Monday, July 02, 2007

Niesen Kasdin and Dan Ricker, polar opposites by gimleteye

Someone please open the windows.

Niesen Kasdin did not "preside over Miami Beach during its remarkable revitalization", as he writes in today's Miami Herald.

Kasdin is a lobbyist for developers. As a former mayor of Miami Beach, he was in the right place at the right time when entrepreneurs and activists with vision grasped the historical and cultural attractiveness of the Art Deco District.

Which leads me to the Ricker Report, by Dan Ricker. Give Dan credit: in his own way, the Watchdog Report, he’s trying to open the windows in Miami and Miami-Dade.

Dan writes: “In a community that spent $50 million over five-years fighting public corruption, and funded five community periodicals $20,000 each that did not exist, the Watchdog Report has survived on a gross income of $48,000, which is less than an entry position in the county’s transit department."

What Kasdin actually presided over was the failure to adequately protect South Beach from zoning changes and permitting that have taken years to materialize but now evidence in the way South Beach ressembles another taudry sea-side destination.

Dan Ricker doesn't focus much on the litany of problems that developers have created in Miami-Dade County. He does, though, offer occasional tidbits like one from this week's edition:

“… one representative of the building industry told the Watchdog Report that “what the state legislature did” by cutting property taxes is disproportionately impacting developers as municipalities try to offset the reduced revenue coming in after the property tax cuts and it was unfair. They noted the state leaders wanted to see waste and fat cut from the municipal budgets but the opposite in many ways is happening as cities study ways to increase fees to cover the funding shortfall rather than trim positions and services.”

Wasn't it Kasdin's clients from the building industry who primarily pushed the Republican legislature to “cut property taxes” in order to jump-start dead housing markets?

Now they are crying foul, because they got what they wanted? (All along, eyeonmiami has said that the Florida legislature and special session would deliver nada in terms of relief for builders now facing the worst collapse in housing since the 1920’s—mostly because of greed and avarice.)

Kasdin is way off-base in his assessment of downtown's budding roses. He's well paid to offer such well rounded views.

The Miami Herald owes its readers a counterpoint, in the interest of balance and fairness.

Dan, on the other hand, deserves financial support. If the Miami Herald believes enough in Dan to print his words occasionally, it should just hire him and provide a decent living wage.

Or maybe, lobbyists should be required to disclose all fees paid by clients and a tax levied on their gross income to be paid into a charitable foundation for award by an independent board comprised of citizens with no axe to grind, to be paid to community activists and independent (ie. no profit) news organizations like the Ricker Report.

After all, what activists in Miami-Dade County mostly do is gin up fees for lobbyists.

It’s a pretty damn lonely job Dan is doing. He writes, “There appears to be an urban myth that I have a trust fund, and it came up again at Thursday’s commission meeting when a long time friend and senior city executive told a reporter when she asked how I lived. He with a big grin on his face said I “had a trust fund.” In his case we will not be speaking in the future but as I have written before, as has been covered in multiple profiles of me in newspapers. I live off the community and money from residents that think having someone out in the community is important and it is an insult to me after a decade, for this to keep coming–up and is a major misconception the community has."

"When I first started watching government I planned to do this for only a short time, maybe six-months but as public institutions continued to unravel, scandals were coming from all directions, it seemed important to have someone in the field for the press does not cover all the thousands of public meetings held every year and it seemed someone needed to do it."

"Besides the decade of my life, I have also used all the personal money I had saved, about $425,000 over the years and that is no small contribution in my attempt to keep the public informed and it is for this reason. I bristle when some well paid government employee, with great health and retirement benefits makes a snarky comment because there is a big difference between feeling someone’s pain versus actually living it, and I hope some of my readers keep that in mind.”

In the last edition, Dan notes “As part of an ongoing public awareness initiative, Robert Meyers, Executive Director of the Ethics Commission, will appear on Topical Currents, WLRN 91.3FM, on July 16th from 1 PM-2 PM. He will discuss the issue of ethics in general, the work of the EIA Task Force and recent legislation that has empowered the Commission to review complaints from County employees who have blown the whistle on corruption and believe they have become targets of retaliation as a result. Mr. Meyers will be joined on the program by Elizabeth Hernandez, Coral Gables City Attorney and Chair of the EIA Task Force, and Watchdog Report publisher Daniel A. Ricker.”

Put it on your calendar and by all means, call-in: let Mr. Myers know what you feel about the effectiveness of the Miami-Dade County Ethics Commission and its multi-million dollar budget.

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

I have followed Dan's Watch Dog since the inception. He is a voice for exposure and for that very reason will never get County dollars. Any activist who exposes government wrong doing or stupidity will suffer consequences. Perhaps in the form of "code enforcement", public ridicule or, in Dan's case, lack of support for his periodical. I remember Commissioner Souto threatening a member of the public with whom he disagreed with code enforcement. He did it from the dais with impunity and immunity. Commissioners Seijas, Diaz, Martinez and Moss call activists liars, cheaters and worse. A county employee will never go public, that's career ending.
It's damn unfortunate that commissioners will now know the identity of whistle blowers. Little by little the government is tightening the noose around dissenters (such as making petition gathering impossible). I salute Dan Ricker and will continue to support his efforts but the county never will!

Anonymous said...

Neisan Kaisdan should have disclosed that as Mayor he was still taking on new clients who wanted to do business in the City of Miami Beach. Kasidan was forced to recuse himself over 70 times.

Now Kasidan, who built his political base with preservationists, represents developers who want to expand the UDB and who want to fill in the Everglades so they can expand the sprawl.

