Monday, July 09, 2007

Terror in the mortgage pools, by gimleteye

On Sunday, The Miami Herald reported on the latest auction of home foreclosures at the Miami-Dade County Clerk Office. One can easily imagine the same scenario being played out a thousand times across the nation on hot, lazy days where sleepiness is kept at bay by massive inputs of air conditioning and caffeine.

The Herald reports, “The amount of foreclosed real estate owned by Florida-based banks and thrifts has nearly tripled since the fall of last year, when foreclosure rates began their upward trek -- to $94 million as of March 31, from $34 million Sept. 30, according to the most recent Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. data. (These data do not include giants like Bank of America, which have large operations here but are based elsewhere.)

The Florida numbers are much worse than the national average, Miami banking analyst Ken Thomas said. Total real estate owned by banks and thrifts rose 37 percent in the first quarter, compared to 12 percent nationally, he said.

''It appears things will likely get worse before they get better,'' Thomas said.

At Thursday's auction, of roughly 70 properties offered for sale, investors bought only two. A handful were scratched. The rest were bought back by lawyers for various lenders.”

Nothing is happening in the most over-heated real estate markets around the nation, like South Florida’s.

A few weeks ago, The Palm Beach Post reported, “… in Delray Beach, developer Bill Morris is working hard to make sales at his Worthing Place, a 217-unit condo in the heart of Delray's festive downtown. Prices start at $350,000 per unit. Morris says he has plenty of buyer interest, thanks to several incentives. He's offering to pay two years of maintenance, plus a "fly and buy" program to bring qualified buyers in from out of town."

In South Florida real estate circles, a qualified buyer either has very fat wallet filled with dollars or a slim one filled with Euros.

Still, according to the Post, Mr. Morris' prospects are reluctant to sign on the dotted line. "Buyers are worried that if they buy today, the market will decline tomorrow. "No matter what we do, they say, 'Call me in November,'" Morris said.”

Judging from the lethargy of Miami real estate markets, nothing is happening in November aside from the silent click as billions in adjustable rate mortgages reset to higher rates.

Beneath the doldrums of summer, there is an inkling of worse around the corner. Condo and home buyers will not be flooding into housing markets any time soon or at anywhere near the volume to reduce the inventory of unsold residential property.

It is hard summer for US consumers, battered by gasoline prices and falling house values. A puckering feeling, all around.

The massive problems in subprime mortgages has to be unnerving for mortgage bankers at the root of a Decision Tree whose upper branches contain the exotic fruit of a poor homeowner’s misery.

The distressed, former homeowner is now in a rental, his or her credit rating excoriated, or staying with family or moved to a new town.

The banker has no idea what to do. Selling foreclosed properties at fire sale prices into weak and falling markets can't be helpful to the performance bonus.

But there are bigger dilemmas. It is one thing for mortgage inventories to swell on a balance sheet, another thing entirely to sell them off at a loss.

And, still, a bigger problem—the one you don’t read about in the newspapers—every dollar of mortgage value has spawned ten or twenty times the value (really, no one knows!) in derivative financial instruments that are used to leverage more financial assets on someone else’s balance sheet.

Typically, that someone else is a pension fund or provide required to book assets as “investment grade” and not the toxic waste that jumps out at you in a foreclosure sale in a fluorescent, over-lit conference room where everyone is fighting off yawns induced by taxing heat and uncertain prospects.

In 1998, a hedge fund LTCM needed to be hastily bailed out, to the tune of $3.65 billion by investment banks hastily convened to protect against a collapse in bond markets.

There is no final price tag, on the amount of equity Bear Stearns will have to commit, to get out of dodge in two funds sunk by collapsing subprime mortgage values. So far, the smaller of the two funds will require $3.2 billion. Is Bear Stearns, alone in its distress?

Last week, executives at the nation's leading investment banks claimed that the subprime mess is "contained". It sounded a lot, to me, like "Mission Accomplished".

The lenders at foreclosure auctions like the one the other day at the Office of the Clerk in Miami-Dade County don’t show their faces: that is what they hire lawyers for.

