As Americans become more urbanized, and especially more bound indoors by the internet, it is harder to persuade people to invest in time spent outdoors-- recreating or in the wilderness, hunting or fishing or bird watching. That was a story on NBC Nightly News a few days ago, but it has to be familiar to anyone who has ever considered why it is so hard for Miami-Dade County and Miami's cities to protect wetlands, water quality, beaches, and the Everglades.
These "amenities" are losing constituents at a time that constituents for the environment are more important than ever. (It is great news to hear about the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation giving $200 million to the arts, as in this AM's paper, but has the foundation ever given a dollar to the Everglades? Not a cent.)
On the other side of the environment are lobbyists like Ron Book, who represents the City of Bal Harbor and Miami Dade County, among a long list of clients whose main concern about the environment is that it doesn't screw up their development plans.
So it was heartening to read that 200 surfers showed up on the causeway over Haulover Inlet last Saturday, protesting the failure of Miami Dade County to require that the City of Bal Harbor provide required public access to the beaches surfers use immediately to the south of the jetty.
That is more people than any south Florida environmental group has been able to muster at a rally lately. (Most groups are pinned down in what one observer trenchantly called, the "environmental industrial complex".)
I hope the surfers and their organization, Surfrider Foundation, keep up the protests. For more on the issue, read on:
In 2004, at the height of the housing bubble and construction bubble, the City of Bal Harbor allowed one of the prime institgators of overdevelopment in Florida, WCI Communities -- a company whose chairman, Al Hoffman, had been finance chair of both Jeb Bush and George W. Bush political campaigns-- to commandeer the only public parking lot providing access to the surfer's beach.
That was four years ago.
To allow another condo complex to rise, the City of Bal Harbor and local police began to push citizens off the parking lot, preventing surfers from accessing the beach. There are innumerable cases where surfers' vehicles were ticketed heavily while construction trade vehicles and their work products were allowed to indefinitely park on the site without penalty.
Miami Dade Department of Environmental Protection (DERM) is falling down on the job. Now DERM would say, look-- we have to weigh priorities, we have billions of dollars in environmental initiatives we have to monitor and you're bringing me the problem of a parking lot: which is more important?
But the devil is always in the details, and in this particular case, the absence of attention by DERM shows that it is truly an agency that cares more about servicing the development industry than the taxpayers who fund its operations.
The Village Council of Bal Harbor is a disaster: its employees have colluded with the developer and against the issue of preserving beach access even through a construction period. WCI? One of the main villains in the housing market implosion in Florida, and, nationally by extension of its (former) political influence.
It turns out that guaranteeing public access to the beach is also a requirement of federal law, applying to beach renourishment projects that are the lifeblood of tourism and real estate throughout the beaches area.
In other words, the City of Bal Harbor--and likely Miami Dade County--is breaking the law.
But citizens pay the price: for parking, for unfunded infrastructure, for a building boom that made a few WCI executives rich and tossed the company in the salad-bowl of insolvency.
The bottom line: what Bal Harbor is doing, sucks. Congratulations for the surfers for becoming activists and recognize that it is going to take a whole lot more protesting to tip the pendulum anything close to the promise of democracy: use it, or lose it.
13 comments:
Windsurfers had a lot of dealings with Surfrider -- they are a great group, guardians of the public's beach access and they even did beach water testing when they were helping us.
Nice video, it reminded me of the time when we protested the closing of Virginia Key beach by the City of Miami (budget crunch). We circled around City Hall with our sails rigged. Did you know that the City of Miami has only one beach, Virginia Key? When people think about Miami they think about beaches but there are none except VK. The City has developed all it's waterfront land. There is the Causeway, run by the county -- however call the City Police. Figure that out.
As the Chairman of Surfrider Foundation in South Florida, I could not have written a more accurate summation of the issues the public faces with Bal Harbor and WCI. The writer is “spot on” with the points made, and these are the very reasons we held the protest this past Saturday. Well done.
Surfrider Foundation is a grassroots organization committed to protecting our oceans, beaches and waves. Though much of our work involves beach cleanups, dune restorations, water testing, education and awareness, one of the rights we work tirelessly to protect is beach access. That right is becoming more and more difficult to protect in South Florida with the onslaught of beachfront development.
Miami-Dade relies heavily on tourism and requires a vibrant community to keep our status as a world-class destination. Every time we turn our heads to environmental issues regarding our beaches and waterways, we slowly lose that status. Every time we look the other way when govt. officials and big business make decisions that adversely affect the people who make our area great, we lose even more. Beach access is your right. Clean, healthy beaches and waterway should be as well.
I urge everyone who reads this post to take a long, hard look at where our community is going. Picture what the landscape of Miami-Dade will look like in 20 years. Will we make the right choices now and protect what we hand over to the next generation? Or will we continue to fall down in the ranks of “what was” and “what could have been.”
