One of the main themes of this blog is how the economic crisis enmeshing the United States was caused by an institutional willingness-- across industries and state boundaries-- to miscalculate risk. One of the ways this happened in Florida was shifting the cost of pollution from polluters to taxpayers. This achieved the purpose of stimulating and subsidizing low-cost economic growth. Another way to accomplish this was perfected in Florida: make sure that state regulations sounded as though they addressed pollution and polluters, but write them with loopholes big enough to make them meaningless. The revolving door between the regulated and regulators didn't help either: the game has been all about sounding sober and responsible, but behaving like drunken sailors. The conservative approach would have been to force polluters to clean up their own messes. (Florida voters passed such a measure requiring Big Sugar to be primarily responsible for cleaning up its pollution of the Everglades in 1996 but the Florida legislature and its GOP majority has not lifted a finger, since.) The bottom line: the fiscal conservatives who dominate the Florida legislature are for shifting costs that penalize taxpayers in order to benefit big campaign contributors. The most outstanding example: the failure of Florida to regulate nutrient runoff from cities and farms. Despite federal laws like the Clean Water Act, the state of Florida -- at the insistence of GOP "conservatives"-- has refused to enact regulations based on numeric standards and count them. (Instead, we have "narrative" standards of water quality from FDEP.) Another example: how Big Sugar pressured the legislature, during the Jeb Bush years in Tallahassee, to re-write the pollution standard that formed the basis for the 1992 state and federal settlement agreement to stop pollution of the Everglades. In 2009, another federal court overturned what Jeb sought to do for Big Sugar. Since that time, more than 15 years ago, nutrient pollution in the Everglades-- as the EPA's own study confirmed-- has is significantly worse.
Now comes news that a federal judge has ordered the US EPA to step and "set a state's water quality standards for nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorous that flow into waterways from fertilized lawns, sewage plants, farm fields, cattle pastures and a host of other sources." ('Florida coalition targets pending federal pollution rules', November 22, 2009, Miami Herald) What will the EPA do? (please click, 'read more')
It is no surprise Florida's Growth Machine--from Big Sugar to the Florida Farm Bureau, the Florida Chamber of Commerce and Associated Industries--is rallying to lobby the Florida congressional delegation against the new rule. But the wrong guy is in the White House.
These pro-business groups are the same that made billions from miscalculating risk is the overdevelopment of Florida during the late, great housing and construction boom. They are against subsidies, of course, unless those subsidies are for them.
The politics of nutrient pollution are fascinating: the costs of growth would be higher-- if industry, agriculture, and municipalities were required to clean up pollution at its source; this conservative approach is incorporated in federal law but has not been followed because of undue influence by special interests (see, above). While the public has been riveted by the debate on health care, another indication of progress has been virtually un-noted: the re-awakening of the US EPA; an environmental agency whose regulatory purposes withered under President Obama's predecessors.
Florida's polluters are cry babies, but they are used to getting their way. They are mobilizing to defeat President Obama and the Democratic majority in Congress in the 2010 mid term elections and beyond. The banners they wave will be lack of progress on the economy and the costs of health care but those banners will be paid for by profits that depend on shifting the costs of pollution.
Nov. 16,2009
Judge Approves Historic EPA Settlement: EPA and Florida Must Set Limits on Fertilizer and Animal Waste Pollution in State Waters Polluters’ Arguments Rejected in Favor of the Environment
TALLAHASSEE – A federal judge in Tallahassee today approved a historic consent decree which requires the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to set legal limits for the widespread nutrient poisoning that triggers harmful algae blooms in Florida waters.
The change in federal policy comes 13 months after five environmental groups filed a major lawsuit to compel the federal government to set strict limits on nutrient poisoning in public waters.
Nutrients like phosphorous and nitrogen poison Florida’s waters every time it rains; running off agricultural operations, fertilized landscapes, and septic systems. The poison runoff triggers slimy algae outbreaks which foul Florida’s beaches, lakes, rivers, and springs more each year, threatening public health, closing swimming areas, and even shutting down a southwest Florida drinking water plant.