But I am wondering how long before the reality of sinking house values requires lenders to sell-off inventory at fire sale prices and what, then, happens to hundreds of billions of financial derivates that have been created from thin air.

Those derivatives are held by financial institutions that provide for the income of millions of ordinary Americans.

So as the fans circle lazily above a desultory and dejected crowd of mortgage lenders, their representatives, and bargain basement buyers in Miami, do the wizards of Wall Street, whose bonus pay packages set them far above quotidian concerns, do the members of the board of the Federal Reserve, or members of Congress, or does the White House have any idea how to avert a collapse, other than to deny inflation while stirring it higher, to whittle down the scale of liabilities from terror in the mortgage pools?

(Read more perspectives at eyeonmiami, the blog. For a coherent analysis of financial derivatives: read Paul Tustain, BullionVault, “Investment landfill, how professionals dump their toxic waste on you” )

15 comments:

Anonymous said...

Absolutely brilliant insight although as always, throws up more questions than it answers.

Anonymous said...

The, "call me in November," mentality baffles me. Rates remain historically well positioned. Credit policy folks have put the bottle down and are sobering up; hangover ever present. If you are a qualified buyer (they are out there) and not looking to "flip" the property; why not buy? Even with some additional value bleed I'm betting the correction will settle and the long term (7-12 years) will prove 6.00% to 8.00% appreciation on your investment. Things will improve, its not a question of if; only when. The herd mentality of waiting for the mainstream media to say its all better blows me away. If a recovery is published you're too late.

Anonymous said...

Why not buy? For one reason: millions of Americans had been persuaded to buy their home based on its potential as a speculative investment, and now they are burned.

Too many families, or individuals, stretched beyond the 30 percent yardstick for housing costs on the premise that they couldn't really afford more, but they would buy more anyhow because they would get a better "return" on their housing investment than stocks.

In 2005, in Miami-Dade County, an astounding 53 percent of households spent more than 30 percent of income on rentals. For homeowners, it was 60 percent.

It is shaping up as a perfect storm: people are pulling back from housing markets, inventories are skyrocketing, credit is tightening (and for good reasons, eyeonmiami shows), the market for securitized financial derivatives for housing is drying up, adjustable rate mortgages will be resetting in the Fall, and massively leveraged debt of unknown quality is sitting in hedge funds, investment banks, and pension funds required by law to hold "investment grade".

You tell me, what is going to happen! I'm just a simple blogger.

Anonymous said...

hns60, you must be a realtor. The "buy house now and get rich" mentality baffles me. The maintenance cost of a house makes it a bad investment. A house is a place to live, not a stock. It's only a good investment for the lender, mortgage broker, and realtor. Hurry, buy now- these people got hummers and YOU are the one paying

Anonymous said...

I agree, that poster is in real estate.
Why not buy?
Historically, housing appreciates closer to 3% long term,and that requires the owner to pay taxes and insurance,maintenance and upkeep.
Clearly a house is not an assset, but a liability.
That said, for those who must own, it is far wiser to buy a house at a lower price and higher interest rate,than it is to purchase at a higher price lower interest rate.
Fewer taxes, insurance with the former as well as a possibility that the mortgage might be refinanced at a lower rate at a later date.
Once you buy that overpriced house you can't go back and change the price.
Why buy? RENT!!!

Geniusofdespair said...

My parents owned a real estate firm. They bought properties on a shoestring to rent. As long as the rent covered their costs with money to spare-- they were in the plus -- they were pleased. That made Real Estate a good investment for them as the properties appreciated also.

The problem now is, the costs can't be covered by a rental because of taxes and insurance costs. Couple that with the Mortgage and upkeep, it makes the rental property a liability.

Cayo Dave said...

Why buy if interest rates are clearly headed higher while speculative and sub-prime borrowers are forced from the market? Seems like there will be less overall demand facing a mamouth amount of supply for a long time. I would suggest people not buy and instead build equity with savings and rent.
We certainly have not seen the bottom of the housing/mortgage market - wait for the PANIC.

