I couldn't help noticing in Natacha Seijas' opinion piece (she reads the paper? I thought she only read our blog) in today's Miami Herald "County taking big steps on global warming", the following: "Rising sea levels must be countered to protect property and our drinking water supply."
Commissioner Seijas needs a little lecture on transgressions against our drinking water. As the rock miners' advocate, she is responsible for the cone of silence that descended over county government when it was discovered that benzene that causes cancer had infiltrated our drinking water supply in West Dade.
Only litigation by Sierra Club and a few other environmental groups brought to light the contamination that the county was obligated, by federal law, to disclose to residents at the time it occurred.
Does Natacha Seijas care about drinking water supply or water quality? What's a little cancer in your drinking water? I guess, as long as it's clear she'll drink it.
(I want to be clear about something here: I'm surrounded by friends and acquaintances who in middle age are getting prostate cancer... I'm sure you have your own stories.)
As to "rising sea levels must be countered to protect property": here, Seijas is consistent to the Latin Builders Association and others in the builder lobby, her power base.
Seijas needs another lecture: sea-level rise is coming and there are not enough billions in Miami-Dade taxpayers to build sea walls high enough to protect property owners. That is exactly the message insurance companies are telling South Florida businesses, with sky high rates.
The best thing Seijas could do, would be to lead the way in rejecting zoning changes and permits that allow more development in flood zones.
That would be the greenest action that Miami-Dade County could take, and if Seijas ever writes an opinion piece on THAT, I'll eat my Sunday hat.
What Michael Lewis, Miami Today publisher, left out of this week’s editorial, “Like a piƱata, bursting condo bubble will spill forth goodies”, could fill a book.
Mr. Lewis “serves Florida’s Most Important Audience” with the preternatural optimism of Colonel Tom Parker, who sold Elvis Presley as an icon of American values even as he abused cocaine and painkillers.
In his editorial this week, Mr. Lewis casts tiny barbs at the condo flippers who he warns now have to come to the table and close.
But Miami Today, during the housing boom—not just condos--, was in a unique position to level its withering gaze at both the city and county commission for allowing zoning changes and permitting sought by their “most important audience”: the South Florida builders lobby.
Where Mr. Lewis’ optimism falls short is in assessing the massive dislocation of resources that accompanied the boom and now bust: the unallocated and unfunded costs of growth in South Florida will severely tax current residents long into the future.
There is nothing “uncharted” about this territory: the growth model in Florida has been unsustainable for a very long time and Mr. Lewis is among its advocates: that increased tax base is good and necessary to keep pace with population growth.
Really?
If that is the case, why is Miami Dade Water and Sewer $3 billion in the hole? Why is the infrastructure backlog in Miami Dade County alone pressing on $7 billion? (Maybe Commissioner Seijas will help answer that question?)
The building boom was built, finally, on liar loans, mortgage fraud, and the incestuous relations between builders and bankers.
But the financial wizardry that shed millions of dollars in bonuses to Wall Street and bankers and developers: the game is over.
Mainstream media and paid advertisements like Miami Today had their blinders on. Mr. Lewis had the platform and the audience to make common sense arguments that might have acted as a counter-weight to the massive fraud wrapping up local elected officials, lobbyists, and their financial sponsors.
It’s hard to find a silver lining in these clouds, but it would start with explaining for business readers why consumer confidence is shakier, now, than at any time in recent history.
Perhaps, the next time that The Miami Herald gives Commissioner Seijas a soapbox, the paper could ask her to comment on her role in allowing the expansion of rock mining to intrude well within the wellfield protection zone--even when county regulators and planners had a pretty good idea that the expansion of industry and housing was putting more than a million Miami-Dade residents in harm's way.
As in benzene.
9 comments:
All of a sudden it's hip to be green. It is amusing and sad to watch anti-environment commissioners up for re-election try to re-invent their image. Commissioner Dennis Moss who led the charge to allow Florida City to annex all that sensitive land by Card Sound Road is giving away water-saving shower heads!
Seijas who says she never reads anything from "those people who buy ink by the barrell" is using free camapign space in a periodical that buys ink by the barrell to try to convince us she is a concerned environmentalist.
Commissioner Seijas has been at the forefront of sprawl, rock mining expansion, a commercial airport between 2 National Parks,
and on and on and on. She is the anti-environmentalist and no amount of "ink by the barrell" can change her track record. Hopefully the people of her district will not buy her new clothes. The emperor has no clothes.
