There are those, of course, who disagree that scientists have any role in public advocacy. In the U.S., deniers have not only had the media platform (ie. Fox News, Rush) to launch their jihads against environmental rules and regulations, they also have pinned down American politics by commandeering campaign finance law. In the battle for the heart and soul of America-- the scientists and James Hansen are not winning.
In Florida, if drought hasn't helped us pay attention, maybe extreme cold will. A peer reviewed science journal just published, "Severe 2010 Cold-Water Event Caused Unprecendented Mortality to Corals of the Florida Reef Tract and Reversed Previous Survivorship Patterns."
Background
Coral reefs are facing increasing pressure from natural and anthropogenic stressors that have already caused significant worldwide declines. In January 2010, coral reefs of Florida, United States, were impacted by an extreme cold-water anomaly that exposed corals to temperatures well below their reported thresholds (16°C), causing rapid coral mortality unprecedented in spatial extent and severity.
Conclusions/Significance
The cold-water anomaly of January 2010 caused the worst coral mortality on record for the Florida Reef Tract, highlighting the potential catastrophic impacts that unusual but extreme climatic events can have on the persistence of coral reefs. Moreover, habitats and species most severely affected were those found in high-coral cover, inshore, shallow reef habitats previously considered the “oases” of the region, having escaped declining patterns observed for more offshore habitats. Thus, the 2010 cold-water anomaly not only caused widespread coral mortality but also reversed prior resistance and resilience patterns that will take decades to recover.
This is one --and only one-- of the indicators of extreme weather attributable to climate change. Collectively, as a society, we haven't begun to appreciate what it means to have lifted the human species to unparalleled achievements in the past 2000 years and yet be on the verge of threatening our place in tens of millions of years of evolution.
Back in the Clinton era, Secretary of Interior Bruce Babbitt said that we need to "walk more lightly on the earth." His words sound quaint in relation to the backlash of the past decade against science and reason, as our political climate is wracked by fear and its flames stoked by extremists.
There is an imperative to shift government policies in common sense ways. And there have been changes but mostly in line with the profit motive of large corporations. We've had the corn ethanol fiasco. The wind power fiasco. And the failure to create a new jobs economy around distributed power generation at the consumer level. We've even had the fiasco in Miami-Dade County of the builders objecting to any land use maps that could drive public investment in infrastructure away from flood prone areas. In other words, we seem to be inviting "the deluge".
As Mitt Romney reminded his audience the other day, "corporations are people!" I doubt James Hansen's arrest will give the nation's top corporate executives a second thought. But Hansen, like EOM, is laying down his markers. We have one chance to live on this planet. It is a magnificent opportunity, and if you don't step in and stand up for conserving what we have, for future generations, well; a pox on your house, or, corporate headquarters.
8 comments:
Well if the cold weather doesn't finish the corals off - the Port expansion projects in Florida will. Port of Miami and Port Everglades both have plans to blast coral reefs off shore to make way for Panamax supercharged ships.
The global temperature has increased 0.75 degrees in the last century. That is a fact and there's no evidence to suggest any other cause than the ebb and flow of our planetary cycle, much less an anthropogenic cause. Can you see the Mastadons all running around beating each other up for causing the global cooling that led to the last ice age? How cute!
All the rest is BS, and is used to drive a progressive political agenda.
Did you read yesterday that president Obama's pet solar energy company folded? Not economically viable on a commercial scale, but let's not allow facts to obscure our desired worldview.
Readers, David comes out of the woodwork every time we write about:
Global Warming
FPL
Nuclear
I would call him a blog troll because of this, a blog troll in the sense that he only visits our site when a key word is written.
If David wants to argue with the 97 percent of climatologists who agree that it is happening and it is manmade, he has that right.
But we cannot be sidetracked by pseudo-science. We as a country and a planet need to move forward with policies to curb greenhouse production. Time is running out. Greenland is melting. Each disaster is going to be a little worse, each year.
The political counter winds fueled by the Koch brothers and the petroleum industry are dissipating, and we will soon get on with the hard work of getting off oil and limiting the damage to nature and humankind.
Sources:
http://articles.cnn.com/2009-01-19/world/eco.globalwarmingsurvey_1_global-warming-climate-science-human-activity?_s=PM:WORLD
http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/08/31/documenting-a-collapsing-ice-shelf/
http://www.ipcc.ch/
Omg! As it happens Greenland is disintegrating today.
I don't know who David is, but the selective use of facts to jump to the conclusion that "all the rest is BS to drive a progressive political agenda" is exactly the kind of right-wing extremism and denial of science noted in the post. David probably also thinks that the United Nations is a conspiracy hatched in the mind of Putin and aliens walk among us.
David can't be changed. He might even be paid to sow the seeds of idiocy, but some readers might. Try this:
https://www.ipcc.unibe.ch/publications/wg1-ar4/faq/wg1_faq-6.2.html
David,
I thought FP&L has always portrayed itself as a "green", "environmentally-sensitive" energy company. If you're one of their paid blog trolls, than the rumors must be true that FP&L ultimately will build two "clean coal" fossil plants at Turkey Point, rather than the two planned nuclear units that FP&L customers are already paying for. Any comment?
The EPA just released its scientific integrity policy. HOpng for ogod things sin ce Obama has pledged we follow "science not ideolog" (2009 when he okayed stem cell research). The Society of Environmental Journalists comments say that “the policy leaves political appointees with dominant authority for message control,” and contains ambiguous wording that “may mean scientists must get permission before talking to a reporter,” and that reporters might not be allowed to talk to the specific scientist they ask to interview.” And I guess they definitely can't take part in protests ...
Post a Comment