Flying across the country, I ignored at first but slowly became glued to "Arctic Tale"-- a documentary feature filled with superb photography chronicling the difficulty of key species to survive global warming. Tens of thousands of years of habituation to the seasonal cycles and millions of years of evolution are vanishing in the rapidly warming Arctic.
It is difficult enough to focus on climate change, riding a Boeing 757 that joins with tens of thousands of other aircraft in contributing to the man-made disaster. A main story thread tracks the fate of a mother and her two polar bear cubs. The care of the mother for her offspring is so obviously resonant of how we worry for and tend to and push forward our own young.
An unstable ice pack, melting far earlier than normal, forces the mother to abandon her offspring earlier than evolution provided to balance the odds of survival. My flight landed before the movie ended, but what I heard just before the movie clicked off stuck with me: "Leaving her cub earlier that she should have, the mother could not teach the survival skills her cub would need to survive."
I wonder in the context of our own species: will there be a time when mothers and fathers cannot give the next generation the skills it will need to survive?
We are dependent on massively organized infrastructure for modern life. The connections that tie the pieces together are more fragile than people realize. How uncomfortable life can become when we are deprived was demonstrated, yesterday, by a brief power outage of the power grid serving the entire southeast coast of Florida.
The grid failure instantly stopped traffic and otherwise interrupted the lives of millions of residents and visitors.
What would life be like, without the power grid? We know from experience in the aftermath of recent hurricanes. So far the power grid, and the network of comforts we depend on, springs back.
In the future, global warming and its impacts will provide a much more serious test to infrastructure connections including the power grid.
For decades, the polar bear has been an iconic symbol of nature for conservationists. Today its plight is a flashing warning light for all of humanity. The cautionary tale may be attracting select audiences, but it is still falling on deaf ears.
Otherwise, how to explain today's news in Miami? City commissioners are poised to approve two new towering skyscrapers, over 1000 feet tall, in the downtown core. Never mind that real estate markets are under the heaviest pressure, in a century. The story is featured on the front page of The Miami Herald, without a single wisp of concern or doubt.
Taken together: the polar bears, the power outage, and the hubris of Miami civic leaders and elected officials sound clarion bells for change.
The focus for public life should be massive reform of power generation, distributing generation and supply as closely as possible to the end user and to consumers.
Elected officials in places like South Florida should reject building applications and zoning approvals that do not meet the criteria for surviving for long periods of sustained stress on infrastructure; from power generation to water supply. I know, these are big "shoulds".
The polar bear is unlikely to adapt to the pressure of global warming on food supplies. Presumably, we are smart enough to plan strategies to cope.
It is incredibly foolish to imagine that we will be immune or wealthy enough to avoid what threatens the polar bear. You may not be the mother or father who tells your children, tough luck. But your children or grandchildren will experience the costs, they will ask the questions, in which 1000 foot tall skyscrapers in Hurricane Alley will be the height of folly.
9 comments:
The polar bears are not making it back to the ice flows and neither are the parents…as “Miamigal” points out they are all caught in traffic, even if they are headed home to their children, not a given. Yesterday’s powergrid crash put all schools in lock down so the kids themselves wouldn’t get on the roads in their cars without traffic signals working. One was left with a lot of antsy teenagers wondering just what had happened. (Did g.o.d. take his iodine pills?) And who is this guy who wants to leave us his legacy of the highest skyscraper in Miami?
However those who are “mad as hell and just won’t take it anymore,” are batting a thousand compared to another group, as evinced by a disturbing story in the NYTimes. Their attached blog attachment got over 420 comments.
(see: Midlife Suicide Rises, Puzzling Researchers
By PATRICIA COHEN
Published: February 19, 2008)
Oh, “April is the cruelest month,” except in Miami it must be February.
S
Indeed I didn't take my Iodide -- endocrine disruption has gotten to me already. The pill would do me no good.
I am wondering if we are getting the real story from FP&L.
My kids and I bought Artic Tale, took it home, and watched it. Unlike the other movies they want to watch 80 times over, we began to watch it again another day, but couldn't. I tried it alone once, and couldn't do it either. Imagine that it portends of our future as Gimleteye believes.
...distributing generation and supply as closely as possible to the end user and to consumers.
But WE DON"T WANT power generation near the end user. Isn't that right? Or is it a turkey in every oven and a solar cell on every roof?
GoD- what? your prayers for a nuclear meltdown didn't pan out this time? Patience...
Ok that post was downright depressing in its truth. Nicely written!
Any body have a radiation counter/measuring device? Lets test the air/water/environment ourselves. Not to create a panic but to hold FPL responsible. If the government no longer protects us then somebody must be out there to ensure that we are not getting exposed to radiation.
Color me amused:
I did not write this post. I am not Gimleteye.
I have no wish for a nucear meltdown either. I just think that we should decide what we are going to do with nuclear waste, and we should think about energy sources that don't have the potential to destroy our city or our planet. I do see a solar panel on every roof as a positive thing. They are developing highly efficient panels (I think in Japan). My boat battery is being charged by a portable solar panel as we speak.
I don't know why everyone assumes polar bears will starve if they can't eat seals on the Arctic icecap. Polar bears are closely related to grizzly bears (and interbreed with them). Like the grizzly, the polar bear is omniverous. It can and will eat anything a grizzly does.
Also it's not completely clear (despite one bad summer) that the Arctic ice pack is permanently melting. It froze this past fall far faster than normal and is now two million square kilometers larger than the recent winter average. Thanks to temperatures as low as minus 50 degrees Centigrade it is also up to 20 centimeters thicker.
It's also a mistake to assume that the current warm period is anything particuarly unusual. We've had warm periods comparable to the current warm period four other times in the last 1,500 years. Polar bears obviously made it through those times without vanishing as a species. Presumably they will do so again.
Thank you, Duscany, for restoring common sense to this forum. Unfortunately, too many bright people have bought into the cult of Al Gore and his tale of woe.
Post a Comment