Here's a good article from the UK Independent:
Johann Hari: Republicans, religion and the triumph of unreason
How do they train themselves to be so impervious to reality?
Wednesday, 19 August 2009
Sarah Palin really has claimed with a straight face that Barack Obama wants to kill her baby.
Something strange has happened in America in the nine months since Barack Obama was elected. It has best been summarised by the comedian Bill Maher: "The Democrats have moved to the right, and the Republicans have moved to a mental hospital."
The election of Obama – a black man with an anti-conservative message – as a successor to George W. Bush has scrambled the core American right's view of their country. In their gut, they saw the US as a white-skinned, right-wing nation forever shaped like Sarah Palin.
When this image was repudiated by a majority of Americans in a massive landslide, it simply didn't compute. How could this have happened? How could the cry of "Drill, baby, drill" have been beaten by a supposedly big government black guy? So a streak that has always been there in the American right's world-view – to deny reality, and argue against a demonic phantasm of their own creation – has swollen. Now it is all they can see.
Since Obama's rise, the US right has been skipping frantically from one fantasy to another, like a person in the throes of a mental breakdown. It started when they claimed he was a secret Muslim, and – at the same time – that he was a member of a black nationalist church that hated white people. Then, once these arguments were rejected and Obama won, they began to argue that he was born in Kenya and secretly smuggled into the United States as a baby, and the Hawaiian authorities conspired to fake his US birth certificate. So he is ineligible to rule and the office of President should pass to... the Republican runner-up, John McCain.
These aren't fringe phenomena: a Research 200 poll found that a majority of Republicans and Southerners say Obama wasn't born in the US, or aren't sure. A steady steam of Republican congressmen have been jabbering that Obama has "questions to answer". No amount of hard evidence – here's his birth certificate, here's a picture of his mother heavily pregnant in Hawaii, here's the announcement of his birth in the local Hawaiian paper – can pierce this conviction.
This trend has reached its apotheosis this summer with the Republican Party now claiming en masse that Obama wants to set up "death panels" to euthanise the old and disabled. Yes: Sarah Palin really has claimed – with a straight face – that Barack Obama wants to kill her baby.
You have to admire the audacity of the right. Here's what's actually happening. The US is the only major industrialised country that does not provide regular healthcare to all its citizens. Instead, they are required to provide for themselves – and 50 million people can't afford the insurance. As a result, 18,000 US citizens die every year needlessly, because they can't access the care they require. That's equivalent to six 9/11s, every year, year on year. Yet the Republicans have accused the Democrats who are trying to stop all this death by extending healthcare of being "killers" – and they have successfully managed to put them on the defensive.
The Republicans want to defend the existing system, not least because they are given massive sums of money by the private medical firms who benefit from the deadly status quo. But they can't do so honestly: some 70 per cent of Americans say it is "immoral" to retain a medical system that doesn't cover all citizens. So they have to invent lies to make any life-saving extension of healthcare sound depraved.
A few months ago, a recent board member for several private health corporations called Betsy McCaughey reportedly noticed a clause in the proposed healthcare legislation that would pay for old people to see a doctor and write a living will. They could stipulate when (if at all) they would like care to be withdrawn. It's totally voluntary. Many people want it: I know I wouldn't want to be kept alive for a few extra months if I was only going to be in agony and unable to speak. But McCaughey started the rumour that this was a form of euthanasia, where old people would be forced to agree to death. This was then stretched to include the disabled, like Palin's youngest child, who she claimed would have to "justify" his existence. It was flatly untrue – but the right had their talking-point, Palin declared the non-existent proposals "downright evil", and they were off.
It's been amazingly successful. Now, every conversation about healthcare has to begin with a Democrat explaining at great length that, no, they are not in favour of killing the elderly – while Republicans get away with defending a status quo that kills 18,000 people a year. The hypocrisy was startling: when Sarah Palin was Governor of Alaska, she encouraged citizens there to take out living wills. Almost all the Republicans leading the charge against "death panels" have voted for living wills in the past. But the lie has done its work: a confetti of distractions has been thrown up, and support is leaking away from the plan that would save lives.
These increasingly frenzied claims have become so detached from reality that they often seem like black comedy. The right-wing magazine US Investors' Daily claimed that if Stephen Hawking had been British, he would have been allowed to die at birth by its "socialist" healthcare system. Hawking responded with a polite cough that he is British, and "I wouldn't be here without the NHS".
This tendency to simply deny inconvenient facts and invent a fantasy world isn't new; it's only becoming more heightened. It ran through the Bush years like a dash of bourbon in water. When it became clear that Saddam Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction, the US right simply claimed they had been shipped to Syria. When the scientific evidence for man-made global warming became unanswerable, they claimed – as one Republican congressman put it – that it was "the greatest hoax in human history", and that all the world's climatologists were "liars". The American media then presents itself as an umpire between "the rival sides", as if they both had evidence behind them.
It's a shame, because there are some areas in which a conservative philosophy – reminding us of the limits of grand human schemes, and advising caution – could be a useful corrective. But that's not what these so-called "conservatives" are providing: instead, they are pumping up a hysterical fantasy that serves as a thin skin covering some raw economic interests and base prejudices.
For many of the people at the top of the party, this is merely cynical manipulation. One of Bush's former advisers, David Kuo, has said the President and Karl Rove would mock evangelicals as "nuts" as soon as they left the Oval Office. But the ordinary Republican base believe this stuff. They are being tricked into opposing their own interests through false fears and invented demons. Last week, one of the Republicans sent to disrupt a healthcare town hall started a fight and was injured – and then complained he had no health insurance. I didn't laugh; I wanted to weep.
