11:54 PM. Fox News, a news network? Come on. Karl Rove, who directed billions of shady money for Republican candidates is ALONE and there he is, commandeering the stage at Fox News, objecting to the networks calling the Obama victory in Ohio based on numbers crunching. I mean, look: does Karl Rove have the keys to the front door at Fox? Does he have a direct line into the Secretary State of Ohio, and the computer codes used in electronic balloting. Can't believe what I'm watching! The Fox News anchors have ceded the platform to Blossom Turd (W.'s nickname for Rove.) There is a total disconnect here: Roger Ailes, do you know how embarrassing this moment is for Fox News???? At least it is clear who runs Fox.
8 comments:
Rove is a paid political analyst for Fox. Why would you be surprised that he is being featured in election night coverage? Would you rather see another Fox analyst? Palin? Coulter? Malkin?
actually, I'd like to see all of their smug faces on air right now, along with Hannity and Limbaugh and Levin. If you listened to them for the last week or so, it was the same ridiculous talking points over and over -- all the polls were skewed and Romney was going to win in a landslide. I'll stick with the five thirty eight blog, thanks.
And Chris Matthews, Al Sharpton. And Rachel Maddow are fact-based independent journalists. I can't believe anyone would take the circus clown, Sharpton, seriously in anything, never mind political reporting. Why not hire Farrakan as an objective reporter?
Hannity and Levin both said that this race would be razor close. They were correct. I don't listen to Limbaugh so I don't know what he said.
But Sharpton was right, "It is not about Obama, It is about your Moma."
Well, it's not your father's country any more. It belongs to the new generation. I strongly oppose it but, what are you going to do.? Live on, fight each day, die.
Anon above, I beg to differ. I listened to Hannity and Rush and Levin and they all predicted a big win for Romney. For Hannity it was based on Rasmussen and Dick Morris' incorrect skewing of the polls to reflect what they thought the turnout would be (they assumed 2004 totals and demographics). For Rush it was the incorrect assumption (actually he stated it as a fact) that you can't win the electiuon by winning with women and not carrying at least 50% of the male vote (memo to Rush, it is not 1950 any more). His comments yesterday and today, which mirrored O'Reilly, was prety much to write off all Obama supporters as people who want government handouts -- a myopic view at best. And Rove was funnier. Instead of addressing why he was wrong in his projections pre-election (he matched Dick Morris), he spent his time on air explaining how the president got 7 million or so votes less this time than he did in 2008 - as if that matters somehow. The Republican Party needs to face facts. The extreme conservative platform cannot win a national election. The majority of the electorate is centrist, falling slightly right or left of center and they really want who the believe will be more moderate and willing to compromise. Romney did his best to put on his moderate clothes, but he had to go way too far right just to win the nomination and he couldn't get back to the center in enough people's minds in time for the election. Maybe if he had 3 more months...
Turd blossom, not blossom turd. Its a flower that blooms from a cow patty.
I think cow patty is a better nickname.
Post a Comment