Sincerely,
Shane Close
Chairman
Surfrider Foundation
South Florida
www.surfrider.org/southflorida
It's nice to see that a good perspective & knowledgeable person has taken the time to present the right info & shine the light for the blind
As a resident of Miami Beach, I am glad that there are at least a few public access points to the beach. In other parts of the state, miles of beach are closed off to the public by private residences. And then those same private interests scream for our federal and state tax dollars to dredge and fill their beach with sand.
I know that hundreds of millions of dollars of our tax money is spent to 'shore up' Miami's beaches, and so I am offended when one private company takes away my right to get to the beach. To the south of Haulover Inlet all of the parking spots were taken by construction workers and trucks delivering materials. Then when I tried to get to the beach (after parking in what I thought was a legal spot), the wind pushed the chainlink and tarp fence against me, leaving no room between it and sea wall. I had to step over nails, trash left by workers, wooden posts - not what I would ever describe as open access.
I plead for FDOT to take away the lease that WCI has over the public parking lot, and that Bal Harbour enforces the safety codes for construction along its shores. If nothing is done, I foresee more protests ahead since the Surfrider Foundation is committed to protecting the public's right to open beach access.
I don't like preaching to the choir, I prefer a good hard nosed debate with the opposition but it is encouraging to see the response to Surfrider's actions. It is disheartning to see they way the County and the Village have looked the other way, especially as $300,000 was illeagally passed between the Village and the developer. Bal Harbour, when asked by the press at the Bridge Demonstration, said it was for lost parking revenue. Well there you go Miami-Dade County, that's allot of revenue, think you could use that now that the property tax referendum passed?
Crazy thing is that Surfrider has bigger, more important battles to fight, like water quality/sewage treatment(or lack there of), dumping by gambling/cruise ships, reef protection, global warming effects, coastal habitat loss, but NOOOOoo we have to expend resources to fight illegal beach closings. What is our government doing to protect us-invade Iraq?
The spider's web of government where it seems impossible to get the voice to ear's that listen has been given a couple of snips. The Rock the Bridge 08 protest goes down as just a starting point of awareness being voiced loud and clear from the roar of just a hundred. Next will be the demands from many more as this issue will not just die and go away, i personally won't let it. Kudos to the Surfrider Foundation and the people in the community that made a stand and will continue to do so until we, as the people of this community, this beach and this state see change!
I am a Miami native. This will be the second development boom that I have witnessed in my thirty-six years. Both development crazes were very similar in that, developers made hordes of money, little to no interest was taken in preserving environmental integrity or quality of life and when the dust settled, the 'locals' were left with collapsing economies, tax burdens, crime and a surplus of unoccupied property.
Public beach access is a very important issue and one that is constantly threatened and at risk. However, this problem is more of a troublesome side effect to the raping and pillaging of South Florida's resources by developers and politicians that has gone on for too long.
The Surfrider Foundation's protest on 'Ground Hog's' Day was an amazing display, but I fear that it is really just a small voice in a rather large vaccum. I applaud the efforts of all those involved. I was in attendance myself. It was a great feeling to be part of something so important.
However, Florida is under threat every single day by uncontrolled sprawl and development, ill conceived urban planning and huge taxation on our natural resources. I would urge everyone to get involved. If not with public beach access, with any number of environmental and civil travesties that happen on a daily basis. Otherwise, all the reasons that attracted you to this stunning and incredible little spot on the globe will be compromised and will result in a lost paradise.
Think, act, vote. Don't let the rug be swept out from underneath you!
I imagine the sleazy lobbyist Ron Book hiding in the tall grass (probably man-made) using his sniper rifle to pick off pesky surfers.
Great follow-up article in the Sunpost regarding the Surfrider protest from Ground Hog Day. Surfrider is in the process of drafting an ethics complaint against Bal Harbour Village Manager Alfred Treppeda for using lobbyist Ron Book's name in order to curry favor with FDOT.
Surfrider has done extensive public record requests and has the certified letters and emails to show Manager Treppeda knew that it was illegal to close the beach access parking under the bridge and give it to WCI for exclusive use.
If something sleazy and maybe even illegal is happening then most likely Ron Book is involved.
I am so proud to be a participant in this life with Surfrider by my side.
As a natural lover, surfer, kiteboarder, environmentalist, and outdoor enthusiast. It is terrific to see motivated individuals voicing discontent at larger groups that not only impact the (lawful) beach goers personal experience but those who degrade our environment. The greatest part of this whole experience is that surfrider and surfers are now dealing with an issue that potentially effects all beach goers. We are on to something. As Margaret Mead said; "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it's the only thing that ever has."
that is supposed to say nature lover
- Ian
Post a Comment