How do they train themselves to be so impervious to reality? It begins, I suspect, with religion. They are taught from a young age that it is good to have "faith" – which is, by definition, a belief without any evidence to back it up. You don't have "faith" that Australia exists, or that fire burns: you have evidence. You only need "faith" to believe the untrue or unprovable. Indeed, they are taught that faith is the highest aspiration and most noble cause. Is it any surprise this then percolates into their political views? Faith-based thinking spreads and contaminates the rational.
Up to now, Obama has not responded well to this onslaught of unreason. He has had a two-pronged strategy: conciliate the elite economic interests, and joke about the fanatical fringe they are stirring up. He has (shamefully) assured the pharmaceutical companies that an expanded healthcare system will not use the power of government as a purchaser to bargain down drug prices, while wryly saying in public that he "doesn't want to kill Grandma". Rather than challenging these hard interests and bizarre fantasies aggressively, he has tried to flatter and soothe them.
This kind of mania can't be co-opted: it can only be overruled. Sometimes in politics you will have enemies, and they must be democratically defeated. The political system cannot be gummed up by a need to reach out to the maddest people or the greediest constituencies. There is no way to expand healthcare without angering Big Pharma and the Republicaloons. So be it. As Arianna Huffington put it, "It is as though, at the height of the civil rights movement, you thought you had to bring together Martin Luther King and George Wallace and make them agree. It's not how change happens."
However strange it seems, the Republican Party really is spinning off into a bizarre cult who believe Barack Obama is a baby-killer plotting to build death panels for the grannies of America. Their new slogan could be – shrill, baby, shrill.
6 comments:
I disagree with the writer on some points. I'm not a fan of Huffington or Palin.
One of the points is "50 million uninsured". Okay, show me where she got this number and show me how many of those are "Americans" legally in this country. I’m always annoyed when someone cannot explain where they get numbers from, so it’s universal for me at least.
I think the Medicare system could work, without reading every day how someone in Miami scammed them -again.
As someone who is self employed, my taxes go to the pyramid scheme of Social Security and Medicare. My CPA has flat out told me, don't expect much when (and if I ever could) retire.
So, do you really think it's a good idea to have the Government run health care? I hated my insurance company more than most so I can be counted in the "healthy" but uninsured category.
The solution is within the people of this Country, not with the Government. Once Big Brother is out of the debate, a solution could be found.
Last Anon, look at Canada! See what they do under "Public" healthcare! And that is why those who can afford it come here!
Socialists always know better (not)!
As a person that has lived in Canada and even had a child there, I would have to disagree with a couple of the response statements above. No healthcare system is perfect, but most like to save money when they can.
When you have a child in Canada, a nurse comes for a house call when you get settled in with the new baby. They check the weight and height and give the baby the once over to make sure there are no problems. A new mother can ask any questions or concerns with the nurse. It was a nice short visit and I greatly appreciated it, as did my husband.
Now here's how it went down with the second one in the US. When we went home, no one offered to come. We were told to come to the pediatrician's office in a week. The office was filled with coughing, runny nosed kids of all shapes and sizes, of which we had to sit and share air and furniture and germs for the minimal one hour wait with a brand new baby. Then, a nurse and a doctor checked my child and no one really asked how things were going on in the home. Just an in and out process.
Now call me crazy or a socialist or a nazi or whatever you want, but you know, I really preferred the nurse visit. It was more personal with no wait time and no germy kids running around. And how much cheaper is a nurse visit then a schlept into an office (rent) to see a receptionist, a nurse and a doctor and end up with a sick baby because of the germs that we were exposed to?
I'm not saying that the Canadian Healthcare system is perfect, but one thing is for sure. They are "people centred". HMO's are "profit centered". And wait time? I had to wait 4 months to get an appointment with a doctor in Miami, 8 to get the operation, and an average 2 to 4 hours in a waiting room each time I made an appointment. I have never heard of anything like that in Canada!
Oh, and just one more thing. Canada has some of the finest research hospitals in the world.
The other M
The other moving part to consider within this vast, broken system is the flappy, hollow, ineffectual physical therapy industry. PT has become a scam where fewer hours of quality work are being put in and ballooning expenses r being paid with no measurable results per patient. If that piece of this national health situation functioned correctly, then the population's general health levels and those of the chronically ill would not be repeatedly flooding the system and using more resources. Modern medicine is busted from the foundation upwards, Insurance Companies know this. They also know how sick the country's population is, riddled with Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome, Vitamin Deficiencies and Heavy Metals poisoning. Truthfully, we the people do not have to go fix the current system that is charged with treating the symptoms created by the causes listed above, we need to address the root causes first, then build a system of health care that has a chance of sustainable success.
I've seen this mentality at work with my own eyes. it's scary, it's sick - guns, god and big businesss.
What I can't justify is Sarah Palin's philosophy regarding the environment (what does it matter when the Rapture is close at hand) and her reliance on the our abysmal healthcare systen to protect her son.
I, too, have a handicapped son and think our healthcare staus quo is woeful, particularly in this state.
I would trust my son's life more in the hands of man who obviously seems cherish his to a woman who placed her own ambtion over the welfare of hers.
I started reading the post from the mother that gave birth in both Canada and the US and realized, hey, I wrote that! As a continuation to that post:
My firstborn now lives in Vancouver. While many young adults go without health insurance in the US because of the price, it is such a wonderful feeling when your newly adult child calls and says she is sick, and you are able to advise her to "Go to the doctor" without the worry of how she will be able to pay. Peace of mind, that's what Universal Healthcare provides.
The other M
Post a Comment