I'm intrigued-- if that is the right word-- how the mainstream media highlights volunteerism in our communities. NBC Nightly News, for instance, has a segment "Making a Difference". It is along the lines of 1000 Points of Light: remember those from the first Bush White House? Miami Today has its "Newsmaker" feature. It is basically an extension of the Chamber of Commerce. The Herald is AWOL, except perhaps for the society page. You wouldn't find any volunteers in any of these places who pitch in to help protect communities from the persistent threats to our quality of life and to the environment, for example. It is schizophrenic, isn't it: the stories are all about "green" and global warming, and yet the people who are making a difference on the ground, in our neighborhoods-- who butt up against the business elite and status quo-- are invisible to the general public. Not even WLRN, public radio, ventures into this realm. Well, there are a few activists who do deserve recognition.
There are a good examples of people who are making a difference. Barry White is one. Barry is an effective activist. He and colleagues like Eric Prince learned about the way communities in South Florida are planned and grow, by participating and paying attention to the government decisions required to meet the objectives of the State of Florida: that growth should occur in an orderly way that does not unfairly burden taxpayers with gross hits to quality of life, to traffic, schools, water supply and quality and other costs that are scarcely absorbed by developer impact fees. As a consequence of paying attention, Barry White is making a difference.
If you have free time-- perhaps a student, perhaps retired, or waiting for that next big thing-- you might consider learning how to become an effective civic activist. The environment happens to be the route I took to engagement with our shared world. You might be concerned about good government, about political corruption, and want to lend a hand to leave this place, wherever you are, in better shape than you found it. A few local groups do a great job on this front, at a time of great need and with very, very scarce funding: Clean Water Action, Tropical Audubon Society, the Urban Environment League, and Friends of the Everglades. Each group has a slightly different focus, but all the same goal: protect our communities from bad decisions and poor compromise based on distorted logic and, often, corruption. Click 'read more', for Mr. White's recent letter to the State of Florida.
Mr. White focuses, rightly, on problems in the western and southern part of Miami-Dade County, where the biggest pressure for growth has now created traffic nightmares and ghost suburbs. He knows as well as anyone how the gears of the Growth Machine mesh together; from county commissioners, to lobbyists, the engineering cartel, and all the way to mortgage bankers and big campaign contributors. Below, you will find letter that Mr. White wrote to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, objecting on behalf of an organization he helped to start, the transmittal of a land use amendment that would proliferate more sprawl outside the Urban Development Boundary; all for the purpose of helping a land speculator caught with pricey property. You can also learn about the Hold The Line effort to halt movement of the Urban Development Boundary in Miami-Dade, here. You can also check our archive feature, "UDB" or use the search engine to enter relevant terms. I've been poking around some older blog posts, and here is a good one to help you understand the underlying politics in Miami-Dade.
TO: The Department Of Community Affairs, State Of Floirda
Re: Ferro Application, Miami-Dade County, Florida (SW 167 Ave & SW 104 St)
It is our understanding that the Board Of County Commissioners (BCC) has forwarded the subject application to DCA for consideration and comment. We have the following concerns regarding this application.
IMPACT ON AGRICULTURE
The 9.9 acre tract is beyond the UDB. It will be the first developed land beyond the UDB at that point, it will be surrounded on three sides by agricultural land and is contiguous with extensive agricultural land. Agriculture in Miami-Dade county was down to 67,050 acres (2007). In 2002 that number was 90,373, a decline of 26%. Studies have determined that 55,000 acres of contiguous land in agriculture is required to support the industry. That is the minimum required for suppliers and services to the industry to remain economically viable. At the current rate of decline, agriculture, which employs over 20,000 people and represents over $661 million in gross sales will essentially be dead in Miami Dade county five years.
NO NET LOSS
We cannot keep taking land out of agriculture. THE BCC seems to consistently ignore the provision that the CDMP requires that there be no net loss in agricultural land. With no clear statement of how much land is to be retained in agriculture, there are no guidelines. However, nowhere in the Ferro application does it state how this almost 10 acre loss will be offset and he owns another 95 acres in the area. Actually, since approval of this application will be the camel's nose under the UDB tent, the net loss here will, in time, be the whole industry; how do you offset that?
