Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Cone of Silence: Going, going...gone? By Geniusofdespair

Well this certainly sucks - Dim County Commissioner Bruno Barreiro, a member of the unreformable majority, put this on the agenda for November 20th:

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY:
Section 1. Section 2-11.1(t) (Cone of Silence) of the Code of Miami-Dade County, Florida, as amended by Ordinance No. 08-111, is hereby repealed in its entirety.

Well, we all know that SOME of the Commissioners didn't follow it but it was still a good idea because it is suppose to "protect the professional integrity of the procurement process by shielding it from undue influences prior to the recommendation of contract award."

This is the description from the County website: It is the policy of Miami-Dade County that a “Cone of Silence” be established on all County competitive selection processes including:

Request for Proposals (RFPs),
Requests for Qualifications (RFQs), and
Bids for the provision of goods and services.
The Cone of Silence prohibits any communication regarding a particular RFP, RFQ or bid solicitation after they have been advertised. This Cone of Silence is designed to protect the professional integrity of the procurement process by shielding it from undue influences prior to the recommendation of contract award.

It establishes a disciplinary and/or penalty process for those who violate the Cone of Silence.

The Cone of Silence is terminated at the time when the County Manager issues a written recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners, or at the time when the issuing department issues its written recommendation to the Manager when the award is within the Manager’s delegated authority.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

If they are Dim what does that say for the electorate that keeps voting for this dimwits?

Anonymous said...

That they are bigger dims...

Geniusofdespair said...

The people vote them in and then go on their merry way without a lick of knowledge of what they are doing. They just need them when they have a pothole and let me tell you the Commission must have a staff of 1,000 pothole fixers because the people are happy!

Anonymous said...

How about Bruno Badhairdo or Bruno Bad-rear-o

Anonymous said...

Lets get a nice dose of reality:

(1) These items are generally passed on first reading, as a rule.

(2) This item will go to a Commission Committee before it goes to the BCC as a whole.

(3) It is very likely, the current version of the Ordinance will be modifyied before it goes back to the BCC.

Lets be honest, the Cone is helpful, but, honestly, the way it is drafted now, it only helps those with intrenched interests at the County. There are some common sense changes that should be made, that will open up the process to more competition. As citizens, we should remain viligent, and ensure what ever changes are made not only have the proper intent, but, that that intent is reflected in practice.

Anonymous said...

There are unintended consequences of the cone of silence, for instance

Manager can't talk to his staff (Dept. Director).

Hope they don't throw it out, just revamp it.

Geniusofdespair said...

This is the text of the last change to "CONE OF SILENCE"

10/7/2008 7A AMENDED Adopted as amended P
REPORT: It was moved by Commissioner Diaz that the foregoing proposed ordinance be adopted as amended as follows: • To delete the underlined language and to resurrect the stricken language on handwritten page 5; • To add a provision that any County staff having permissible communications with an outside entity or person while the Cone of Silence was in effect must make a record of that communication; • To change “department directors” to “the County Mayor or his designee” on handwritten page 7; • To require the County Manager to approve the selection committee’s recommendation or authorize the selection committee to negotiate with the vendor(s) within 30 days after the selection committee forwarded its original recommendation to the County Manager; • To require the County Manager to make a recommendation on a solicitation to the County Commission within 90 days after he received the selection committee’s original recommendation, or to provide the County Commission with a report explaining what delayed him from providing a recommendation within 90 days; • To require that a memorandum detailing the reason(s) the County Manager’s recommendation on a solicitation changed the recommendation of the selection committee. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Sosa, and upon being put to a vote, passed by a vote of 11-2 (Commissioners Martinez and Moss voted "No").

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Section 2-11.1 (t) of the Code of Miami-Dade County, Florida, is hereby amended to read as follows:1
Sec 2-11.1 (t). Cone of Silence.

1. Contracts for the provision of goods and service other than audit and independent private sector inspector general (IPSIG) contracts.