Anonymous said...

You're right, Dave: no correction, without a PANIC. The question is, will there be a recession? The way things work, we'll be out of the recession before the government statistics are revised to announce that it happened. The US dollar is so weak, that a lot of the heart-beat in the economy is attributable to rising foreign demand for cheap US products and services. Are these inputs enough to fend off the recession already underway in the auto and housing industries? Don't know. Will we ever get honest answers from our govt? Don't know that, either!

lunkhead said...

My brother has a 3,200 sq. ft. home in Southwest Dade he had built about five years ago for about $225K. I actually think he is one of the lucky ones because he could recoup his investment and make a profit. But now his problem is the middle class squeeze. He works, his wife is a teacher and my parents also live there and contribute. Yet they are being squeezed by the homeowners and auto insurance rates, utilities, gas and food prices etc. Throw in the quality of life with all that traffic, that this blog clearly has covered, he's looking to get out. Can a middle class family afford a decent home near decent schools in South Florida anymore? I think the answer is clearly no.

Anonymous said...

All this housing crash talk is scaring me. Who can we blame? How about Scooter Libby?

Anonymous said...

Find where the greed is most compelling, when financial derivatives are created (and who is cheerleading) and you'll find plenty to blame.

Anonymous said...

Shaky stock market... on housing concerns... waiting for Bernancke ... time for the Chamber rah-rah pom poms in Florida.

Anonymous said...

S&P May Cut $12 Billion of Subprime Mortgage Bonds (Update1)
By Mark Pittman


"For Sale" and "Open House" signs
July 10 (Bloomberg) -- Standard & Poor's said it may cut credit ratings on $12 billion in bonds backed by subprime mortgages because losses will rise beyond its previous expectations.

Ratings of 612 classes of residential mortgage-backed securities were placed on CreditWatch with negative implications, New York-based S&P said today in an e-mailed statement. The bonds represent 2.1 percent of the $565.3 billion of similar bonds rated by S&P during 2006.

``We expect that the U.S. housing market, especially the subprime sector, will continue to decline before it improves, and home prices will continue to come under stress,'' S&P said. ``Weakness in the property markets continues to exacerbate losses, with little prospect for improvement in the near term.''

Investors have criticized S&P, Moody's Investors Service and Fitch Ratings because their ratings on bonds backed by mortgages to people with poor or limited credit don't reflect the fastest default rate in a decade. Prices of some bonds backed by subprime mortgages have declined by more than 50 cents on the dollar in the past few months while their credit ratings haven't changed.

``We do not foresee the poor performance abating,'' S&P said. ``Loss rates, which are being fueled by shifting patterns in loss behavior and further evidence of lower underwriting standards and misrepresentations in the mortgage market, remain in excess of historical precedents and our initial assumptions.''

S&P said it also plans to change the methods it uses to rate existing and new mortgage bonds to reflect the increased likelihood of mortgage defaults and losses.

S&P spokesman Chris Atkins declined comment prior to the teleconference.

(S&P will host a conference call at 10 a.m. New York time. To listen, dial +1-888-324-0379 in the U.S. or +1-210-234-6980 internationally. Conference ID#: 1197033, passcode: SANDP)

To contact the reporter on this story: Mark Pittman in New York at mpittman@bloomberg.net .

Last Updated: July 10, 2007 09:33 EDT

Anonymous said...

So the question is: how much leveraged debt--turned assets--was piled onto that $12 billion, in the form of CDO's or credit default swaps? Who is going to have to sell, and how quickly, because the stuff is now junk and no longer investment grade?

Maybe one of our readers can tell us...

Anonymous said...

Yes, a middle class family can afford a good life-style. Sell the house -- and rent.

You can rent any house in America right now for half of the monthly cost to buy and own a comparable house. Add mortgage principal, interest, insurance, taxes and maintenance together. (A generalization - with a few exceptions probably -- but true 90% of the time.)

Double your life-style - rent. You can move close in to the area that makes you happiest.

Orlando, Fla