Friday, October 15, 2010

Amendment 4 on WBPT and in The Miami Herald: A Reflection ... by gimleteye

The program on Amendment 4 was taped on public broadcasting's "WBPT Issues" yesterday, Amendment 4 is the highly anticipated ballot referendum to change the Florida Constitution in the following way: the measure would break up the immoveable politics of land use, bonding developers and special interests to local elected officials through campaign contributions. It provides that changes to local master plans would be accomplished after a final vote; not by city or county commissioners, but by local voters. On the WPBT program I am one of the speakers in favor, alongside Lesley Blackner, co-founder of Florida Hometown Democracy. View it here.

Amendment 4 was also front page news in The Miami Herald yesterday. Here's my quote, as "... Alan Farago, a longtime Miami-Dade environmental activist who was among the early champions of the Hometown Democracy effort, describes growth management as "basically a carcass that has been fed over by special interests. Everyone who has warned me about the issues of unintended consequences [from Amendment 4] failed to acknowledge the set of unintended consequences to Florida's landscape is unacceptable now." Read the Herald story, here.

Last night, as I was drifting off I thought about a comment that one of the opponents of the measure, real estate consultant Jack McCabe, made on the WPBT program: how Florida's economy is dependent on development and construction and how it is necessary to keep expanding the tax base to avoid an economic collapse. This argument is the mother's milk of Florida's political and economic status quo.

I remember being shocked when I first heard the same argument nearly twenty five years ago. At the time, I had just moved to the Florida Keys. My children were young. I expected to be able to show them as they grew the profound beauty of the place I had experienced, first, in the 1970's. But by the late 1980's, all that was going, going, gone. I became involved in environmental issues and local politics as a result. Those politics revolved around land use decisions whose individual and cumulative impacts severely threatened unique natural resources that comprise the foundation of the Key's multi-billion dollar tourism economy. The majority of the Monroe County Commission proudly self-identified as "The Concrete Coalition". They were led on the county commission by a local version of Tom DeLay-- an insecticide salesman-- powerful local developers, land use lawyers and locals who were cashing in on real estate; and they all made exactly the same argument, with the same words, that Jack McCabe made yesterday: you have to expand to the tax base to be able to afford the costs of growth.

Amendment 4 grew out of the abounding frustration of citizens in Florida who saw what they valued in this place, trashed and overwhelmed by that illogic: inadequate schools, roadways, poorly planned infrastructure and sacrifices to quality of life that constantly creep in the wrong direction. And it is because of Amendment 4 that took years to arrive-- an election-- that its opponents waged and passed their own change to the Constitution; requiring that any further changes must pass in a general state-wide election by 60 percent or the referendum fails. No other state in the nation has such a high threshold.

Today in Florida, we live the consequences of what Amendment 4 seeks to address. The costs of growth have far exceeded the capacity of the tax base; that's why real estate taxes are increasing and the cost of government will continue to increase for the foreseeable future. The current system of growth management is not only broken at the local level, at the state capitol the Florida legislature is determined to erase the growth regulatory agency. Period. (Related note: check out what is happening to St. Joe Corporation.)

In the Keys when I was a quarter century younger, there was a young attorney for The Wilderness Society who stood at the podium and public hearings of the planning commission, who inspired me to dedicate much of my time as a community activist. His name is Ross Burnaman, and Ross is a co-founder of the Florida Hometown Democracy movement. In the early 1990's Ross moved to Tallahassee where he is now a sole practitioner of law. The point is that Florida Hometown Democracy did not spring up from nowhere: this movement was grounded in the manifest failures of growth management in South Florida. Right here. It grew up right here in the Chambers of the Miami-Dade County Commission and the City of Miami, where the pleas of citizens from the podium are routinely ignored by elected officials on cell phones with lobbyists or snoozing or joking with each other or showing their disrespect for ordinary people and ordinary taxpayers taking entire days to attend land use hearings where, for the most part, they are ignored.

So far as I am concerned, Florida Hometown Democracy is for George Kuntz of Key Colony Beach, who attended each and every land use hearing in the Keys for a decade and testified against land use changes, who fought and scrapped until his last days. Amendment 4 is for Grace Maniello of Big Pine Key, a minority voice on the Monroe County Planning Commission, who endured the taunts and ridicule and isolation in a place where platted lots had been used, for generations, as payola. Grace and Fred and Freddy: the whole family fought the good fight and they are gone, too. Amendment 4 is for friends who never gave up on the bonefish, the bay in front of Islamorada stretching to Flamingo, and the sweet virtues of place that can't be recovered once they are lost. Amendment 4 has similar backstories across the state of Florida. It is from people who love this state. It is an heroic effort by a group of dedicated volunteers around the state of Florida who have made sacrifices-- in the case of Lesley Blackner, who put in nearly $1 million of her own money-- to put this measure on the November ballot: the fact of Amendment 4 is for each and every citizen who tried to protect a river, or stream, or wetland or the character of a neighborhood and cohesion of a community. It is for every person who summoned the courage to speak in public in a forum where other more practiced, monied voices rose up to bitch them out. They have the money and the influence, and right now, two weeks before the election, they are getting ready to spend the $10 to $15 million they have raised to defeat Amendment 4.

While Lesley Blackner has been the visible, public champion of this movement; Ross Burnaman helped forge the measures passage through and over hurdles and roadblocks thrown up in its way, including the third political party in America: The US Chamber of Commerce. Twenty five years ago, when Florida Keys public officials were making the same weak arguments in favor of sacrificing quality of life and natural resources to expanded tax base, that could only happen by weakening environmental protection rules and regulations, Ross Burnaman was tough as nails. Today, special interests make the same arguments, and Ross Burnaman is still tough as nails.

