Monday, June 25, 2007

Miami Politics, America's Perp Carnival by gimleteye

Come corrupt us, seems to be the shingle hanging out in front of every politician’s office in Miami, Florida. I’m not making this up.

With housing markets collapsing like castles made of sand, the news of the day is a throwback to the 1950’s or some other era brazen era gilded by greed.

It’s nauseating, what Miami politicians have done in recent years, in the name of protecting public health and welfare.

Thievery of the public trust is the order of the day. How else to interpret Sunday’s feature story and today's second part in the Miami Herald: prominent African American leaders (Kendrick Meek, Carrie Meek, Dorin Rolle) aided and abetted a scam artist to once again pilfer the public trust in Miami Dade County? Developer reaped millions for biotech park never built.

“Under the watch of local government, a Boston developer reaped millions in poverty money for a promised biotech park but never delivered a single building—leaving only a desolate swath of land in one of Miami-Dade’s most neglected neighborhoods.” That's just the most recent chapter.

There was Barbara Jordan in 2006 trying to shoe-horn her own county “affordable” housing ordinance, a fig leaf for big developers like Lennar to plow more condominiums into farmland. There were African American county commissioners looking the other way as the County Housing Agency itself was plundered by low level political hacks aspiring to be big lobbyists, reported by the Herald in its Pulitzer Prize winning "House of Lies."

The Miami Herald deserves kudos, but damn if the city’s only daily newspaper didn't come up in second place in last week's other story of public corruption: the hijacking of an entire city department charged with capital improvements—turning a public department into a private contracting firm called, surprise, The Firm.

These scandals took flight at the apogee of the building boom in 2005, like a slingshot stretched and aimed at every politician with a nose for private gain. Like then county chairman Joe Martinez taking free work on his West Dade home from a contractor associated with the leadership of the Latin Builders Association, then seeking changes to the Urban Development Boundary?

Eagerly they jumped on whatever train was leaving whatever station, without concern for ethics or the law, and in the narcoleptic wake of Jeb Bush’s 'let’s streamline development for developers' school of government.

Looking back at the building boom and the behavior of public officials, who needed crack when simply raising your hand in an affirmative vote for the builders' lobby offered such delectable treats to compliant city and county commissioners?

A few weeks ago I wrote, “The recent, past building boom contained the seeds of the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on South Florida taxpayers. The stories are just beginning to bloom.”

Little did I know.

But The Firm headline leads to another clammy question: how did a monthly news magazine get a leg up on the city’s esteemed daily newspaper?

Miami Monthly appears to have scooped The Miami Herald in its in-depth report, “Robbing the City Blind: Welcome to The Firm. Where city employees work on their secret clients on city time, with city equipment, and on the city’s dime.”


The Herald did report the story on Saturday, and both news sources may have held off breaking the news until the State Attorney’s Office made its case.

“They called it ‘The Firm’—a consulting business Miami city government employees were running from their desks at the Riverside Center administrative building. On Thursday, police and prosecutors called it racketeering and organized fraud,” the Herald reports.

But Miami Monthly appears to have had the details, and the sources, to the heart of the story.

“In late December 2005, HDR consultants started piecing together clues that something was seriously amiss. One consultant told another in an email: ‘I have seen meetings between firm members to discuss and produce plans for projects that have no relation to any CIP (Capital Improvement Plan) project. I have also seen firm members holding meetings in their cubicles… with open plans that have nothing to do with any CIP project… These occurrences are well known by all CIP personnel in the 8th floor.’”

The Miami Herald reported, “We are arresting virtually an entire arm of city government,” Miami-Dade State Attorney Katherine Fernandez Rundle said at a news conference in the lobby of the city administrative building.”

But Miami Monthly gives us the detail: an initial January 2006 investigation dead-ended, allowing a full nine months for those charged to go on their merry way.

Beyond the question, was the Herald asleep?, how little regard did government employees have for law enforcement, that they felt continued their merry way for nine solid months until—as Miami Monthly reports, “late in 2006 a handwritten anonymous letter detailing The Firm’s activities arrived at the city manager’s office”?

Finally, City of Miami Human Resources Directior Rosalie Mark recommended a company to perform an in-depth investigation: RJD Unlimited, Inc.

Now with evidence in hand, the Miami Police Departments Internal Affairs division “took immediate action.”

“The massive investigation identified more than a dozen employees—some earning over $100,000 a year—surreptitiously managing 70 private projects ranging from additions and remodeling of private homes to multi-million dollar shopping centers—all during city business hours.”

“This is just the tip of the iceberg,” said one source, predicting that those brought in for questioning would freely rat out their cohorts in hopes of leniency.”

This story not only has legs. It has eighteen wheels.

Well, yes. Damn it: let’s have the names of the private individuals who were having work done by a city department for their construction projects.

