If our economic crisis were a baseball contest, we are two or three innings into the game with a long way to go. We will never see anything, again, like this in our lifetimes.
I hope the game resolves to the side of fiscal accountability, without destroying most of the wealth of the United States. We are living through the greatest gamble in US economic history: that homes and real estate can substitute for asset creation based on diversified sectors of manufacturing and technology.
I am dead-set against bailing out corrupt finance-- from lenders, to insurers, to builders and the whole web of county commissioner majorities, state and federal legislatures that became rich and powerful and now struggles to survive under the weight of toxic debt measured in the trillions.
Here's the problem: once you start bailing out banks, insurance companies, and--yes-- homeowners who either gambled badly or invested unwisely or used their homes as piggy banks or were otherwise sucked into the frenzy, once you start saving Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, you cannot stop. The better point is: where would you stop?
Do you just bail out your friends at Countrywide, or US Century, or the lobbyists turned rock miners? Or do you also bailout every homeowner sold a toxic ARM, whether the loan docs were fraudulent or not?
Breaking contracts, which is the essential feature of a bailout, and putting the US taxpayer in the place of shouldering the consequences will crush the US dollar; a value that is only worth what an investor-- in this case, foreign investors-- are willing to pay for it. It has not been good news, so far.
What we are in the midst of, is not just an oil shock-although gasoline and energy prices are certainly the most immediate and visible impact to ordinary Americans. What we are in the midst of, is not just a global competition for commodities-although our own splendid patterns of consumption have put bedrock industries, like Detroit and GM, on the threshold of Chapter 11.
We are in the midst of an economic crisis we have not seen the likes of, since the Great Depression: brought on by Wall Street, land speculators, production home builders, their spin masters and shills and the whole supply chain including Congress and the White House that abandoned fiscal conservatism and sound management of the economy.
They are fighting like mad to keep up appearances.
A year ago, I spent an afternoon on the Miami Dade court house steps, watching foreclosure proceedings in which loan originators and owners-- mostly large financial institutions like Deutche Bank-- bought back titles for a song. It was a scenario playing out across the nation. Only very few people were paying attention how it was playing.
Even then, it was only a question of time when federal regulators would require the banks to mark those assets to market: in other words, at a value a buyer could be found. Apparently, it is starting to happen now.
So here we have the problem with the US economy: it is like a swimming pool filter clogged with gunk and debris. The only way to get clean water flowing again is to flush out the system, according to the law of contracts and of supply and demand. There is no way around it.
In the post below by Geniusofdespair, what jumped out was one lender, Indymac.
In a recent letter posted on its website, Indymac writes:
"In light of the current environment and related deterioration of our financial position since last quarter, we have been working closely with our federal banking regulators with respect to the actions that they and we must take to meet our mutual goal of keeping Indymac safe and sound through this crisis period. In that respect, based on information we have provided to our regulators, they have advised us that we are no longer “well capitalized”, which we stated on May 12 was a possible scenario. Our regulators have also asked us to submit to them a new business plan for their review and approval, something on which we have been working with them for some time. We have agreed on the basic elements of the plan, and the regulators have directed us to begin executing on it. An important element of our plan is to improve our capital ratios. Without an external capital raise, the traditional way to improve safety and soundness is to sell assets and shrink the balance sheet, which in normal times generally has the effect of improving capital ratios and bolstering liquidity. Yet in this environment, where either there are no bids for most of IMB’s mortgage loans and securities or the bid/ask spreads are abnormally wide, “fire-selling” assets would actually deplete capital further. As a result, the most realistic and cost-effective way to shrink both our balance sheet and our servicing rights asset (which, as discussed in previous communications, is up against the regulatory cap limit), is to curtail most new loan production.
In addition to needing to shrink our assets to improve our capital ratios, we also need to do so to ensure that we maintain prudent operating liquidity. A consequence of falling below well-capitalized is that we are no longer permitted to accept new brokered deposits or renew or roll over existing ones, unless we get a waiver from the FDIC. While we have submitted a waiver application, it is uncertain as to whether such a waiver will be granted."
"No longer well capitalized" is the phrase that precedes the instruction by regulators to lay the bank's head on the chopping block. "A waiver" means a plea to not to carry through with the execution.
But I don't see a way out for Indymac or the rest. I don't see a way to get the water running clear again until taxpayers and investors are confident that the principles of fiduciary responsibility and accountabiity have been restored both to the private sector and to government.
On this last note, American voters are due a clear reckoning by the candidates to be president of the economic crisis. From their point of view, of Obama and McCain, their problem is parsing how much truth the American voter can stand. So far, not so good.
This is the problem with lies and deception: it is not so easy to stop especially when the economy is in the midst of a trillion dollar meltdown.
11 comments:
"I hope the game resolves to the side of fiscal accountability, without destroying most of the wealth of the United States."
Thanks Chavez. Nice Statement.
moderate
I investigated just one of the many bad deals. A seller goes to his broker and says I want to sell my real estate for $200,000. The broker says OK. Soon the seller is told that there is a buyer. BUT in order to get his $200,000 he must make the deal for $250,000 and let the buyer get the excess $50,000 back. The seller only wants to sell and get his money and he knows the property may not even be worth the $200.000 he wanted so he says sure.
The broker tells the buyer who has no money at all that he has a deal.
The broker then contacts the mortgage broker who probably does not care what the real facts are because he will just turn over the completed deal to a bank. He sends his appraiser in who kindly appraises the property which is really not even worth $200,000 for the full $250,000. At the title company the money goes to the real estate broker who gives $200,000 to the seller and shows that the buyer put up $50,000. for the deal. This make the entire deal sound proper and some bank will buy it. The buyer now has a mortgage for $250,000 and if something goes wrong in the future and he cannot pay both he and the bank will lose, but the real estate broker and the mortgage broker come out very well.
That is exactly what happened in one case except the amounts have been changed to protect my informant.
I do not think it is right to protect the buyer or the brokers.
Of course what do I know, they may be protected by lobbyists.
Seems a gratuitous comment about Chavez. Gimleteye is arguing against socializing the toxic debt and for responsible parties to be held fiscally accountable to contracts and law. But the Federal Reserve has already taken steps to "nationalize" the banking crisis, in guaranteeing toxic debt held by financial institutions as collateral against loans. Gimleteye is arguing the opposite position. So what's your point?
I read his comment wrong.
Amazingly, I am in agreement with him on this issue.
moderate
So what's your point?
If you read this blog with any regularity, you know that "moderate" is not the brightest bulb on the tree.
your mother thinks I'm smart
moderate
See what I mean.
Wow, liberal democrats are bailing out the banks, led by Chris Dodd who got the special Countrywide loans. Where are you bloggers on that one?
Gimleteye writes:
Read our archive, 'housing crash', to see what we've written about this issue.
It is not a trillion dollar meltdown, it is a multitrillion dollar breakdown.
Unless a whole bunch of oil comes on line, which saved Reagan, or the web/PCs development which saved Clinton, Keynesian borrowing and spending is not going to save us now.
Look o Florida 1926-1928 for the future.
great. It all stinks. Indymac today, and Fannie and Freddy next?
I have to hit the IRA next week. This nonsense is affecting my life.
Post a Comment