Perhaps Kaisdan, if he wants downtown cleaned up, can advocate for a new Downtown Development Authority and no insider deals?

Anonymous said...

Probably the Herald intended to give a "positive" side to the "negative" news about downtown Miami... but the newspaper still hasn't gotten to the heart of the problem: developers out of control. Where is the editorial clarifying that?

Anonymous said...

yes, he had about 65 conflicts of interest recrusals during his period of being Mayor. Could he have been a lobbyist at that time as well?

Emilio Dingo said...

How do you sign up to receive Ricker's reports?

When I follow Google to: http://www.watchdogreport.net
I get a "403 Forbidden" error.

When I follow the instructions in the Herald and send a request to danielricker@earthlink.net
I get an e-mail back saying that address doesn't exist...

--John S.

Anonymous said...

Watchdogreport1@earthlink.net

Anonymous said...

boy, O boy...I am not whispering a word about what I know at work. The commissioners will be checking that 'whistle blower list' with the intensity that Santa uses checking his list on Christmas eve.

Anonymous said...

Miami Herald Letter To Editor July 3, 2007

Desolate downtown

I'm not sure what sort of ''resurgence'' in downtown Miami Neisen Kasdin is talking about (Downtown Miami is alive again, July 2, Other Views). The area is dead after 6 p.m., just as it has been since the 1970s. The shopping is almost entirely for cheap luggage, cheap electronics and jewelry.

The Carnival Center for the Performing Arts is over budget and inhospitable to anyone arriving by car, the old Omni is still dead and the American Airlines Arena has helped to create a traffic nightmare on Biscayne Boulevard. There are no mini-parks in the area, and it is not pedestrian-friendly. The residential neighborhoods east of Biscayne Boulevard and south of the Julia Tuttle Causeway are being destroyed by high-rises.

As for the ''remarkable revitalization'' of Miami Beach that Kasdin says that he ''presided over,'' his term as mayor was marked by rampant high-rise overdevelopment, deals with developers, increased traffic gridlock, politically inspired street blockages, an increasingly dirty Washington Avenue and the expansion of a bloated city bureaucracy.

Kasdin was involved with so many companies and people dealing with the city that he had to recuse himself repeatedly from voting on issues.

Miami Beach

Anonymous said...

Wasn't Kasdin poking his nose into the Watershed Study and the water studies along old cutler?

Anonymous said...

Miami Herald Thu, Jul. 05, 2007

Clean up downtown

Re. June 2 story Macy's exec excoriates downtown:

Perhaps if Miami Mayor Manny Diaz and city commissioners gave up their bayfront views, moved their offices downtown and gazed upon a city in desperate need of immediate action, things would get done more quickly.

PETER R. EVANS, Miami

Anonymous said...

Surfside Mayor Charles Burkett and Vice Mayor Howard Weinberg want to give away or sell out all of Surfside's public functions. This mad rush to privatization has jacked up the Town budget to its highest levels in history. There are some issues festering. Is it just a coincidence that virtually ALL of the contracts are going to ONE single private firm?

Who has been getting contracts from the Town?

Planning and Zoning Services ……… Calvin Giordano and Associates
Community Development Services …. Calvin Giordano and Associates
Landscape Design Services …. Calvin Giordano and Associates
Community Center Project Services…. Calvin Giordano and Associates
Emergency Management Services …. Calvin Giordano and Associates
Town Web Site services …. Calvin Giordano and Associates
Municipal Engineering Services …. Calvin Giordano and Associates
Beach Walk Project Planning Services …. Calvin Giordano and Asssociates
Street and Roadway Services …. Calvin Giordano and Associates
Permit Process Services …. Calvin Giordano and Associates
Building Department Services …. Calvin Giordano and Associates
Code Enforcement Services …. Calvin Giordano and Associates

Soon the move to eliminate the Town’s own garbage and trash services will be pushed by town officials. Is that what RESIDENTS want, or is that just what my opponent wants? IS THERE SOMETHING WRONG HERE? Is everything about Surfside these days for sale? Do residents want to put public responsibilities into the hands of a private company? Why is Surfside now getting less service for more money?

Anonymous said...

Surfside residents and all citizens who care about government running wildly irresponsible and brazenly abusing public office, everyone can send this to public officials and media:

• We object to your intention to close the Surfside Library.
• We know that the cost of continuing the operation of the Library is far less than the cost of the Charette, the biggest waste of money in the town's history (thank you Ken Arnold - NOT)
• We know that the cost of "take home cars" is more than the cost of the Library.
• We know that the cost of in-house and outside attorneys is far more than the cost of the Library.
• We regret and object to the needless demolition of the Surfside Community Center without a vote of the people.
• We know and respect that the people of the Town have repeatedly rejected having the
Town go into debt of any kind.
• We know that elected town officials pay themselves with taxpayer money $500 per month plus "expenses" even though the Town Charter specifies that they will be paid only $1.00 per year.
• We know that despite any decrease in property values, the Town will actually receive 25% MORE total revenue next year than it did five years ago, and that while there is no actual budget crisis there is a spending crisis and a waste crisis.
• We know that the Town has paid millions of dollars to one single outside contractor
that has been given dozens of contracts mostly without any bids, and we know that town officials have made many transfers of town savings funds into town operating accounts just to keep their spending habits going. The town reserve has been siphoned.
• We know that town officials have refused the public pleas of town residents for a
forensic audit of town expenditures from 2006 – 2009.
• We object to the improper priorities of town officials and we petition for a reversal
of course on all of these items including the planned imminent closure of the Library.
• We urge all town officials to stop their ill conceived plans and to end the red ink spending, end the waste, and keep the library open.