. Those television images of hippies marching against the war in Vietnam in the late 1960's and early 1970's helped transform the right-wing in America. Up to that point, the right-wing had been mainly organized around segregationist John Birchers. A 2005 article from AlterNet by Don Hazen described how the right-wing was transformed: it was "... panic among conservatives, especially in corporate boardrooms, that capitalism was under serious attack, and something drastic had to be done about it. The National Chamber of Commerce asked Lewis Powell, a former head of the American Bar Association and member of 11 corporate boards, to write a blueprint of what had to be done. The result is one the most prescient documents of our time. The memo lays out the framework, the goals and the ingredients for the conservative revolution that has gained momentum and power ever since. Two months after penning the memo, then-President Richard M. Nixon appointed Powell, a Democrat, to the U.S. Supreme Court."
What is so interesting about the current disorganized series of protests is that nothing-- and I mean, nothing-- has been heard from the "Tea Party" whose televised events are staging areas for Republican causes. The Tea Party that is now standing up is a different one, from that co-opted by the radical right, and its organizers need to understand how the media portrayals will fuel the same opposition that arose those long decades ago.
"Powell told the conservatives that they needed to confront liberalism everywhere and needed a "scale of financing only available through a joint effort" focused on an array of principles including less government, lower taxes, deregulation and challenging the left agenda everywhere. The conservative right, starting with seed money from the Coors Brewing family and Richard Mellon Scaife's publishing enterprise, moved forward to implement virtually every element of the Powell memo. It is a story of how the conservatives – in spite of political differences, ego, and competing priorities – were able to cooperate and develop a methodology that drives their issues and values relentlessly.
Starting with just a handful or groups, including the Heritage Foundation, in the early '70s, the conservatives built a new generation of organizations – think tanks, media monitors, legal groups, networking organizations, all driven by the same over-arching values of free enterprise, individual freedoms and limited government."
Eventually and over time, those values became the Potemkin Village through which big government and corporate subsidies deformed democracy. The protesters in NYC and Miami and other cities around the nation ought to be thinking of themselves as the inheritors of the 1773 Boston Tea Party, which followed the complaint of taxation without representation.
Today's parallel and object of protest is a democracy that taxes people more than corporations and empowers corporations over people. The fig leaf of the 2008 Tea Party covers up the fact that the progeny of Powell are radicals and extremists who glorify corporate power and authority: this is the Manifest Destiny of Bush Republicanism that is still, despite the economic crash, alive and well in so many forms because none of powerful interests have been held accountable, at all, for their roles in steering the economy on the reef from which the remnants are being scavenged. (On the tiny scale, in Miami-Dade County, read G.O.D.'s description of the effort, promoted by county commissioner Lynda Bell, to further empower rock miners and big ag in South Miami-Dade over environmentally sensitive lands.)
For a new generation of political activists, some advice: don't let the mainstream media paint you into the same corner as protesters in the 1960's. Those images of latter-day free spirits in Manhattan are meant to serve up old antagonisms that generate significant campaign money at election time for candidates who, among other lies, pose as sympathetic to Tea Party rank and file.
Keep it simple: corporations are not people and must not have the same rights as people. There is a litmus test.
Lynda Bell's Eddie Borrego: You Can't Run And You Can't Hide. By Geniusofdespair
I have a message for Eddie Borrego, County Commissioner Lynda Bell's Chief of Staff. A delicate message to be sure.
Eddie, if you don't want people to know you are at a meeting, hiding your face will not work. EVER! I was very interested to see who would show up at the first Wetland Advisory Task Force hearing - Lynda Bell's one-woman attack on DERM (County Department of Environment Resource Management*).
Of course, you showed up Eddie - no other Commissioner Aide was there - but you quickly left after I snapped your photo.
Also at the meeting was Kerri Barsh of Greenberg Traurig who represents White Rock Quarries. Yep, the lady with the polka dots is there for the rock miners.
