Politico reports this morning, "Jeb Bush to take Obama to school". Regular readers of EOM have a pretty good idea what that means: "mean" as in angry, petulant, and overdosed with certainty. That's Jeb! to a T.
Nationally, Jeb! is competing with Newt Gingrich for the grand old man of the Republican party. They are planning on the electorate's ultra-short memory span to propel them past their legacies of public policy errors. Gingrich, with his new found religion and values, is destined for a fast fade. It is not just age. It is history, which he teaches.
Jeb!, on the other hand, benefits from the full support of the Karl Rove/Grover Norquist School of Thieves. History is not fact, it is what you make it to be. If not for the miserable record of George W. Bush in the White House, he would have a shot at the presidency. As it is, Jeb! has successfully dodged his history in Florida, including the mess he made of public education and the mean politics of Florida's charter schools, through which politically influential entrepreneurs are institutionalizing conservative ideology in formative education of the next generations.
Politico is right, that Obama's appearance alongside Jeb! in Miami today is meant to appeal to independents and moderates. Who can be against removing bad principals and moving bad teachers out of the rank and file in public schools? The dilemma, here, is not so much for Obama-- so far, if he can raise the money he looks good in 2012-- as it is for the unions. Protecting the worst parts of a bad, broken public education system does not serve the unions' interests. So long as the unions are unclear about their responsibility to help fix what's broken, they are leaving President Obama out on a limb.
And it wouldn't be Obama sawing off the limb that holds him, up. It wouldn't necessary be Jeb!, either. But the interests behind Jeb!? Their chain saws are already revv'ing. Can you hear them in Miami? (Click, 'read more' for the Politico article)
Jeb Bush to take Obama to school
By: Abby Phillip
March 4, 2011 04:44 AM EST
Just the other day, President Barack Obama bestowed a Medal of Freedom on former President George H.W. Bush. But it’s not every day that he spends time with a member of the Bush family whose national political career could still be ahead of him.
On Friday, however, the president will tour a Miami high school with former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, a rare moment of bipartisan collaboration on an education reform agenda that, at least in vague terms, the two can agree on.
There’s an upside for both.
For Obama, his 2012 reelection platform will be shaped by how his reform agenda is received in swing states like Florida. And while Bush’s political ambitions remain largely unknown, an education-focused event keeps him squarely on message, if his long-term goal is using his signature issue to broaden his appeal beyond the Florida border.
“When Bush was governor he stood out as far as the reforms he put forth and still advocates for,” a Florida Republican official said.
Friday’s event is more of what Bush has done since leaving office in 2007, advocating for education reform across the country. And it provides almost no new clues about what he plans to do in the future.
As governor, Bush pushed an aggressive, and polarizing, education reform agenda that focused on testing, charter schools, merit-based pay and school vouchers. But since the state legislative battles that raged throughout his terms have died down, he has enjoyed a reputation of having been one of the nation’s strongest education governors.
“Because of high expectations for students, hard-edge policies that focus schools on learning and an array of choices for families, the Sunshine State is leading the nation in rising student achievement,” Bush said in a statement this week, adding that he looked forward to sharing the state’s “model for student success” with Obama and Secretary of Education Arne Duncan.
In theory, Obama’s education reform agenda makes room for many of the same ideas.
His Race to the Top program, which requires states to produce aggressive education reform plans in order to compete for billions in federal money, has pushed states to eliminate charter-school caps, open their educational charters to merit-based-pay systems, and raise student performance standards.
But as evidence of how tricky an issue education can be for a Democratic president, Obama has also actively disavowed support for school vouchers as a “solution” to the country’s education problems and has worked hard to persuade skeptical teachers unions to support merit-based pay and the lifting of charter-school caps.
By courting Bush, Obama is aligning himself with a politician who has no regard for constituencies such as teachers, but whose overt opposition in 2012 could damage Obama’s own hard-earned credibility on education reform.
From the perspective of some of Florida’s traditional Democratic constituencies, Bush’s education reform agenda leaves a lot to be desired. Four years after Bush left office, critics see a legacy of tension with teachers unions, underfunded schools and just moderate gains in student performance.
“I think [Bush] has a very positive persona when it comes to public education outside of Florida, but the experiment has been a failed experiment in Florida,” said Dan Smith, a political science professor at the University of Florida.
Miami Central Senior High School, where Obama and Bush will visit, is a school the Obama administration believes exemplifies the success of the “turnaround model” for failing schools. Bush selected the school as an example of a school that has made gains through reform.
But its approach will also be an integral part of how Obama seeks to “fix” the No Child Left Behind education reform bill that Bush’s older brother, President George W. Bush, championed.
Changing No Child Left Behind will be Obama’s next major foray into education reform, an issue on which Republicans historically have maintained a strategic advantage.
