Wednesday, October 31, 2007

How Evil is Natacha Seijas? Read this Article from Miami Today. By Geniusofdespair

The overt subversion of the charter review incensed Murray Greenberg, retired county attorney and task force member. "It shows what the commission really thinks about this group," he said.

Charter review's cave-in needn't be a permanent collapse - By Michael Lewis

Nothing was more predictable than the Miami-Dade County Charter Review Task Force's unwise cave-in to support election of a property appraiser.

The charter review, which should have been independent, was forced under the county commission's heavy thumb from day one. With the commission clawing for power against a newly strengthened mayor, it was clear that review of the county's constitution would become a convenient battleground.

In this case, commissioners forced the task force to recommend election of a job Mayor Carlos Alvarez had filled less than a month before, pulling the rug from under him. Election of a complex technical post now seems headed to voters. (hit read more).

Commissioners tried to ensure that last month, when Natacha Seijas quarterbacked a committee move to put the question on the ballot,bypassing the charter review and pressuring the task force — which had deadlocked — to get in line. It misguidedly did two weeks ago, 12-4.

The overt subversion of the charter review incensed Murray Greenberg, retired county attorney and task force member. "It shows what the commission really thinks about this group," he said.

But that disregard was evident from day one, when commissioners decided to control membership — naming 13 of the 21 — and study time, initially just three months and now six. Commissioners also kept a firm grip on what's to go to voters — nothing without commission OK.

Commissioner Katy Sorenson, recognizing the problems, had suggested that commissioners appoint from lists nominated by outsiders and let the task force work 18 months.

Instead, commissioners decided to name their own teams, the impact of which was evident when Miguel DeGrandy, Ms. Seijas's pick, defended her move to bypass the task force on electing an appraiser.

"We failed to move the ball," he told members. "The commission was within its rights to proceed" — though the task force hadn't yet decided anything; it just hadn't hastened to do Ms.Seijas's bidding.

Task force chairman Victor Diaz Jr. then announced the job ahead is to keep in closer touch with commissioners — no doubt to be sure the review yields predetermined results.

So much for an independent review. The word spineless comes to mind.

The task force had already caved in by rubberstamping commission structure, the county's greatest flaw. No commissioner is now elected countywide, and the charter team says none will be, so parochial views will linger.

Nothing, however, points up charter review failures more clearly than the buckling to commission pressure on electing an appraiser.

That job today has stringent county requirements: at least a bachelor's degree in real estate, business administration, public administration or a related field, plus 10 years of progressively responsible management in property appraisal.

The appraiser supervises 283 employees and is responsible for more than 955,000 personal property parcels in the state's largest assessment roll, with a taxable value of $245.3
billion.

Were the office to become elective, anyone who could muster the votes would be solely responsible for "planning and directing all tax-roll functions in conformance with Florida statutes and Department of Revenue rules and regulations, establishing and installing departmental policies, directing complex divisional property-appraisal operations, supervising fiscal activities and preparation of the annual departmental budget," and far more.

How many good vote-getters would also be skilled enough to handle this complex job?

On Sept. 26, Mayor Alvarez appointed Marcus Saiz de la Mora, who'd been acting in the job since Jan. 1 after receiving four major promotions in the appraisal department, which he had joined in 1984. He has a bachelor's in economics with a minor in finance from Florida International University, is a licensed real estate broker, a certified Florida appraiser and an accredited senior appraiser. He is also past president of the National Association of Hispanic Public Administrators.

Compare those qualifications with this county's average political candidate and quake in your boots.

We should elect posts that require general oversight and policymaking, appoint to jobs requiring expertise. We can't allow this job to become a popularity contest, where election is a recipe for disaster. But that's what our county commission has pushed the charter review task
force to recommend.

Why contemplate this perilous step?

Because an elected appraiser, no matter how weak, would not report to the mayor. The commission can slice up the mayor's power and hang the consequences.

Bad as all this sounds — you'd be justified to throw up your hands in disgust — it remains possible that the charter review could do the right thing on the property appraiser, election of county commissioners and more.

"I just feel like I'm wasting my time. I think we all are," Mr. Greenberg told task force members two weeks ago. "Maybe they should just disband us."

Or maybe task force members should decide, what the hell, let's do the right thing regardless. What do we have to lose? Forget the pressure, recommend what's best and send it forward. Let commissioners do their own hatchet jobs, rather than having the task force be the bad guys so commissioners can get their way but still look clean.