Don't kid yourself anyone. This task force is a charade. It is about easing regulation for rock mining and agriculture at the expense of our drinking water. Lynda Bell's campaign was heavy with rock mining donations and she has a lot of friends in agriculture too, like James Humble.
The Wetland rules are mostly in place to guard the purity of our drinking water. According to Alice Pena, a VERY vocal 8 1/2 square mile person, Lynda Bell started the task force because of Alice. Already that smells bad -- starting a committee that is costing taxpayers plenty in staff (there were at least 6 or 7 staff members present) because of one NON-constituent of Lynda's. Why didn't Lynda Bell defer to the Commissioner of the district like the rest of them do? Because she had to make good on her promises, and they weren't to Pena. All the Government agencies (Army Corps, South Florida Water Management District, Derm) and Commissioner Moss have been dealing with Pena for going over a decade now. She is nothing new. I believe the 8 1/2 square mile woman is being used as a pawn, a cover for others who want to water down wetland rules and eliminate permitting requirements for agriculture and rock mining.
It is easier for Agriculture to be changed for other uses after wetlands are filled and destroyed. This is such a sham. Out of the 7 people on the DERM Wetland Advisory Task force, 3 are registered County Lobbyists and one is that Pena woman. That is your majority. The person I liked least was Patricia Baloyra of Broad & Cassel. The one thing you could say 'good' about Baloyra, she dressed better than Barsh.
Also at the meeting was Kerri Barsh of Greenberg Traurig who represents White Rock Quarries. Yep, the lady with the polka dots is there for the rock miners.
Don't kid yourself anyone. This task force is a charade. It is about easing regulation for rock mining and agriculture at the expense of our drinking water. Lynda Bell's campaign was heavy with rock mining donations and she has a lot of friends in agriculture too, like James Humble.
The Wetland rules are mostly in place to guard the purity of our drinking water. According to Alice Pena, a VERY vocal 8 1/2 square mile person, Lynda Bell started the task force because of Alice. Already that smells bad -- starting a committee that is costing taxpayers plenty in staff (there were at least 6 or 7 staff members present) because of one NON-constituent of Lynda's. Why didn't Lynda Bell defer to the Commissioner of the district like the rest of them do? Because she had to make good on her promises, and they weren't to Pena. All the Government agencies (Army Corps, South Florida Water Management District, Derm) and Commissioner Moss have been dealing with Pena for going over a decade now. She is nothing new. I believe the 8 1/2 square mile woman is being used as a pawn, a cover for others who want to water down wetland rules and eliminate permitting requirements for agriculture and rock mining.
It is easier for Agriculture to be changed for other uses after wetlands are filled and destroyed. This is such a sham. Out of the 7 people on the DERM Wetland Advisory Task force, 3 are registered County Lobbyists and one is that Pena woman. That is your majority. The person I liked least was Patricia Baloyra of Broad & Cassel. The one thing you could say 'good' about Baloyra, she dressed better than Barsh.
*The new name of DERM, under Gimenez's 25 Departments, is Permitting, Environment and Regulatory Affairs.
Sunday, October 02, 2011
Occupy Wall Street: the real Tea Party stands up ... by gimleteye
"Occupy Wall Street" is a movement that bears more similarity to the original Tea Party than the political party nurtured in its larval stage by the GOP and its biggest corporate funders. The mainstream press chose to ignore "Occupy Wall Street" for its first week and a half, but the protesters haven't gone away and protests are growing in American cities. As a result, the media can no longer report on the protests as a nameless, faceless response to economic hardships.
On evening news last night, the message frame of the protests painted "Occupy Wall Street" as a generation of leaderless young hippies who don't have a platform or know what they want. That is not true, at least to anyone who has been following the growth of citizen anger or the way the promise of the Tea Party dissolved in the solvent of GOP intervention. The real Tea Party is standing up.
What the protesters want is to limit corporate power under laws that give corporations the same rights as people. These laws have been fixed in place by Congress and US politics since the late 19th century. Corporate power is a central issue of our times, but as news it only bubbles up through the media (owned by massive corporations) infrequently, as during the Citizens United case in which the Bush led US Supreme Court affirmed the huge distortions of the campaign finance system. It doesn't take a lot of searching to find sober eloquent voices who have argued for many years that corporations are too powerful and have deformed democracy.