If the White House pushes Congress to take up overhauling that bill this year, as Obama says he plans to do, that debate could define Obama’s reelection platform on education.
Obama’s connection with Bush can be seen as an effort to win over independents and moderate Republicans — in the same vein as December’s tax-cut compromise — even as he soothes anxieties in his own party. Obama’s speech in Florida on Friday will very likely be geared toward striking that same balance.
“I don’t think the president standing with Jeb Bush is an endorsement of everything Jeb Bush has done as governor,” said Steve Shale, the 2008 Obama campaign’s Florida director. “The president is pointing out that there are things that were done in Florida that we can all learn from.”
© 2011 Capitol News Company, LLC
9 comments:
Ha!
I just had a thought (and it's a mean one).
Obama/Bush for President! (or Bush/Obama if Bush wants as what's another compromise in search of true bipartisanship?)
And they ain't that far apart on the issues, babies!
Ha ha ha ha ha ha
S
P.S. Omenish word ver: "berat"
I have never done this on this blog, but I am reposting what someone else said, because it is brilliant and it outlines so many problems with school system. Here is what that person said:
Anonymous said...
"My daughter goes to Gables. She was forced to take many AP coursed because it boosted the score of the school. When they scored the school, did they look at her grades? NO. Did she pass any AP tests? NO. Did they count those states when they declared Gables an A school? NO. How do you become an A school when there are students that don't even speak English? You manipulate the numbers on the backs of the students.
So, now they are going to Miami Central to brag about how well they did raising their test scores. Look at the numbers, people, not the overall school grade and how that grade was manipulated.
Now, guess who makes money from testing, computer programs, curriculum, etc. etc. etc. All roads lead back to the white guy at Miami Central standing with Obama. And let's remember that he never went to a public school and has no intention of ever seeing a family member at public school.
Another comment: I just took over a first grade class in a very poor neighborhood in Miami. Within one week I have already given them two assessment tests, which cuts into instructional time. It's a bunch of BS."
"PEOPLE THAT SEND THEIR KIDS TO PRIVATE SCHOOLS HAVE NO BUSINESS RUNNING THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS. IF THESE SCHOOLS ARE NOT GOOD ENOUGH FOR YOUR KIDS, THEN BUTT OUT!"
Wow, great points, right?
Goes to show how off track Democrats really are!!! I am an Independent-Liberal to Center and it scares the hell out of me to see that Obama doesn't mind the CONTAMINATION factor... could the Prez be as much a street-walker as any normal Republican? Probably! Obama + Bush makes me think twice, and I would rather vote for Satan than for anything that emanates the stench of the Bush name. Ugh!
Hey Anon that quoted my comment that I wrote before I left to teach my first graders at 6:50 am,
Thanks for quoting me.
THE OTHER M
Hey other M, no problem.
Here are some things to think about. Charter schools can use MDCPS to purchase things, but they don't pay any of the overhead costs it takes to administer that process. How is that fair? So we set up the purchasing agreements, we put up the money to purchase supplies and we warehouse and insure and deliver all that stuff - FOR NO FEE? Aren't these private companies?
Here is a reality: lots of charter schools close every year. THey don't give back the FTE money! We don't even ask for it back. Those kids have to go back to our public schools and we have to not only pay to educate them once - we pay to educate them twice!!! So tell me, is this kind of like opening a restaurant. You keep two sets of books and then you close down when you have a lot of money in your pocket? Shouldn't we be taking a look back at those schools and getting our money back?
I am beginning to understand why these charter schools are popping up all over. Educating kids really is big money. You get the materials on the backs of the public school system and you hire your teachers for less. If you close, you get to keep the FTE.
Tell me more about this funding model. I think I want to buy me a school.
Paul - we have one rule...don't insult the blogger. You are free to go elsewhere don't come here to be insulting.
Disagree without being disagreeable right? I know the drill.
One nice thing about my first grade class is that it only has 19 students. (18 is the cap, but...) Anyway, the size is now a reasonable number. I'm afraid that with the cutbacks coming and Scott's total disregard for the voters' mandates, we will once again see our classes grow so that a teacher once again becomes a babysitter and crowd controller rather than a skilled educator.
As I see Jeb! getting his way to undermine the public education system and Obama thinking that tying stupid ass test scores to salaries, I understand that the money in education is elsewhere. But that is not why teachers go into education. Their only consolation is a half decent retirement package (another pile of money Scott can't wait to get his hands on).
A teacher trying to cash in on the education system is like Gimleteye leaving his environmental groups and joining "Free Market Florida". Some of us have a moral compass and must follow our hearts. You can have all the money in the world, but did you make a difference to your fellow man? Think of these tombstones:
Jeb Bush
He sure had a shitload of money.
Gimleteye
Friend of the Environment
TOM
Post a Comment