Ruling from the bench, U.S. District Judge Robert Hinkle rejected arguments made by polluters who sought to delay cleanup and get out of complying with the Clean Water Act. Florida Agriculture Commissioner Charles Bronson, the Florida Pulp and Paper Association, four of the state’s five water management districts, sewage plant operators, the Florida Farm Bureau, and others tried to derail the settlement.
Today’s action has nationwide implications. Currently, Florida and most other states have only vague limits regulating nutrient pollution. The U.S. EPA will now begin the process of imposing quantifiable – and enforceable -- water quality standards to tackle nutrient pollution, using data collected by the Florida DEP.
“The Clean Water Act is strong medicine,” said Earthjustice attorney David Guest. “The EPA can now get on with the work of setting standards that will clean up our waters. We’re hoping to see safe drinking water, clear springs, lakes and rivers again.”
A 2008 DEP report concluded that half of the state’s rivers and more than half of its lakes had poor water quality. The problem is compounded when nutrient-poisoned waters are used as drinking water sources. Disinfectants like chlorine and chloramine can react with the dissolved organic compounds, contaminating drinking water with harmful chemical byproducts.
Exposure to these blue-green algae toxins – when people drink the water, touch it, or inhale vapors from it - can cause rashes, skin and eye irritation, allergic reactions, gastrointestinal upset, serious illness, and even death. In June 2008, a water treatment plant serving 30,000 Florida residents was shut down after a toxic blue-green algae bloom on the Caloosahatchee River threatened the plant’s water supply.
“The long-lasting and worsening pollution of our lakes, rivers, beaches and springs hurts Florida's economy and needs to end,” said Florida Wildlife Federation president Manley Fuller. “This day has been a long time coming.”
“Asking for clean water is not a stretch,” said St. Johns Riverkeeper Neil Armingeon. “There are algae blooms even today in the St. Johns River. Moving forward quickly is imperative.”
“Florida is one step closer to having the tools it needs to adequately address the threats that nutrient pollution poses to our quality of life and our tourist economy,” said Frank Jackalone of the Sierra Club.
The public interest law firm Earthjustice filed the suit in the Northern District of Florida on behalf of the Florida Wildlife Federation, the Conservancy of Southwest Florida, the Environmental Confederation of Southwest Florida, St. John’s Riverkeeper, and the Sierra Club in July 2008. The suit challenged an unacceptable decade-long delay by the state and federal governments in setting limits for nutrient pollution. Speaking from the bench today, Judge Hinkle said the delay was a matter of serious concern.
The EPA originally gave Florida a 2004 deadline to set limits for nutrient pollution, which the state failed to meet. The EPA was then supposed to set limits itself, but failed to do so. Under the administration of President George W. Bush, the EPA let the states off the hook by allowing them to formulate plans without deadlines for action.
The dire state of Florida’s polluted waters made the delay unacceptable and dangerous, so the five groups sued.
Florida’s current narrative standard says: “In no case shall nutrient concentrations of a body of water be altered so as to cause an imbalance in natural populations of aquatic flora and fauna.”
Clearly, nutrient poisoning is altering water bodies all over Florida. As Earthjustice noted in a letter it sent to the EPA:
“Potentially toxigenic cyanobacteria have been found statewide, including river and stream systems such as the St. Johns River in the Northeast Region and the Caloosahatchee River in the Southwest Region. In the Southeast Region, toxin levels in the St. Lucie River and estuary during an algae bloom in 2005 were 300 times above suggested drinking water limits and 60 times above suggested recreational limits. Warning signs had to be posted by local health authorities warning visitors and residents not to come into contact with the water. Lake Okeechobee, which is categorized under state regulations as a drinking water source, is now subject to almost year-round blue-green algae blooms as a result of nutrient pollution.”
The St. Johns River has been under a health advisory due to a toxigenic blue green algae bloom. In 2005, a similar bloom shut down all boat traffic on the river.
Tampa Bay has suffered an outbreak this year of Pyrodinium bahamense, and Takayama tuberculata has sullied waters around San Marco Island.
Nutrient pollution also fuels the explosive growth of invasive water plants like hydrilla, which now clogs countless springs, rivers and lakes.