Eyeonmiami has blogged along this line for the past four plus years; focusing on the role of local permitting and zoning advocated by lobbyists for powerful developers as the small gears meshing into the Wall Street mortgage and derivatives disaster that plunged the US economy into the worst crisis since the Great Depression. Clearly we are not alone.
On evening news last night, the message frame of the protests painted "Occupy Wall Street" as a generation of leaderless young hippies who don't have a platform or know what they want. That is not true, at least to anyone who has been following the growth of citizen anger or the way the promise of the Tea Party dissolved in the solvent of GOP intervention. The real Tea Party is standing up.
What the protesters want is to limit corporate power under laws that give corporations the same rights as people. These laws have been fixed in place by Congress and US politics since the late 19th century. Corporate power is a central issue of our times, but as news it only bubbles up through the media (owned by massive corporations) infrequently, as during the Citizens United case in which the Bush led US Supreme Court affirmed the huge distortions of the campaign finance system. It doesn't take a lot of searching to find sober eloquent voices who have argued for many years that corporations are too powerful and have deformed democracy.
Eyeonmiami has blogged along this line for the past four plus years; focusing on the role of local permitting and zoning advocated by lobbyists for powerful developers as the small gears meshing into the Wall Street mortgage and derivatives disaster that plunged the US economy into the worst crisis since the Great Depression. Clearly we are not alone.
Governor Scott & His DEP: Snap Out Of It! Guest Blog By Kathy Aterno
FAST TRACKING NEW ESTUARY AND COASTAL WATER STANDARDS WON’T HELP OUR COASTAL ECONOMY
Politically derived agendas could destroy Florida’s future economy. In the past month, we have seen the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) get approval from the Feds to create a new class of water quality protections with lower standards than any that have existed before. At the same time, DEP has been rolling out its sorely insufficient proposed standards to regulate how much pollution from toxics like nitrogen and phosphorous is legally allowed to be dumped into our fresh and flowing waters. The agency has barely finished wrecking havoc on our lakes, rivers, streams and canals, and now they want to fast-track another set of deficient standards for our estuaries and coastal waters. DEP plans to release its draft criteria, host only ONE public workshop, allow just two weeks for public comment, and have the criteria finalized all in only three months!
This process will directly impact the health of critical water bodies like Biscayne Bay, Florida Bay and the Keys. Wake up, Miami -- you should be worried!
Why are Governor Scott and DEP rushing through the rulemaking process and cutting out the public? Is it so certain private sectors of our economy will benefit at a cost to us taxpayers? Our coastal communities and tourism-based industries rely on clean and safe water. Residents and business owners with first-hand experience dealing with polluted waters should be engaged to ensure the final product is as strong as possible.
DEP will host ONLY ONE public meeting to take comments on this highly scientific and complicated issue. The meeting will be held on October 4th at Rookery Bay Research Reserve in Naples. As the draft criteria was publically released only five days prior to the public hearing, there is not ample time to weed through all of the documents and find scientists who can give their professional opinion as to the impacts this rulemaking will have on our estuarine and coastal waters. Based on DEP’s current trend and our initial read of the draft documents, we know the proposed criteria will undermine our existing efforts to prevent pollution and restore safe water quality of Biscayne Bay, the Keys, and other important coastal waters.
DEP is moving like the speed of light. The agency released its draft criteria on September 28th, set one meeting to be held on October 4th, and will accept public comment only through October 18th. Why don’t they have additional meetings in Miami- Dade? The Keys? Tampa Bay? It’s outrageous to know that such a serious decision, and one so incredibly important to the future of Florida’s tourism-based economy, beautiful beaches, and natural areas is moving on a bullet train.
