Tuesday, January 03, 2012

Ron Paul: Is this photo Photoshopped? By Geniusofdespair

It is right before an election and what surfaces -- a picture of Ron Paul with Derek Black (wearing weird hat), the son of a KKK Grand Wizard who describes himself as a: “white person who is concerned about discrimination against white people.”

The other guy with the crazy eyes is Don Black, Derek's dad, who is on a "List of 16 people worldwide that British Home Secretary Jacqui Smith put on a list of undesirables in October. The list was made public this week (May 2009) and is supposed to include individuals who, Smith says, spread hate and violence." He is married to David Duke's X-wife.

I am not sure the photo is authentic so as a responsible journalist, I am posting the photo.  It comes from a website that is not online anymore that is a red flag and getting two racists in one photo....?? If you are from Iowa, pay attention to it. What am I saying... Hard core Republicans voting today from Iowa will like the photo. Go ahead Iowa, pick our next Republican President. The sorry-ass truth is, Paul isn't the worst candidate. And more sorry-ass than that, the two racists pictured with him are from Florida.

P.S. I found the actual REAL photo so my sleuthing paid off:

16 comments:

Stan said...

I would be more concerned about where the photo was taken. You can walk up to any politician and they will take a photo with you. Ron Paul has no idea who these people are or whether they are idiots.

Anonymous said...

Exactly! Paul has NO IDEA!

WOOF said...

If you do a reverse image search on
http://www.tineye.com/

Here's the search url
http://www.tineye.com/search/60051c4bb2949c5fa7fa14386134f33a2b216598/
you'll find the photo has been around since 2007 .

Anonymous said...

There is a lot to criticize about Ron Paul but this is ridiculous. I remember when first lady Roslynn Carter had her picture taken with John Wayne Gacy. She had no idea that the guy was a serial killer.

Anonymous said...

Correct everybody! But Ron Paul is still a joke!

I am a Black Republican and cannot dismiss "the" remarks in "his" newsletter some time ago which he claims he did not know. If you do not know what is in a publication bearing your name, then why should I vote for you for President?

Nonsense, sheer nonosense! There is no way this man could ever get my vote!

Anonymous said...

Uhh, Genius, 2008 Iowa went 54% - 44% for Obama. Your cockeyed assumption is wrong. Not a good start to the new year.

Geniusofdespair said...

Anonymous 2 back
Iowa VOTERS are not IOWA REPUBLICANS who are voting today. I am talking about Pubs not all voters. You are referring to both parties. Who is making assumptions?

Geniusofdespair said...

You want to point out corrections...don't do it like an asshole that is why you are erased. No mood for you.

I am again switching to Republican just to mess around. I am sure there are plenty more doing the same thing. The only reason Obama was the candidate was because Pubs were convinced he could never win so they supported him over Clinton in the primaries. Primaries are the worst because the radicals are doing the picking. This was suppose to be an amusing nothing post. Thanks for nothing.

James said...

Why can't you simply refer to Republicans as Republicans? The term "pubs" is grating, used only by you, and connotes contempt and condescension.

Geniusofdespair said...

Urban Dictionary: repubican
www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?...
Pubican, Pubs, Fuckin Pubs; slang for Repubican. There is a ground swell of concensus in the ...

Anonymous said...

I find the term Dems grating. Get over it James.

Anonymous said...

Paul probably didn't know who he was taking a picture with but the white supremicists are flocking to him because of his (if not overtly racist, then unbelievably insensitive) comments about race.

Granted, his stiff "all government is bad" philosophy has also garnered the opposite effect when it comes to the war on drugs, but otherwise, calling Abraham Lincoln an Iron Fisted ruler who dragged the country into a sensless war won't even win over conservatives who still like to pretend that they're in the "party of Lincoln"

Geniusofdespair said...

I have no respect for a Libertarian that picks and chooses. It is either no government or not. It is like an animal rights advocate wearing a leather belt.

It is okay for Government to stop abortion? That is not being a Libertarian.

Anonymous said...

What the problem:

Republicans: Pubs
Democrats: Crats

Problem solved.

Anonymous said...

I don't hate everything Paul is saying. He is so far right, he starts to seem like he's left (if that is at all possible). I think that is what has many people scratching their heads.

This will be the year of protectionism and isolationism. We'll discuss those things a lot, in addition to sweater vests, mom jeans, sick children and infidelities - all the stuff that has nothing to do with who the next president should be.

Anonymous said...

www.urbandictionary.com can be edited by anybody that visits the site. Let me guess ... you wrote in pubs, right?