By all means, let’s see if any of those individuals turn up as campaign contributors or consultants to contributors of political campaigns in the city of Miami?

I have questions: plenty of them.

Under what conditions of malfeasance does an ENTIRE city department go to the dark side?

I would say: under conditions of malfeasance in which corruption is not only tolerated but under conditions where ethical behavior is regarded as a career-killer.

The Herald reports, “City Commissioner Joe Sanchez said he was pleased the city initiated the investigation, though he said City Hall faces a difficult task in keeping the public’s trust. ‘There’s a perception that we’re all crooks,’ Sanchez said, ‘It’s absolutely wrong.’”

Joe, you’re wrong.

Let me tell you why city employees thought they could get away with turning over a department of government to private interests: it is because every single day government employees watch elected officials turn over their zoning and permitting authority to private interests.

Commissioner Sanchez, are you listening? Commissioner Pepe Diaz, are you listening?

What effect do you imagine it has when a powerful developer, Sergio Pino, takes a county commissioner on a private jet trip to the Caribbean during which time “no county business is discussed”?

And what effect does it have on county employees, who watch Natacha Seijas enforce hegemony over Hialeah politics by ruthlessly persecuting opponents and even violating their civil rights with the assistance of local police?

What effect does it have on morale of county employees when the Miami Dade Ethics Commission simply smiles and says, tsk, tsk.

How else do you think Miami citizens view a decision like the recent one to approve Jorge Perez’ zoning change at Mercy Hospital, to build condominiums for the ultra-wealthy in the midst of a housing market crash—in the face of universal civic disapproval?

What’s good for the goose, is good for the gander.

So this leads to other questions: is it possible that employees at the city of Miami have migrated knowledge to or from the culture of corruption at Miami Dade County?

It is naïve to think there is no cross-pollination between the employees at the city of Miami and Miami Dade County: especially when key political consultants and big law firms lobby at both places.

So what does it say, that the Miami Herald could not uncover this major story before a monthly magazine?

Is it possible that good people in government are not talking to Herald reporters about corruption that they know to exist and talking to Miami Monthly, instead?

What is the real story behind the projections of financial stability by performing arts organizations that plunged the PAC into deficit?

How is it possible that a monthly magazine organized an investigative piece, did all the work that a monthly magazine does, and with all the lead-time delay, still did a better job than the Miami Herald on this important story?

A while ago, we praised the Herald for the “House of Lies” series and its Pulitzer. But we also noted, in passing, that it is easier to write about fraud done to poor and homeless people than to taxpayers by an economic elite that feels omnipotent in Miami and cultivates strong ties to the city’s only daily newspaper.

Mayor Manny Diaz told a lobby packed with reporters and city employees that his administration would continue to try to root out what he called the “bad apples.”

Balance that, against what fake biotech developer Stackhouse, told the Miami Herald in today’s paper “… Carrie Meek had nothing to do with her son's requests for federal dollars. It's totally unrelated,'' he said. ``Trust me.''

All we can say is—it is a very sad day for the City of Miami and every politician that can lay claim to protecting the public interest.

“In all, Stackhouse companies received commitments for nearly $30 million in public money from county leaders since he began to push the biotech park in 2003. That includes $23 million the County Commission approved to purchase a parking garage that the developer says will be built in the next two years -- even though the garage is already months behind schedule and there is no money to put up buildings to go with it.

''This little project that couldn't has turned doubters into believers,'' Commissioner Rolle said after the vote.”

And if you believe that, we have some wetlands to sell you to subdivide and live on the balance for your retirement. I'm still waiting for the Miami Herald to level its full wrath at the Perp Carnival of Miami Politics.

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

All this makes me want to move away so far from Miami. it's rediculous here.

Anonymous said...

Quote: "There was Barbara Jordan in 2006 trying to shoe-horn her own county “affordable” housing ordinance, a fig leaf for big developers like Lennar to plow more condominiums into farmland."

I think that this is deeply unfair to Commissioner Jordan, who has a long record of supporting affordable housing before such efforts became politically en vogue.

Given the reaction of the development community to her proposal (unfailingly negative), the program can also hardly be characterized as a give away to developers.

Anonymous said...

The fact is that Commissioner Jordan spent nearly a whole year in consultation, not with affordable housing advocates, but with Lennar and lobbyists for the S. Fl Builders-- drafting her ordinance.

The matter coincided with a struggle by Lennar and lobbyists to bring forward a plan to build a community of 18,000 people in Florida City, where her brother is Mayor. Her sister lobbied for the project.

The Jordan ordinance did nothing for people who really needed affordable housing. What it did, in the first draft, was MANDATE that a percentage of homes in platted subdivisions should be "affordable", according to income level standards that scarcely touch her constituent's needs.

At about the same time that the applications to move the Urban Development Boundary (which Jordan supported) fell apart, suddenly the Jordan ordinance became VOLUNTARY on the part of the builders.