I’m not a big gambler, but it’s a sure bet that we’ll have even more polluted water if DEP’s fast-track criteria are adopted during next year’s legislative session -- and that it will cost our local economy, threaten public health, and jeopardize all of the investments we have made to restore our water supply and beautiful native ecosystems. You don’t have to be a politician or a rocket scientist to know that preventing pollution is much cheaper than cleaning it up.
Come on Miami residents -- let’s take back our POWER. Be heard, be aware, and be involved. Please join Clean Water Action’s citizen POWER campaign (Protect Our Water, Economy and Rights) and help bring power back to the people. Stay informed and get involved with decisions that affect your quality of life and pocketbook. Visit Clean Water Action or email power@cleanwater.org today to sign up or learn more.
Politically derived agendas could destroy Florida’s future economy. In the past month, we have seen the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) get approval from the Feds to create a new class of water quality protections with lower standards than any that have existed before. At the same time, DEP has been rolling out its sorely insufficient proposed standards to regulate how much pollution from toxics like nitrogen and phosphorous is legally allowed to be dumped into our fresh and flowing waters. The agency has barely finished wrecking havoc on our lakes, rivers, streams and canals, and now they want to fast-track another set of deficient standards for our estuaries and coastal waters. DEP plans to release its draft criteria, host only ONE public workshop, allow just two weeks for public comment, and have the criteria finalized all in only three months!
This process will directly impact the health of critical water bodies like Biscayne Bay, Florida Bay and the Keys. Wake up, Miami -- you should be worried!
Why are Governor Scott and DEP rushing through the rulemaking process and cutting out the public? Is it so certain private sectors of our economy will benefit at a cost to us taxpayers? Our coastal communities and tourism-based industries rely on clean and safe water. Residents and business owners with first-hand experience dealing with polluted waters should be engaged to ensure the final product is as strong as possible.
DEP will host ONLY ONE public meeting to take comments on this highly scientific and complicated issue. The meeting will be held on October 4th at Rookery Bay Research Reserve in Naples. As the draft criteria was publically released only five days prior to the public hearing, there is not ample time to weed through all of the documents and find scientists who can give their professional opinion as to the impacts this rulemaking will have on our estuarine and coastal waters. Based on DEP’s current trend and our initial read of the draft documents, we know the proposed criteria will undermine our existing efforts to prevent pollution and restore safe water quality of Biscayne Bay, the Keys, and other important coastal waters.
DEP is moving like the speed of light. The agency released its draft criteria on September 28th, set one meeting to be held on October 4th, and will accept public comment only through October 18th. Why don’t they have additional meetings in Miami- Dade? The Keys? Tampa Bay? It’s outrageous to know that such a serious decision, and one so incredibly important to the future of Florida’s tourism-based economy, beautiful beaches, and natural areas is moving on a bullet train.
I’m not a big gambler, but it’s a sure bet that we’ll have even more polluted water if DEP’s fast-track criteria are adopted during next year’s legislative session -- and that it will cost our local economy, threaten public health, and jeopardize all of the investments we have made to restore our water supply and beautiful native ecosystems. You don’t have to be a politician or a rocket scientist to know that preventing pollution is much cheaper than cleaning it up.
Come on Miami residents -- let’s take back our POWER. Be heard, be aware, and be involved. Please join Clean Water Action’s citizen POWER campaign (Protect Our Water, Economy and Rights) and help bring power back to the people. Stay informed and get involved with decisions that affect your quality of life and pocketbook. Visit Clean Water Action or email power@cleanwater.org today to sign up or learn more.
Saturday, October 01, 2011
Florida Senator Mike Fasano - Is He A Worthy Republican? Better than 99% of Them. By Geniusofdespair
Granted I don't follow State politics very well, focused as I am on the County, but this guy Mike Fasano does a lot of good votes and is on the right side of many issues -- for a Republican -- Like Charlie Crist. Here are 3 examples.
1. He voted AGAINST re-legalizing what Howard Troxler of the St. Pete Times called "a bygone and corrupt institution, outlawed in this state for more than two decades, known as leadership funds. These "leadership funds" are campaign slush funds operated legally and officially by the leaders of the Legislature themselves".