(a) "Cone of Silence" is hereby defined to mean a prohibition on: (i) any communication regarding a particular RFP, RFQ or bid between a potential vendor, service provider, bidder, lobbyist, or consultant and the County's professional staff including, but not limited to, the County Manager and his or her staff; (ii) any communication regarding a particular RFP, RFQ or bid between the Mayor, County Commissioners or their respective staffs and any member of the County's professional staff including, but not limited to, the County Manager and his or her staff; (iii) any communication regarding a particular RFP, RFQ or bid between a potential vendor, service provider, bidder, lobbyist, or consultant and any member of the selection committee therefor; (iv) any communication regarding a particular RFP, RFQ or bid between the Mayor, County Commissioners or their respective staffs and any member of the selection committee therefor; >> and << (v) any communication regarding a particular RFP, RFQ or bid between a potential vendor, service provider, bidder, lobbyist, or consultant and the Mayor, County Commissioners and their respective staffs and (vi) any communication regarding a particular RFP, RFQ, or bid between any member of the County’s professional staff and any member of the selection committee therefore. The County Manager and the Chairperson of the selection committee may communicate about a particular selection recommendation, but only after the committee has submitted an award recommendation to the manager and provided that should any change occur in the committee recommendation, the content of the communication and of the corresponding change >>as well as the reasons for such change<< shall be described in writing and filed by the Manager with the Clerk of the Board and be included in any recommendation submitted by the Manager to the Board of County Commissioners. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Cone of Silence shall not apply to (i) competitive processes for the award of CDBG, HOME, SHIP and Surtax Funds administered by the Miami-Dade County Office of Community and Economic Development and the community-based organization (CBO) competitive grant processes administered by the Park and Recreation, Library, Water and Sewer, and Solid Waste Departments, Cultural Affairs and Tourist Development Councils and the Department of Environmental Resources Management; (ii) communications with the County Attorney and his or her staff; (iii) communications between a potential vendor, service provider, bidder, consultant or lobbyist and employees of the Management and Technical Assistance Unit of the Department of Business Development regarding small business and/or minority business programs, the Community Business Enterprise and Equitable Distribution Programs; (iv) communications between a potential vendor, service provider, bidder, consultant or lobbyist and employees responsible for administering disadvantaged business enterprise programs in County departments receiving federal funds, provided the communications are limited strictly to matters of programmatic process or procedure; (v) duly noticed site visits to determine the competency of bidders regarding a particular bid during the time period between the opening of bids and the time the County Manager makes his or her written recommendation; (vi) any emergency procurement of goods or services pursuant to Administrative Order 3-2; (vii) communications regarding a particular RFP, RFQ or bid between any person and the Vendor Information Center staff, the procurement agent or contracting officer responsible for administering the procurement process for such RFP, RFQ or bid, provided the communication is limited strictly to matters of process or procedure already contained in the corresponding solicitation document; and (viii) [[communications regarding a particular RFP, RFQ or bid between the procurement agent or contracting officer, or their designated secretarial/clerical staff responsible for administering the procurement process for such RFP, RFQ or bid and a member of the selection committee therefor provided the communication is limited strictly to matters of process or procedure already contained in the corresponding solicitation document.]]>>communications between a potential vendor, service provider or bidder and employees of the Department of Procurement Management or other department identified in the solicitation document as the issuing department; and (ix) consultations by employees of the Department of Procurement Management with professional procurement colleagues in determining an appropriate approach or option involving a solicitation in progress.<<

(b) Procedure.

(i) A Cone of Silence shall be imposed upon each RFP, RFQ and bid after the advertisement of said RFP, RFQ or bid. At the time of imposition of the Cone of Silence, the County Manager or his or her designee shall provide for public notice of the Cone of Silence. The County Manager shall issue a written notice thereof to the affected departments, file a copy of such notice with the Clerk of the Board, with a copy thereof to each Commissioner, and shall include in any public solicitation for goods and services a statement disclosing the requirements of this ordinance. [[Notwithstanding any other provision of this Section, the imposition of a Cone of Silence on a particular RFP, RFQ or bid shall not preclude staff from obtaining industry comment or performing market research therefor provided all communications related thereto between a potential vendor, service provider, bidder, lobbyist, or consultant and any member of the County's professional staff including, but not limited to, the County Manager and his or her staff are in writing or are made at a duly noticed public meeting.]]

(ii) The Cone of Silence shall terminate at the time the Manager makes his or her written recommendation to the County Commission; provided, however, that if the Commission refers the Manager's recommendation back to the Manager or staff for further review, the Cone of Silence shall be reimposed until such time as the Manager makes a subsequent written recommendation. The foregoing notwithstanding, for contracts and purchases which the County Manager has the delegated authority to award under Sec. 2-8.1(b) of this Code, the Cone of Silence shall terminate: (i) at the time the award recommendation letter is issued and filed with the Clerk of the Board for such contracts and purchases involving the expenditure of over one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000); (ii) at the time the written award recommendation is posted in accordance with Section III of A.O. 3-21 for such contracts or purchases involving the expenditure of over $25,000 up to $100,000; or (iii) at the time the award recommendation is issued in accordance with Section IV of A.O. 3-21 for contracts and purchases involving the expenditure of $25,000 or less.

(iii) >>While the Cone of Silence is in effect, County Staff shall create a written record of any oral communications with potential vendor, service provider, bidder, lobbyist, or consultant related to or regarding a solicitation, bid, proposal, or other competitive process. The record shall indicate the date of such communication, the persons to whom staff communicated, and a general summation of the communication. This sub-section applies to all communications made while the Cone of Silence is in effect for a particular solicitation. <<.