David Guest, Earthjustice, (850) 228-3337
Manley Fuller, Florida Wildlife Federation, (850) 656-7113; cell (850) 567-7129
Andrew McElwaine, Conservancy of Southwest Florida, (239) 438-5472
Frank Jackalone, Sierra Club, (727) 824-8813, ext. 302; cell (727) 804-1317
Neil Armingeon; St. Johns Riverkeeper, (904) 256-7591; cell (904) 635-4554
3 comments:
Our own DERM is a case in point. In decades of tracking zoning/CDMP applications, DERM has not approved only a handful of applications. Some of the applications they have supported have resulted in contamination of drinking water. How can we expect the state and feds to protect us when the local DERM is derelict? Maybe the judge's orders will make a difference but I have given up hope that our governments give a crap about the welfare of the people they are supposed to represent; it's all about big business and their lobbyists.
Politicians are to blame for their lack of leadership and cowtowing to these special interests. The government is willing to spend taxpayer money on everything but pollution control or clean up. See today's Miami Herald letter from the Port of Miami director lauding the deep water dredging of Biscayne Bay (with deeper burial of all the sewer pipes coming from the Virginia Key Water Treatment facility) and construction of the port tunnel to accommodate supertankers that will come through the Panama Canal - millions in taxpayer monies will be used. But yet, Miami Dade County is fighting shutting down the outfall pipe that spews treated sewage into the ocean from the Virginia Key Sewage Treatment facility. Too expensive, they say. Well, it's more expensive to deal with the health consequences of poisoning citizens with contaminated water we drink and swim in. Until it hits our tourism economy, they won't pay attention.
St. Pete Times
November 24, 2009
Toward clean water
Published Monday, November 23, 2009
A federal judge was right to step in last week and clear the way for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to establish limits on pollution in Florida's lakes, rivers and bays. The state has sat on its hands for 11 years while runoff from farms, sewer plants, golf courses and homes has put the environment, public health and the tourist economy at risk. State officials should be embarrassed for sticking by such major polluters as paper, pulp and phosphate manufacturers and for tarring the cleanup as a back-door tax. The deal should help reverse the deterioration of Florida waters and prod the state and private industry to adopt sustainable business practices.
U.S. District Judge Robert Hinkle said he would approve an agreement environmental groups reached with the EPA to limit the amount of nutrient pollution in Florida's waterways. These groups sued the EPA last year in an effort to compel the federal government to intervene in Florida under the Clean Water Act. The EPA told the states in 1998 to limit nutrient pollution in surface waters, and warned it would do it for them if no action was taken by 2004. But the state left its rules vague. With the judge's ruling, the EPA can impose specific limits for such nutrients as phosphorous and nitrogen. The goal is to reduce the levels of sewage, fertilizer and manure in the waters. The pollution triggers toxic algae, kills fish and causes infections and respiratory problems for swimmers, boaters and beachgoers.
Predictably, the polluters and the state bureaucracy that enables them oppose the EPA's involvement, saying it will lead to arbitrary pollution limits and require a back-door "federal water tax" to clean up what's now flowing into public waterways. Both arguments are ridiculous. The pollution limits are arbitrary now; if anything, quantifying the pollution caps into actual levels for specific waterways will give industrial polluters more clarity. And industries have no way of knowing what costs consumers might face until the EPA establishes the pollution limits. That process will continue through October. The opponents, including two former state environmental secretaries, are seeking a reprieve from Congress. That shouldn't happen.
Public waterways should not be dumping grounds for industrial waste. Clean water has a cost — but so do polluted springs, closed beaches, toxic rivers and tainted drinking water supplies. An analysis of state waterways last year found poor water quality in 28 percent of river miles, 25 percent of the lake acreage and 59 percent of the square miles of estuaries. The state Department of Environmental Protection also reported that after trending downward for 20 years, levels of phosphorous pollution began rising again in 2000, likely due to new development.
The EPA would set pollution limits for freshwater next year and for saltwater bodies in 2011. They cannot come too soon. The state's waterways are vital to its people, its fishing and tourist industries and its ability to grow. Florida's 12,000 square miles of surface water rank it third in the nation in total water area. The nutrient limits should help reduce pollution in the short term and force regulators and manufacturers to rethink how Florida farms, builds and disposes of its sewage and industrial waste.
Post a Comment