I hope Amendment 4 passes. The public is in an uproar in the grinding economic collapse; the worst since the Depression. Hearing Amendment 4's opponents darkly warn of lost jobs and catastrophe if the measure passes is like watching people clinging to the hull of a capsized ship blaming the water. The scent of extremism is heavy in the air. Amendment 4 will pass, if voters on November 2nd read the ballot issue all the way through.

10 comments:

miaexile said...

Watched the show last night and you both did great. It sickens me to hear people like McCabe think we can continue to be fooled into believing that Florida is only good enough for tourism and construction jobs. That is exactly what Florida has to get away from - the old notion that we can't do anything else. We all know tourism jobs don't pay much and construction is cyclical - we need the jobs of the future right here in Florida. And yes, there are already enough empty homes/condos as well as approved plans for millions more so we've got the room for all the workers of the future already waiting..

Lee Allen said...

As ably pointed out by Miami-Dade Planner Subrata Basu in the Herald article, the passage of Amendment 4 will only serve to make Florida's current development pattern permanent. Approving the Amendment will do nothing to encourage or support innovative planning, something that many places are finally getting around to doing.

Does anyone think that the City and County Commissions of 1990 were paragons of planning? I hope so, because the decisions made back then are going to be the last major planning in Florida if the Amendment passes.

While I do not doubt Mr. Burnaman's motives, he has crafted a disastrously overbroad amendment that no one who understands the planning process thinks is a good idea.

Anonymous said...

I voted today for it. We have no choice if we are to control growth and have some semblance of maintaining the wonderful environment we inherited. I also voted for Crist for my selfish best interests as well as for the 50 million Americans who are on social security, and the 50 million others who have worked all their lives and will be on social security in the next 20 years.

Geniusofdespair said...

You guys rocked in this debate! McCabe met his match and then some. He stepped in shit a few times and Gimleteye pounced -- and scored some knockout punches.

Anonymous said...

Great writing. Should be a Herald column.

By the way, Carl Haisen wrote a great piece supporting Yes on Amendment 4.

Anonymous said...

I have the upmost respect for Mr. Basu and IF he was making the decisions we may not need amendment 4, BUT he is ignored or muzzeled by the government/lobbyist hacks. Professional planners do not have the control they need to plan effectively. Too many times I sat in the chambers hearing an application where planners recommended denial and the commissioners approved it anyway. Until we take land-use decisions out of the hands of the governments, I will support amendment 4. Maybe the public will listen to the planners better than politicians looking for their next campaign contribution. I see planners as having an even bigger role under amnedment 4.

Hayes Bowen said...

Alan and Leslie, thank you for speaking out for us, ordinary taxpayers and the citizens of the State of Florida. Clearly, after watching this interview I now understand which side is looking to enrich themselves and which side has the citizens and the environments best interest. Mr. McCabes threats of an economic collapse of epic proportions is is purely self and special interest motivated. With enough land uses changes already approved and on the books for growth across this state to continue for decades to come, we need Amendment 4 now more than ever. Mr. Schulmans threats of building 1 house per 5 acres outside the UDB in the East Everglades area does not make economic sense to the current land owners and thus it has not happened. Allowing developers and lawyers continued influence on elected officials will one day certainly change the zoning of the East Everglades area allowing for much denser development and greater profits for all those involved. Our voices, while maybe heard, are certainly not heeded at commission meetings. Eventually projects get approved as votes are bought and deals are made. Unmarked bills in brown paper bags will always get you what you want if you are willing to wait and play the game. Mr McCabes claim that no other state in our nation is looking to pass this type of Amendment is pointless. He fails to realize no other state in our nation is a narrow strip of land surrounded by water on three sides, has a limited fresh water supply and contains two of the most irreplaceable and threatened natural ecosystems in the world, The Florida Everglades and The Florida Keys. Personally, I can not imagine our precious peninsula accommodating the additional 8-15 million more baby boomers he projects will relocate to Florida in the near future. My only hope now is that we all educate ourselves and VOTE YES on Amendment 4 to protect our future.

Geniusofdespair said...

For those of you who don't know...there are people from the other side that are paid to surf the web whenever amenment 4 is written about. They come on our site and write the other sides talking points. Usually I delete them, but sometimes I just warn you...

Alexandria Larson said...

The only thing that will save Florida is Amendment 4.Whenever someone asks me I point out the obvious, its easier to bribe 7 commissioners than 70,000 voters.It's quick the doubters get it right away.I've been at the podium and only two things stop crooked commissioners getting caught and going to prison or exposing their conflicts in public.Here in Palm Beach County the more that get arrested the better.The argument that A4 will destroy the economy is a joke that already happened without Amendment 4.Thank you Leslie,Ross,And every other person who has tried to save Florida.Funny how we don't get paid but the crooked lobbyists,developers,polluters,& easily bribed elected officials seem to have an endless cash flow.

Anonymous said...

I just returned from a road trip to Jax via Orlando & St. Augustine. Saw lots of Vote NO on Amendment 4 signs, typically in front of realtors and construction company offices, and quite a few along I-95 on large parcels of vacant land. The only vote Yes sign I saw was the one I placed in a relative's front yard near Jax Beach. Not sure what this means. The disinformation commercials are also being aired on the radio up there with not a lot to counter it.