Force commissioners to act on good recommendations and something worthwhile might actually make it onto the ballot. That's better than a task force quietly caving in to the worst county commission instincts.

P.S. This is why we need Hometown Democracy. We need to stop the Evil Queen Natacha Seijas.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

Disgusting. Thanks for posting this. And for Miami Today for publishing the unvarnished truth.

Geniusofdespair said...

Michael Lewis is usually a cheerleader for the commission. Now even HE can't stand it anymore...they really have gone overboard.

Anonymous said...

michael lewis a cheerleader for the commission? what planet are you on?
He is being a little hrsh on the task force, those people are working hard and they are not beholdent to anyone. Ive sat through every meeting , so ive seen it first hand. If you dont agree with a decision, fine, but dont say its because you are being told what to do by the BCC. Murray Greenberg, whom you praise, is Pepe Diaz' appointee. You think he is carrying water for Pepe?

Ridiculous editorial...

Anonymous said...

sorry last poster, not a rediculous editorial, it's right on target.

Besides the fact that some of the task force members have strong armed issues one way or another according to what some commissioners want, the structure of the entire process is such that these recommendations are meaningless and a futile attempt at a snow job.

the commission is not bound to put any of them on the ballot. not all, not zero, not some, not some modified, even brand new items... the commission is totally in control and as far as any of this is concerned, it is a joke.

A sad attempt to make the citizenry think that they have some say, some input in the public meetings on the charter.

One of the recommendations is the commission salary issue.... we ALL know that the salary issue would pass IF it were coupled with mandatory term limits and a prohibition on outside employment...

however, do you think the commission will bunch those together on the ballot? don't give me that single issue BS.

How much do you want to bet me that if that gets on the ballot it's a stand alone item and the justification will be 'well the charter review task force recommended it'...

why is the voter turn out so darn low in this county with elected officials who are ripping us off in front of our eyes? we deserve what we vote for... we deserve this as a community!

Geniusofdespair said...

I said IS USUALLY ---

NOT IN THIS CASE OF COURSE. I have never seen him write so harshly about the commission before. EVER. What Planet are you from that you can't read.

Anonymous said...

I have seen at least 6 editorials with Michael Lewis ripping the commission a new one..On stadium, on budget, on the Perf arts center, on the airport. I dont think Ive ever seen Michael being a cheeleader for the BCC.

Im not a fool, i know that the charter review task force is a mandatory process and that the BCC will wipe their respective asses with the recommendations. However, the point above was that the CRTF was somehow following orders from the BCC, and i just happen to disagree with that. Take the chair, he was appointed by Bruno "dont call me eddy munster" barreiro and I dont think Victor's positions would ONCE fall in line with what Brunito wants.
I just felt that Michael trashed the CRTF, who are people spending quite a bit of time in this process. He trashes the volunteers, then complains (as he has int he past) that not enough people get involved in the civic process. Why would you if you are going to get trashed for doing what you feel is right...

Again, ive sat through all the meetings (at the library, SPC Center, Vizcaya, Historical Museum..locations have been rridiculous" and so I feel i have a better grasp on the discussions than indicated in the Lewis editorial.

I agree that the salary question would never pass on its own. I loved the debate as to how much they should be paid. I think we let the fine folks at Pharmed dictate what market value is for a Commissioner...I know what Id like to pay!

Geniusofdespair said...

thanks for your thoughful comment. (Isn't it better when you don't trash the blogger!)

Anonymous said...

It was never my intentions to trash you, I love this blog and agree with many of your opinions.
I just would never associate Michael Lewis as cheerleader of, well, anything except his advertisers.

Sorry if you felt insulted. No smiley Natasha face on my report card.

Btw, you'll enjoy this. I was reading the paper this morning . sharing some coffee with the mrs. and when i saw the Morin cartoon i said outloud "oh, genius of despair will love this one".
The wife looked at me funny and confessed she is worried as usually, when i mumble outloud while reading the paper, she usually knows what the hell im talking about.
So there genius, you have cracked my reaction to the news subconscious. I hope you are happy!

Geniusofdespair said...

thanks you made me laugh....not easy. yes, I loved the Morin Cartoon. I am sure Wackenhut was not amused....