SUFFICIENT LAND WITHIN THE UDB
In the Lowes ruling, Judge Canter, held that there is sufficient land within the UDB for development; there still is. Development in Miami-Dade County should focus on urban infill, not expansion. There is ample opportunity for serious developers to retain one of the many creative urban planning firms to re-define, and vitalize areas already developed. Coral Way just east of SW 37 Ave is an example of what can be accomplished. New condominiums and retirement housing within walking distance of shops, restaurants, offices, and entrainment on existing transportation routes; this is the model with which real, not opportunistic, developers should be concerned. Making urban areas more attractive, more efficient, more functional, this is the type of building required and merited; not paving over raw land.
NEEDS ASSESSMENT
We would ask if a needs assessment for this project as set out in FL Statute 9-J5 and defined in 9-J5.006, has been completed.
LAND BANKING
Given the current economic downturn in Miami-Dade County, and an anticipation that it will last for many years, this is a project which represents land banking, increasing the value of the property by obtaining re-zoning by investing in legal, lobbying and administrative costs now for flipping the property in five to fifteen years when building might be economically feasible. Should we be allowing this?
IMPACT FEES NEVER SUFFICIENT
Impact fees have not been raised in fifteen years in Miami Dade County and never cover the full cost of bringing infrastructure to a new area. For this, the County must draw on general funds to provide infrastructure, taking funds from under- developed or stressed areas of the County. So, disadvantaged citizens are subsidizing development in new areas and funding urban sprawl.
NO WATER; NO BUILDING PERMIT
We are on permanent water restrictions in Miami-Dade County. The quantity and quality of naturally available water are constant concerns. While our tap water is of the highest quality, interestingly, the South Florida Water Management District cannot tell us exactly, or even roughly, how much naturally occurring water we can count on each year. How can we measure water concurrency under Statute 163 if we do not have this information. If we knew this, we could divide by the amount of water required annually per person and by agriculture and industry and thereby determine the number of people this narrow spit of land can support. After that, no more residential building permits should be issued; re-shape the county through urban infill and planning.
VEGETATION CLEANS THE AQUIFER
Recent research has shown that vegetation above an aquifer serves to remove impurities from it. By reducing the amount of all types of growth on our land we are removing this natural cleansing agent. Gradually paving over our land is killing the Golden Goose. Everyone should read Paving Paradise by Craig Pittman and Matthew Waite. How much land can we afford to pave over for buildings, roads and parking lots.? How much water seepage can we stop and still recharge the aquifer?
TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY QUESTIONABLE
Roads in the area are nearing capacity; new building in this area will bring increased pressure on them. The traffic count figures provided by Planning and Zoning are questionable. They used to tell the exact month and year they were gathered. Now they put one date, July 8, 2009, 9:45:58 AM, for all stations. Similarly, the FDOT station counts were all made on 3/26/09. How is this possible? How can we measure for traffic concurrency? Also, the Miami Dade
County station counts and those of FDOT do not use the same parameters. And there really do not seem to be stations in the vicinity of this project. Where is the publicly available, accurate and understandable, information on traffic counts?
FROM THE GUT
There might be more information here than is required to oppose the Ferro project. But, this is not a zoning matter. It is a question of the sustainability and the quality of life in a major urban area part of a 5.5 million person megalopolis. It is hard to sit in a small city and understand what is like to live with morning and evening gridlock on our roads, millions of hours and millions of gallons wasted every day. It plays on your psyche, and pervades and flavors your life, It saps your spare time and daily energy. No wonder people are leaving and no longer retiring or relocating here. We must foster rational growth, and, for a time at least, shift into neutral until we see where the economy and the environment are heading.
THERE IS NO NEED OR REASON, OTHER THAN DEVELOPERS' GREED,
TO BUILD BEYOND THE CURRENT UDB. PLEASE FOLLOW THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE COUNTY STAFF AND REJECT FERRO FOR A THIRD TIME. THREE STRIKES, YOU'RE OUT!
Thanks for your attention.
Barry J. White
Vice-President
CANT/Citizens Against Nonconcurrency Taskforce, Inc.
14 comments:
Barry doesn't make much sense. He plays right into the hands of those folks that would screw the county for profit. Either he is very naive or he is on their payroll.
Barry has a hard head. You cannot get through to him. He is the biggest booster of more roads out west, not able to make the link that wider roads and transportation in outer areas actually causes sprawl. He is too rigid. His thinking is so short ranged, I am surprised he can make it to the kitchen before he is hungry.
