The University of Florida's Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is virtually an extension service of the sugar industry and has been for decades. Try to find an IFAS scientist who will speak out against Big Sugar's pollution of the Everglades. You won't be able to find one. Not one. Alfie Fanjul is a trustee of the University of Miami. The Fanjuls are also closely tied to Florida International University, through FIU's Applied Research Center and taxpayer funded research on ethanol production from sugar waste.
While university scientists are often hired by environmental plaintiffs in litigation brought against government agencies or private industry, non-profit groups like Friends of the Everglades or Sierra Club (in the interest of disclosure, I have been involved in litigation management for both non-profits) usually are forced to go out-of-state to hire expert witnesses. Finding a research scientist who will cross the interests and influence of billionaire contributors to university programs is rare as hen's teeth. The pressure is not subtle, either. (The best example of throttling scientists involved in Everglades research in Florida's universities is the 2003 case related to Dr. Larry Brand, at the University of Miami, reported by Miami New Times.)
On this corruption of Florida's universities by the Kochs, Howard Troxler wrote an appropriately acerbic editorial recently in the St. Pete Times: click, read more for his take on the matter of prostituting academia through the monied influence of polluters.
The new and improved FSU course catalog, brought to you by Charles G. Koch
By Howard Troxler, May 12, 2011
FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY "Pecunia veritas est"*
2011 COURSE CATALOG
ECON 201: FREE MARKET THEORY. Sponsored and faculty approved by: Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation. Evils of government regulation; wisdom of tax cuts for the rich; rehabilitation of trickle-down theory. 3 credit hours.
POLI SCI 400: ADVANCED SOROS. Sponsored and faculty approved by: Soros Fund Management. Topics include advancement of international socialist conspiracy; legalization of drugs. 3 credit hours.
GEOLOGY 145: OIL SPILLS REVISITED. Sponsored and faculty approved by:
British Petroleum. Beneficial effects of crude-oil application to wildlife,
ocean bottoms; positive effects on financial market speculation. 3 credit
hours; 1 lab hour observing ducks being cleaned by free market forces.
MATH 314: CONSERVATIVE CALCULUS. Sponsored and faculty approved by: TBA (bidding still in progress). Defense of the new "math-er" movement.
Refutation of prevailing liberal propaganda regarding value of pi and the
cultural relativism implied by "imaginary" numbers. 3 credit hours.
AGRI SCIENCE 200: OUR FRIEND FERTILIZER. Sponsored and faculty approved by: the Mosaic Co. Benefits of fertilizer application and why local regulations are unfair. Lecture topics include "At Least an Algae Bloom Has Pretty Colors." 3 credit hours. (Taught in conjunction with the University of
Florida.)
AGRI SCIENCE 202: OUR FRIEND CORN SYRUP. Sponsored and faculty approved by: American Corn Council and DiabTech Inc., makers of adult-onset diabetes pharmaceuticals. Why the entire U.S. food supply should be converted to high-fructose corn syrup. 3 credit hours.
PUBLIC ADMIN 305: MODERN PLANNING PRACTICE. Sponsored and faculty approved by: Florida Chamber of Commerce. Why communities do not need to consider the impacts of growth on traffic, schools and other services. 3 credit hours.
POLI SCI 400: JUST A RICH GUY WHO PAID US ENOUGH TO OFFER HIS OWN COURSE. Sponsor and faculty screener: Fred Z. Jernigan, age 56, who will explain how things really work. 1 credit hour.
POLI SCI 400: EXPLORATION OF U.S. CITIZENSHIP. Sponsored and faculty
approved by: Committee of Real Americans, If You Know What We Mean, and We Think You Do. Lecture topics include forensic examination of birth
certificates; deconstruction of constitutional citizenship; field trip to
Kenya; legal claims that Hawaii was never a valid state in the first place.
3 credit hours.
METEOROLOGY 300: CLIMATE 'CHANGE.' Sponsored and faculty approved by: National Council on Digging Up Fossil Fuels and Setting Them on Fire. Topics include, "It Snowed Last Winter Up North, Didn't It?" 3 credit hours.
EDU 300: TRUTH AND CRITICAL THINKING. Sponsored and faculty approved by: No one outside the university. Description of traditional academic inquiry as
the search for knowledge and insight regardless of who pays for it. (May be
canceled for lack of interest.)
* "Money is truth."
[Last modified: May 11, 2011 06:48 PM]
5 comments:
There are two places that I really worry about: colleges and media. WHen these get corrupted by special interests, divergent thinking starts going away. This is as dangerous as propaganda.
FSU is lucky to get the attention of Charles Koch and of his Foundation. It's his money. He has supported less government and individual rights for decades.
Previous anon, there are two ways of looking at this. When education stops serving society first and foremost, you start to get all kinds of pollution in the academic atmosphere. In a perfect world, you will have everyone participating with divergent thinking. In reality, it does not always work that way. It's just like anything else. Go ask the tobacco industry or big Pharma. Universities play an important role in R and D, but when I hear Koch, my ears prick up. They are a couple of crazy Neocons and I believe that they are really damaging the landscape.
My take is here: http://counterpolitics.com/2011/05/koch-fsu-issue-is-overblown/
Essentially, I think this issue is cry wolf. Don't get me wrong this will impact FSU negatively, but there is no loss to academic freedom.
FSU should tread very carefully and they are pushing the issue but ultimately, they have not crossed a line.
Also, University of Chicago used to have the biggest collection of academics proposing laissez-faire economics, don't think that wasn't a result of grants and donations as well. This is nothing new.
When corporations and tycoons are taxed less, the taxes they had been paying must be made up by the remainder of the taxpaying base. I think the Fanjuls and the Kochs are well able to pay for the replacement of bridges and highways, upon which they drive their luxury cars... why should the middle class bankroll the rich? (Trickle down? Nonsense!)
Post a Comment