Why DOES the herald give her that soapbox without properly covering the issue (s)..? you are a very informed individual, I love this blog,you must know the answer to that question...
She is the herald of the four horsemen of the apocalypse . . . .
Look to our archives, to learn more about Seijas, local commissioners, and mainstream media.
Here's my take on Seijas' green bumper sticker.
You've probably all watched with the same fascination as I have, how George W. Bush started to acknowledge the man-made causes of global warming, and the need to change course, once the big insurance companies and multi-nationals like GE embraced a green mission.
America's corporations are now making green themes their own, and the same is true of the building industry which, in Florida, has been at war with the environment since the first sheetrock was hammered into a 2 X 4.
Seijas is the building industry's stalking horse. It makes sense that they've asked her to "get in front" of the county's effort to keep up with what's going on around the nation.
In other words, they've seen the environmentalists' hand writing on the wall and dismissed it for decades. Now that corporate America has embraced the green theme, and now that their building boom is in cinders, Florida's builders are going to make the environmental hand writing on the wall their own.
They will applaud Seijas for holding their pencil and eraser. Like I said, I will believe Seijas has a green touch the second she rejects zoning and building permits in wetlands because of the cost and threat of sea level rise.
Since Seijas was elected, she has stood for the model of governance that maximizes building and construction at the expense of accounting for the costs of growth.
Does that make sense?
i am amused by the green washing of Natasha. She is trying to reinvent herself in the most peculiar manner. I think she sees it as a way to get National attention as she could never get before. Let her loose on the rest of the country and maybe she will leave us alone.
Crist to Rubio on the Orlando Sentinel Website:
~~~~~~~~~~~
Take that, Marco Rubio. Gov. Charlie Crist isn’t taking criticism of his energy-efficiency initiatives lying down.
On Wednesday, The Miami Herald published an op-ed piece by Florida House Speaker Marco Rubio that blasted Crist's environmental initiatives as "government mandates" that "will not only fail to achieve their desired result" but will "carry actual negative consequences" such as higher utility costs.
Rubio cited a study that estimated electricity rate hikes of 25 to 50 percent in coal-dependent states like Florida if Crist’s emissions restrictions were to become law.
Thursday morning, Crist challenged Rubio’s assertions, holding a press conference outside the governor’s mansion alongside executives of a North Florida company who announced that they are preparing to build a "biomass plant" in rural Liberty County to convert waste-wood and other forest products to electricity. The plant, they said, would drastically reduce carbon-dioxide emissions for Progress Energy, and do it without any expected new costs.
"Well, I love a healthy debate," Crist told reporters of Rubio’s assertions. "I am encouraged that he (Rubio) realizes what a big, bold, important issue this is. And that it’s innovative, and that we have to look for ways for Florida to do better."
I think we need to purchase Ms. Seijas clothes. They don't have to be green, But, I really don't care to see that particular emperoress butt bare. :O
Being an exFPL employee I was ready to challenge the “Rubio cited a study that estimated electricity rate hikes of 25 to 50 percent in coal-dependent states like Florida if Crist’s emissions restrictions were to become law.” statement. FPL has no wholly owned coal electric generation plants in Florida although it does own 20% of two units at St. Johns River Power Park (along with JEA) and 76% of unit 4 at the Robert W Scherer Power Plant a four unit coal plant in Juliette, Georgia.
With my knowledge of the FPL fuel mix I was going to challenge the dependence on coal by Rubio. With a little Google searching I found that according to the Energy Information Administration as of April 2007 Florida’s electric generation mix is:
Total Net Electricity Generation 16,443 thousand MWh
Petroleum-Fired 1,351 thousand MWh
Natural Gas-Fired 7,644 thousand MWh
Coal-Fired 4,297 thousand MWh
Nuclear 2,241 thousand MWh
Hydroelectric 18 thousand MWh
Other Renewables 322 thousand MWh
Assuming that the Net Electricity Generation number is correct (the numbers do not add up so I assume some rounding) Coal is used to generate 26% of the electricity in Florida. Also note that the cleanest fossil fuel Natural Gas generates 46% of the electricity. The FPL mix is natural gas (45 percent), nuclear (19 percent), purchased power (17 percent), oil (14 percent) and coal (5 percent).
I was surprised; I thought Florida was a relative “clean” state when it comes to electric generation. The dirty plants may not be in our back yard but they are in the state.
ex - It is always good to hear your point of view. I hope you keep coming back!
Post a Comment