News that Gonzalo Sanabria was running for Coral Gables City Commission summoned memories of meetings of the county planning advisory board where Sanabria served as the pro-development vote collector for many years. As a citizen who attended many Planning Advisory Board meetings having to do with the Urban Development Boundary, I had first-hand experience how votes are tallied by applicants for development long before citizens ever stand up to the microphone to state their point of view. (please click, 'read more')
The stock scripts--like Sanabria's-- are so familiar, base, and worked out beforehand; that even newspaper reporters wonder what the fuss is all about. Hasn't it all happened before? What's the big deal? Every point is vetted by land use lawyers cozy with planning board members who will vote like Sanabria to move the Urban Development Boundary, defaulting to positions that might be useful in subsequent court cases, etc. etc.
The vote on Florida City Commons for instance, outside the Urban Development Boundary, in 2003 is exactly to the point. In the Miami Herald, Sanabria--now candidate for Coral Gables City Commission--defended his vote saying, "The environmental protections were there."
Bull. The Hold The Line Campaign, coalescing more than 150 business, community, civic and environmental groups, formed exactly because environmental protections for wetlands outside the UDB are NOT there. In the case of Florida City Commons-- a Lennar development that died on the vine but would have put more than 6,000 homes in Biscayne Bay wetlands-- the scam included the county surrendering control of future permitting to Florida City, whose weak commitment to environmental rules doesn't need explanation, only a drive through the area.
The entire history of development in south Florida is riddled with massive development projects seeking ways around environmental laws and, mostly, succeeding. That's the logic that Sanabria represents.
Because of the backroom dealing, I assumed Sanabria was making an opportunistic run at the Coral Gables City Commission for reasons that are obscure. Since that time, news that Sanabria has never even voted in a Coral Gables municipal election bears out that point of view. Joe Rasco made a run at Coral Gables city manager. Reportedly, Sanabria is gathering support from interests who wanted Rasco, one of the county development insiders, in that position. For some unstated reason, Republican office holders in the state legislature are also mounting a campaign in Sanabria's defense despite the fact the election is non-partisan.
So what does Gonzolo Sanabria really want?
Insider politics in Miami-Dade are invisible to the public. The pushing and pulling for influence and power never makes it to the pages of the daily newspaper. (Jim Defede was the last journalist to consistently report out those politics and he did it, not for the Herald, but earlier for Miami New Times.)
You don't have to be clairvoyant to see that even in the most lackluster economy since the Depression, that the lobby for development--as represented by Sanabria and his campaign manager, Armando Guttierez --are always looking for an edge; always looking for compliant public officials willing to carry out their zoning and permitting requests. As a former chair of the Latin Builders Association, Sanabria certainly was a full participant in the winding of the inner clockspring of government.
Most people wouldn't think much of failing to vote in a municipal election or blowing through a manatee protection zone (as Sanabria was apprehended, doing); but when that person is running for a public office, the underlying motives of deserve to be clarified. Uniquely among Miami-Dade municipalities, Coral Gables has advanced zoning and planning codes that are more visionary and restrictive of insiders who use the rules (or not) to break the rules to generate incremental profit from what is originally permitted or allowed. They help elect candidates who will be faithful to the principle that governmental processes exist to be gummed up. It's not hard work and it is done all the time.
It is really too bad that well-meaning people have fallen for the clap trap, but there it is. Hopefully Coral Gables voters will have reasoned through what is at stake in next week's municipal election and understand that Sanabria, who never voted in a Coral Gables municipal election, should not be voted for, in this one.
4 comments:
How can I possibility vote for a smuck that can't even find his own way to the poll unless it is to vote in his own interest???
Everything that Genius is saying is true.
The developers and almost all the board members, politicians (not just the county commissioners, there are politicians on the 29th floor as well as the cities) are cozy with the developers and their attorneys. It has gotten to where they don't even bother to be subtle about it. It is very sad to see the arrogance and over-confidence in those people. They all KNOW the outcome before the hearing and they are just tolerating the nuisance of public hearings.
The public hearing process is a mockery of the people who are affected by zoning decisions.
Why on would anyone living here in Coral Gables sanction and support anyone who has shown, without a doubt, that they support a corrupt process?
Why support a person who doesn’t even bother to vote in elections himself, which tells me that he is not big on the democratic process to start with and that is scary.
Gimlette and Genius.. please.. make sure you come out with some news in the next few days. I know that people are reading your posts and everyone's comments. And, it helps for people to really know who Sanabria is. He is no good for Coral Gables... or in general, really. I am glad that Commissioner Anderson keeps fighting against him. Also.. check out the coral gables gazette.. and see how pople really feel about Sanabria. Wheww.. he does have some frenemies out there.
Gonzo Sanavi is my buddy and got me a lot of lucrative contracts in order to milk a lot of tax payer dollars
Post a Comment