The exact timing of these changes, in relation to points of urgent interest by the builders' lobby, was never reported and will never be known, because community affordable housing advocates (as opposed to hired guns from the County Housing Agency, since furloughed out we'd guess) were EXCLUDED from Commissioner Jordan's deal making.

Anonymous said...

Are things getting worst in Miami? Or is this business as usual that do to technology, the scandalous news concerning our cities corruption and failures just receive more press, blogger and e-mail attention?

Geniusofdespair said...

Harry,There is no place to hide anymore.
Don't leave, Anon 1, stay here and make it better.

Barbara Jordan should have recused herself from voting on the Florida City Annex which her brother brought before the county commission. For her to keep calling him "Mr. Mayor" when it was her brother she was speaking to -- made me want to puke it was so phony. I am doing a lot of puking this week.

Anonymous said...

Yes, things are getting worse in Miami: if you look at the recent scandals, as eyeonmiami has done, they all connect through the building boom that ended in 2005, although the visible signs in downtown--the big condo projects--are just now nearing completion.

In other words, during the heyday of the boom--when the champagne was flowing at condo pre-sale parties--alot of bad stuff started that is only now being brought to light of day.

Did we know bad things were happening? Of course we did: we, being citizens watching what was happening to our communities.

But the builders lobby was unstoppable, then. Part of the reason we blog, now, is to encourage more readers to become involved in stopping the builders lobby before it does MORE harm to Miami and Miami-Dade County.

I think things in Miami will get a lot worse because people are going to start hurting more, as the prices for condos and houses continue to fall. It will bring a different kind of pain to Miami: falling tax revenues, budget cuts, at just the time we need to be investing in our infrastructure, that can only be paid for by taxes (one way or another).

With prudent fiscal leadership, the worst could be avoided. But that's not what we have in Miami, is it?

Anonymous said...

I do not doubt that the builders' willingness to support the affordable housing ordinance may have faded with the need for Jordan's support on other applications. That is business after all.

The Commissioner surely counted votes and knew she needed to compromise to get anything enacted. Again, not surprising or nefarious. It is called politics.

As to the value of the program, no one was pretending that the units were designed to serve very low to low income people.

You may believe that the private sector has an obligation to build low income housing. I agree with you that the County has clearly done a miserable job of it.

You must also be able to imagine the neighborhood reaction a developer would get to a project that included such low income units. I can already smell the torches.

Who among us wants to volunteer to live next to the "Section 8" part of a development?

Most people are supportive of affordable housing, unless, of course, that housing is in their neighborhood.

I also think we have to be realistic and understand that this program would never have solved the affordable housing problem, regardless of whether the housing advocates got what they wanted.

There are simply not enough new homes permitted every year to support the need for affordable units within new market rate developments.

Those units instead need to be built by people who want to create low income or mixed communities, not your "production" homebuilders. There are very good developers who do this kind of thing (Pinnacle, for example). The problem has become that the County and the State have not made it more attractive to do this kind of development. Take a look at what happened to the state trust fund.

The affordable units (and I'm talking low income) should also be located in areas where people have access to good public transit, etc. That means urban development in the eastern core of the County. Putting affordable units in West Kendall, assuming you could get them approved, would do little to help.

Anonymous said...

It is the pits here.

I think with a savory stew comprised of no investigative news reporting, the fearless arrogance of the builders, mixed with the "me, my, mine" world of our politicians there should be no surprise that there is gut-rot in the public pot that is being served up these days.

Across the board it doesn't seem to matter what part of town you come from, it is all the same. I used to think that no one sat in back rooms plotting up things, I am not too sure anymore. It looks like the stars would really have to be in alignment for all the coincidences to come into being without a master plan.

Anonymous said...

Thanks so much for recognizing us for the news scoop on the city of Miami corruption story, by Miami Monthly magazine.
Those who haven't seen it can go to www.miamimonthlymagazine.com
We worked hard on this one, and appreciate your comments.
Thanks for all your good work on this blog. It is intelligent and educational and worthwhile.
Elena V. Carpenter, Publisher
Miami Monthly

Anonymous said...

Miami Monthly did a great job reporting on the Miami Capital Improvements Dept scam.

Where was Miami Monthly when Related was trying to rezone land surrounded by a single family neighborhood? Has Miami Monthly reported the six lawsuits in opposition?

Anonymous said...

Miami Monthly began reporting on that issue about 2 years ago, when the president of Bay Heights Assoc. went to Grove First to ask for support in the opposition of the project. It has continued ever since. The reporter that has been on that, is still on it, and I assume that will be in our next issue - do remember that we are a monthly.

Anonymous said...

I heard Miami Monthly never reported the six lawsuits filed against the Related/Mercy rezoning scam. Didn't the owner of Miami Monthly lobby and advise Related on how to get the rezoning? For money? Conflict of interest anyone?