Leadership funds allow campaign contributions of $50,000 for each legislative race and $250,000 for a Statewide race. That is up from $500 - that was the legal limit from one donor. Quite a difference isn't it? Crist had vetoed Leadership Funds, but Scott didn't. Miami-Dade's Miguel Diaz de la Portilla proposed SB1690.
2. Mike Fasano is rightly livid over a $10,000 bill he was socked with to view public records from the State's Pension Fund. Remember he is a STATE SENATOR - A Chair of a Budget Sub-Committee. He should get any documents that he wants to see FOR FREE. He said: "I am being given an invoice for $10,000 to pay for information pertaining to Florida's investment decisions." Gives you little hope for you and me to get public records, doesn't it?
3. Fasano was jubilant today that a judge wouldn't allow the prisons to be privatized in the sneaky manner the Pubs resorted to. Remember again: He is the Chairman of the Senate Budget subcommittee in charge of prison spending. Fasano said: "This is a perfect example of why we should not be making major policy changes in proviso language that did not go through substantive committees, debated and taken testimony and pro and con."
4. He pushed for the prescription drug monitoring program to curtail the "Pill Mills" that the Governor wanted to scrap. Video of Mike talking about it. Watch it: Future Governor material??
Mike Fasano, brings some sanity to the Senate...for a Republican. I know I won't always agree with him (his Bills are lackluster) but he at least has SOME common sense which is more than I can say for most Republicans in Tallahassee.
His Committee assignments:
1. He voted AGAINST re-legalizing what Howard Troxler of the St. Pete Times called "a bygone and corrupt institution, outlawed in this state for more than two decades, known as leadership funds. These "leadership funds" are campaign slush funds operated legally and officially by the leaders of the Legislature themselves".
Leadership funds allow campaign contributions of $50,000 for each legislative race and $250,000 for a Statewide race. That is up from $500 - that was the legal limit from one donor. Quite a difference isn't it? Crist had vetoed Leadership Funds, but Scott didn't. Miami-Dade's Miguel Diaz de la Portilla proposed SB1690.
2. Mike Fasano is rightly livid over a $10,000 bill he was socked with to view public records from the State's Pension Fund. Remember he is a STATE SENATOR - A Chair of a Budget Sub-Committee. He should get any documents that he wants to see FOR FREE. He said: "I am being given an invoice for $10,000 to pay for information pertaining to Florida's investment decisions." Gives you little hope for you and me to get public records, doesn't it?
3. Fasano was jubilant today that a judge wouldn't allow the prisons to be privatized in the sneaky manner the Pubs resorted to. Remember again: He is the Chairman of the Senate Budget subcommittee in charge of prison spending. Fasano said: "This is a perfect example of why we should not be making major policy changes in proviso language that did not go through substantive committees, debated and taken testimony and pro and con."
4. He pushed for the prescription drug monitoring program to curtail the "Pill Mills" that the Governor wanted to scrap. Video of Mike talking about it. Watch it: Future Governor material??
Mike Fasano, brings some sanity to the Senate...for a Republican. I know I won't always agree with him (his Bills are lackluster) but he at least has SOME common sense which is more than I can say for most Republicans in Tallahassee.
His Committee assignments:
- Budget Subcommittee on Criminal and Civil Justice Appropriations, Chair
- Banking and Insurance
- Budget
- Budget Subcommittee on Transportation, Tourism, and Economic Development Appropriations
- Communications, Energy, and Public Utilities
- Health Regulation
- Military Affairs, Space, and Domestic Security
- Joint Administrative Procedures Committee
Miami Herald: "Man dies after drowning near William Powell Bridge" ... by gimleteye
Well, ok. We bloggers mis-spell and get our grammar wrong, too. But this headline does seem to indicate that someone at the Herald is asleep at the proverbial switch. It's not as good as "Headless body found in topless bar" but once drowned is not twice dead.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
















