I'm not opposed to gun ownership but the NRA is a fetish organization. The NRA has imposed its obsession on American politics for as long as I can remember. Its agenda is absolutist like the pro-life movement. The NRA will not be satisfied until every American is welded to its certainty.
Like most obsessions, there is a perversity at the core of the NRA agenda. It insists, gun ownership is about freedom and liberty, but its compulsive orthodoxy is not about freedom, it is about control.
Here is the latest example from the recent session (the worst in modern history) of the Florida legislature and Representative Don Gaetz: an alert from the Florida League of Cities about a new law of state pre-emption of local rules about guns: that "under HB 45, an elected city official passing or a city employee enforcing an ordinance prohibiting guns in parks, discharging guns within city limits, or otherwise restricting guns could be personally liable and the government could also be liable." Yes, you read that right.
If every American owned a gun, and fired their guns at once at will on the street or in parks, the NRA would still find ways to herd American politics along their agenda of control and orthodoxy. A new enemy would be invented, if it didn't already exist. A new threat is always available without illumination how the NRA itself has wrapped up American culture and politics in its perverse form of stagecraft.
4 comments:
We have a home rule charter. Does this apply to Miami-Dade county?
"The Leon County Commission voted to repeal several county laws involving hunting and guns, and said they felt strong-armed by the state and Gov. Rick Scott to do so.
Tallahassee Democrat June 15, 2011
The law simply says that the state government is the only entity that can enact gun control laws and city ordinances on the topic are not allowed. A city official can enforce any state statute, just not an illegal ordinance.
What's wrong with that? Why should I have to deal with a new set of gun control laws each time I travel through a different municipality? And why should someone who resides in one city fall under a different set of gun laws than a resident of another city?
I love the new law. Thank you Florida Legislature and Rick Scott for enacting and signing it.
In a liberal's world, it's okay to be an absolutist on the 1st Amendment, but not the 2nd Amendment. Why the hypocrisy?
Post a Comment