Wednesday, July 20, 2011

The Gates Foundation takes on the modern toilet ... by gimleteye

Kudos to the Gates Foundation for tackling (with its billions) an environmental problem (really, how long has it taken?): to develop technology to deal with human waste at its source-- where we pee and poo. The Gates Foundation comes to the problem of the toilet through its work in the undeveloped world, where 2.5 billion people lack modern sanitation. But South Florida, not precisely described as the developed world, is another example: here billions of gallons of fresh water are wasted per day, through the process of getting rid of our waste.

It would be a magnificent contribution to civilization if the Gates Foundation-- through grants to scientists and engineers-- came up with a water-efficient way to sanitize and to re-use human waste. (In fact, we've known how to do this for aeons, we just haven't fit either tradition or practices or existing technologies into the modern sewerage systems.)

But then the Gates Foundation would have to tackle another problem: local governments, lobbyists, and public officials who profit mightily from the current system, involving billions in infrastructure, contracts, and fees. Why, for example, aren't water-less toilets mandated in public facilities in Florida? That could happen, right now. (Oh, the GOP is against government regulations to protect the environment. Isn't "command and control", though, what we teach our children when they are potty-trained?)

As the climate becomes hotter, year by year, water is emerging as a threatened commodity. In the future, Florida may not be able to afford flushing its fresh water away. A revolution in waste disposal will also protect natural resources like the Everglades; the manifestation of our failure to match action to words.

So thank you, Gates Foundation. But be prepared to spend money influencing the builders, the developers, the lobbyists and local elected officials who will not surrender their shitty ways without a very dirty fight. Now prove me wrong, by a new regulations in Miami-Dade mandating waterless toilets. (click 'read more', for the CNN report)




The modern flush toilet hasn't changed much since the 1700s, when it was invented.
Gates Foundation funds "toilet reinvention" project
Aim is to encourage sanitation in places without sewer systems
New toilets may generate electricity, recycle water from human waste
RELATED TOPICS
Energy Technology
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

(CNN) -- The toilet is broken -- and not because it won't flush.
This unsightly piece of technology, which everyone uses but no one seems to think much about, is in desperate need of an overhaul, according to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which launched a challenge to "reinvent the toilet."
The foundation announced $41.5 million worth of grants on Tuesday aimed at getting someone to reengineer the flushing porcelain pot, which has been in use since the 1700s.
"No innovation in the past 200 years has done more to save lives and improve health than the sanitation revolution triggered by invention of the toilet," Sylvia Mathews Burwell, president of the foundation's global development program, said in a statement. "But it did not go far enough. It only reached one-third of the world. What we need are new approaches. New ideas. In short, we need to reinvent the toilet."
So what exactly is wrong with the current commode?
It's too expensive for people in the developing world; it requires water and a sewer-system hook-up, which aren't always available; and it does nothing to actually treat human waste, said Frank Rijsberman, the foundation's director of water sanitation and hygiene.
"We like the toilet. It was invented in 1775, saved millions of lives," he said. "At the same time, it didn't reach two-thirds of the world's population."
So it's high time for an update, he said.
About 2.5 billion people don't have access to toilets as we've currently imagined them, and this lack of toilet access encourages the spread of diarrheal diseases, which are blamed for the deaths of 1.5 million children each year, according to the World Health Organization.
"We want to look at waste as a resource and recycle it," Rijsberman said. "We think we can recycle the energy, the minerals and also the water. We want to reinvent the toilet that is cheap, that doesn't cost more than a few pennies, that poor people want to use and that will recycle minerals, energy and water."
The Gates Foundation has given out eight grants (here's the list as a PDF) to universities that are trying to dream up a toilet 2.0.
Here are a few of the most striking ideas from those grantees:
• Andrew Cotton, from Loughborough University in the UK, is making a toilet that will "recover water and salt from feces and urine."
• Georgios Stefanidis, from Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands, is working on a toilet that will generate electricity from waste, which will be "gasified into plasma" using microwaves. That gas can be used to generate electricity, according to the proposal.
• Yu-Ling Chen, from the University of Toronto, is trying to make a toilet that will "sanitize feces within 24 hours" so human waste doesn't transmit disease through a community. Chen plans to use a process of dehydration, filtration and smoldering to render the waste harmless.
• Michael Hoffmann, from the California Institute of Technology, plans to develop a solar-powered toilet. Solar cells generate enough power to process waste and turn it into fuel for electricity.
The Gates Foundation warns that none of these efforts constitutes a "silver bullet" that would solve the world's sanitation problems and says new toilet designs must be pursued in tandem with better wastewater treatment and sanitation systems.
Some efforts to remake the toilet have gone down the tubes.
"There have been a lot of toilet projects out there and a lot of failures," Marla Smith-Nilson, executive director of Water 1st International, told The Seattle Times.
But the Gates Foundation remains hopeful that "radical innovation" can help.
The universities that received funding are expected to have working prototypes within a year, and the foundation expects some of the projects to be ready for rollout in three or four years, Rijsberman said.
Although these redesigned toilets are targeted at third-world countries, some of these ideas would be helpful in United States and Europe, too, Rijsberman said, especially in addressing water shortages.
"How much sense does it make to clean up water to drinking water standards and then flush it down with sewage in an expensive pipe system?" he said. "We think modern science and technology can produce something that is more like the cell phone of sanitation."

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

This is a fantastic endeavor.

You do have a point, all the undue influence is going to make it tough to change the infrastructure.

Ever notice that there is a lot of undue influence when it comes to making changes in policy that effects the environment? However, when it comes to making changes to making say our government more efficient there are "advocates" like labor unions. Or how about needed changes for future recipients of the Social Security system, the AARP is fighting it tooth and nail as an "advocate" for Grandma today.

Here is my biggest gripe when it comes to "advocates" Why up until now, did the Miami Metro Mover stop about 3/4 miles from the MIA airport?

Have you seen the number of yellow taxis at the airport, many with bumper stickers from previous local political campaigns?

If the train was built to take tourist and locals alike directly to MIA without the aide of a taxi driver, think of how many carbons could have been saved and traded on a phony market exchange by an "advocate" like Goldman Sacs & Al Gore?

Mensa said...

See yellow, let it mellow, see brown, flush it down.

For Florida where the politicians must be paid large bribes to do anything, the public by sticking to the above beautiful poem will save a tremendous amount of water.

Sparrow said...

Great posting Gimleteye! But They'll probably target the developing world due to Gates health priorities. Anyway, few in the US will give up anything, but same people love to tell the developing world not to do as we do.

Anonymous said...

start in the Keys. it's a great initiative that could provide great dividends in the future. it's worth the time for EOM to keep after it.