White is hot and cold. He can be a very good advocate on an issue and they he blurts out a totally NIMBY statement, losing his credibility. He needs to listen to those who can help guide him. His refusal to open his mind to learn makes him a useful tool of Joe Martinez who can pick out what he wants from Barry's ramblings and claim environmentalists support this when it is only Barry doing his half right thing. Does anyone in his group actually monitor what he is doing half the time?
4-lane White. He is not predictable so he is actually a rogue activist working as often for developers (unwittingly) as against them (purposely).
Confusion Say:
Better to have no opinion then one that can hinder the other half of a good opinion.
Very powerful observations -
Barry doesn't need to be the fox in our hen house.
What a bunch of whiners. Do you get up and speak at commission meetings? Do you put your money where your mouth is and actually become party to lawsuits against Lowes?
I know the guy and, sure he can have foot-in-mouth disease with some NIMBY comments every now and again, but someone please tell me what is off about this letter? He's saying there's no demonstrable need, this is a threat to agriculture, it is untimely, and there isn't road capacity.
What am I missing and where are you when it counts?
Barry White is quite an unique individual. Barry is motivated to make his neighborhood the best it can be. Understanding the dynamics of all components of local government can be a challenge. Barry knows the
system is broken and he wants to fix it. Unfortunately,to my knowledge there is no conspectus titled "Grassroot Activism in Miami-Dade County.A student of good government is required to search out a gaggle of seasoned expert in a multitude of fields. Many times these people will have competing and conflicting views,opinions,and interests. Barry is compelled to act. He realizes that problems do not rectify themselves. Barry chose to standup on many fronts.
The inactivity of the many leads to overwhelming the few. Do I agree with Barry on every issue ? No. Is Barry always on my side in ever battle? Does he always utilize the type strategy I agree with? No.
Barry is Hell bent on making this the best possible
community. I believe his motives are pure and intentions are honest. To insinuate that Barry is plant of the developers is totally of base. I am sure he neither needs or wants money from developers.
Although I do not always agree with him, I count him as a friend.
It is not about the letter...
I think folks are referring to the fact he needs to listen more and talk less... he is a newbie at what he is doing.
How can he be effective at activism or life is he is not listening and learning the rules of the road? He really is waltzing into issues that he doesn't grasp.
I know him, too. And he has always been polite. I would rather believe that he is naive about people and he just doesn't understand what he is promoting. Those things make him dangerous and a loose cannon.
Barry just needs to step back and really learn about planning and sprawl before promoting it. I don't think that anyone thinks he is evil.
Last writer - yes you have summed up Barry. Wonderful man, very polite but sometimes he doesn't see the forest only the trees. Expanding roads might help traffic in the short run but it invites sprawl in the long term.
Barry White opposed the incorporation of the Falls,Palmetto Bay,East Kendall, and any other incorporation for that matter. Mr White cannot figure out why the incorporation of Pinecrest,Palmetto Bay, and Cutler Bay worked and provided it's citizens with control over local zoning and a better quality of life as opposed to when Miami-Dade County provided municipal services to those areas.
We all have our opinions about incorporation. I have been on both sides. I still sign Miami instead of my city. In fact, I am much more likely to ignore issues now rather than stand up for my rights/interests, because in a city, it's harder to overcome the "clique" and bullying that occurs in small towns.
Sad to say, county government was more responsive because the bullying and inside friends were more spread out. If you speak in front of the commissioners or check staff about an issue, it is less likely that you will have retaliation or comments made by your neighbors, not to mention staff and your elected officials.
Barry is the type of activist that is dangerous, even to his own cause. Sure his letter is good but he erases all the good by advocating dragging 836 outside the UDB. He bristles when confronted with the illogic of his positions. He thinks he can overcome the downside by "fixing the UDB". He seems oblivious to the fact that the county commissioners would love to fix the UDB at Krome Avenue thus eliminating half of our farmland. He has no institutional memory and does not realize that many before him have fought to maintain the integrity of the UDB only to lose by a thousand paper cuts. In the meantime he offers hope to the commissioners who would love to see farmland in subdivisions.
last anon:
point taken. you are correct. 100%
WLRN is a joke. Very little local substance. But what do you expect from the Miami Dade County School system who owns and operates WLRN.
Post a Comment