(c) Exceptions..>> (i)<>(ii) The provisions of this ordinance shall also not apply to oral communications at briefings held by county commissioners and the County Mayor or his designee, after the selection committee or other evaluating group makes its recommendation to the County Manager, provided that the briefings are not intended to influence the outcome of the selection committee or other evaluating group’s recommendation to the County Manager; provided, however that this exception shall not apply to outside groups such as lobbyists or representatives of the responding or bidding companies or entities.<<


2. Audit and IPSIG contracts.

(a) "Cone of Silence" is hereby defined to mean a prohibition on: (a) any communication regarding a particular RFP, RFQ or bid between a potential vendor, service provider, bidder, lobbyist, or consultant and the Mayor, County Commissioners or their respective staffs and any member of the County's professional staff including, but not limited to, the County Manager and his or her staff; and (b) any oral communication regarding a particular RFP, RFQ or bid between the Mayor, County Commissioners or their respective staffs and any member of the County's professional staff including, but not limited to, the County Manager and his or her staff. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Cone of Silence shall not apply to>> (a)<< communications with the County Attorney and his or her staff; >> (b) communications between a potential vendor, service provider or bidder and employees of the Department of Procurement Management or other department identified in the solicitation document as the issuing department; and (c) consultations by employees of the Department of Procurement Management with professional procurement colleagues in determining an appropriate approach or option involving a solicitation in progress. <<

(b) Except as provided in Subsections 2(c) and 2(d) hereof, a Cone of Silence shall be imposed upon each RFP, RFQ and bid for audit and IPSIG services after the advertisement of said RFP, RFQ or bid. At the time of the imposition of the Cone of Silence, the County Manager or his or her designee shall provide for the public notice of the Cone of Silence. The Cone of Silence shall terminate when the County Manager executes a particular audit or IPSIG contract.

(c) Nothing contained herein shall prohibit any bidder or proposer: (i) from making public presentations at duly noticed pre-bid conferences or before duly noticed selection committee meetings; (ii) from engaging in contract negotiations during any duly noticed public meeting; or (iii) from communicating in writing with any County employee or official for purposes of seeking clarification or additional information from the County or responding to the County's request for clarification or additional information, subject to the provisions of the applicable RFP, RFQ or bid documents. The bidder or proposer shall file a copy of any written communication with the Clerk of the Board. The Clerk of the Board shall make copies available to the general public upon request.

(d) Nothing contained herein shall prohibit any lobbyist, bidder, proposer or other person or entity from publicly addressing the Board of County Commissioners during any duly noticed public meeting regarding action on any audit or IPSIG contract. The County Manager shall include in any public solicitation for auditing or IPSIG services a statement disclosing the requirements of this ordinance.

3. Penalties. In addition to the penalties provided in Subsections (s) and (v) hereof, violation of this Subsection (t) by a particular bidder or proposer shall render any RFP award, RFQ award or bid award to said bidder or proposer voidable. Any person who violates a provision of this ordinance shall be prohibited from serving on a Miami-Dade County competitive selection committee. In addition to any other penalty provided by law, violation of any provision of this ordinance by a Miami-Dade County employee shall subject said employee to disciplinary action up to and including dismissal. Additionally, any person who has personal knowledge of a violation of this ordinance shall report such violation to the State Attorney and/or may file a complaint with the Ethics Commission.

4. The requirements of Section 2-11.1(t) shall not apply to any municipality in Miami-Dade County that has adopted an ordinance providing that the cone of silence shall not apply to that municipality. Any municipality that opts out of the requirements of Section 2-11.1(t) shall provide the Ethics Commission with a copy of the ordinance.

5. >>Within thirty days of a recommendation from a selection committee, the County Mayor or his designee shall either appoint a negotiation committee or take other affirmative action with respect to the solicitation, including but not limited to rejection of proposals or recommendation for award. In the event that negotiations have not commenced within thirty days, or if such other affirmative action has not been taken within thirty days, the County Mayor or his designee shall report such event, and the reasons therefore, to the Board of County Commissioners. Additionally, the County Mayor or his designee shall present the Clerk of the Board with a recommendation for award, or a recommendation to reject proposals, within ninety days from the date a selection committee makes a recommendation. In the event that the County Mayor or his designee has not provided such recommendation to the Clerk of the Board within ninety days, the County Mayor or his designee shall provide a report on the status of the solicitation to the Board of County Commissioners, including the reasons for any delay. <<

(Ord. No. 99-1, § 1, 1-21-99; Ord. No. 00-149, § 1, 11-28-00; Ord. No. 01-149, § 1, 9-25-01; Ord. No. 01-150, § 1, 9-25-01; Ord. No. 02-3, § 1, 1-29-02; Ord. No. 04-77, § 1, 4-27-04)


Section 2. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or provision of this ordinance is held invalid, the remainder of this ordinance shall not be affected by such invalidity.