Sunday, July 29, 2007

Battle for the soul of Florida by gimleteye

The Florida Chamber of Commerce has announced plans to raise as much as $65 million to fight a constitutional amendment sought by citizens supporting Florida Hometown Democracy.

The FHD measure would require that changes to local zoning plans—required by Florida law of each and every municipality and county—to first run the gauntlet of local voters before being voted on by local legislatures.

This moment in Florida history is framed by the biggest housing bust since the 1920's.

The soul of Florida is at stake in the battle by Florida Hometown Democracy against the Chamber of Commerce and the building and development lobby.

Florida’s developed landscape did not become such a point of contention, by coincidence.

But for a mortgage industry that proliferated through the use of obscure financial derivatives, multiplied from the lowly consumer or commercial mortgage, there would be no incipient rebellion by citizens.

What is visible on the ground are for-sale signs, rising taxes, tightening credit, struggling production home builders and condo developers.

What is less visible, is how the last stage of the building boom, now in cinders, used financial engineering to sell distant investors on high returns pegged to pools of underlying packages of mortgages.

The trick, now being revealed in crashing financial markets--and not just homebuilders--was in mis-marking risk by laying off low quality development against higher credit quality debt.

What Wall Street persuaded investors of financial derivatives, (too complex for all but the most sophisticated analysts to understand), goes something like this. Imagine a mutual fund (remember, this is an imaginary example) comprised of many different mortgages. Now in this fund, there are a few dogs -- strip malls in bad neighborhoods, cheap, platted subdivisions two hours from any source of work-- but on balance, the risk of having some dogs is minimized by returns the fund will generate on better quality malls and higher priced subdivisions.

Now, more than a trillion dollars of real estate investment--across the United States--is based on this premise: that the value of the fund will not be affected by the risk of default, if the dogs fail.

Put another way: Florida's growth is shaped by financial engineering based on the performance, not of better quality community design, but by the lowest common denominator.

On the ground you see strip malls and platted subdivisions by the thousands. What you don't see is how the entire financial system that depends on diversifying risk, fails to account for what people want and what people need in terms of quality of life, the environment, and principles of "sustainability".

Builders complain about their critics: "we are only building what the market wants." It's a fallacy. Builders build what bankers can finance.

And bankers, in this case Wall Street, will finance whatever generates the most commissions and bonuses for top shareholders, absent regulation.

What Florida Hometown Democracy and its amendment says, in fact, is that Floridians no longer trust either government or business to lead the way in the design and plan for growth.

And with good reason: what has government or the growth machine done to earn anything but the anger and enmity of a majority of Floridians?

In the 1920's, Florida was a sleepy and relatively empty state. When real estate markets cratered, for the most part Florida itself was intact.

80 years later, Florida is a much different place. On the issue of water alone, Florida's growth has manifestly failed to protect both public health and the environment.

It is the pressure for more growth, for instance, that is the root cause of government agencies allowing benzene to contaminate the drinking water supply for Miami-Dade.

The pressure for growth is also what caused recommendations in the most comprehensive watershed study undertaken anywhere, anytime, to be shelved by Miami-Dade county commissioners who found the whole idea of restricting growth to serve people to be distasteful in the extreme.

These stories--how the unallocated costs of growth continue to pile up in multi-billion dollar increments, even to the point of putting people in the way of cancer--could be repeated anywhere in Florida: Tampa, Jacksonville, Orlando, Pasco County, Collier or the Florida Keys.

This time, as 'for sale' signs sprout like weedy species across the state, it is manifestly clear that business interests, led by the growth machine and building lobby, have no plan, no idea, and no interest in taming the costs of growth imposed on citizens and ordinary people.

There is little question that the Florida Hometown Democracy measure will pass the test of state voters, if enough signatures and be gathered and enough money raised to communicate with Floridians.

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

What has the pro-development Chamber of Commerce done for your quality of life? Why would anyone NOT sign the Florida Hometown Democracy petition? I, for one, want a say in the master plan changes that can turn a sleepy residential area into a mega condo canyon or commercial strip mall with one vote of the County Commission. Sign the petition folks, let's get it on the ballot. Download petitions at Floridahometowndemocracy.com.

Geniusofdespair said...

there is a link on the right side of our page:
Hometown Democracy

Anonymous said...

Everyone should sign the petition. Lobbyists and insiders have taken over the land use and planning system. Time for the citizens to fight back.

Unknown said...

It seems the Florida Chamber of Commerce only cares for their Developer friends quality of life, not the people who are paying the tax bill for everyone's quality of life.

We know where the Chamber gets it's money, it's from the Developers who can't sell the homes the have on the market now, does the Chamber care if you (the home owner) can't sell yours because there is a glut of homes on the market? Of course not, all they care about are Developers, and how many homes they build and sell, but look around, do you see home sales here in Florida doing well?
They made this mess and all they want to do is build more homes, they are like a drug addict, that wants more drugs.
Residents, home owners, and renters are disgusted with the status quo, they want this change, download the petition at www.floridahometowndemocracy.com fill out the petition and vote for it, it will be the best thing you can do for the State of Florida, the Environment, and your own quality of life.

Anonymous said...

The nasties who control the big money and who only want more, more, more, have been exposed by a Moore. PLEASE if by some chance you missed SICKO. go see it now. It exposes all of the crooks and because I happen to know about much of it I can assure you it is correct and too the point. This despite what a few people who belonged to the haves prior to Castro say about it.

Anonymous said...

The Chamber of Commerce's: Floridians for Smarter Growth Inc., a political committee backed almost exclusively by home builders, opened a campaign account in April and already has collected more than $800,000 to get its measure on the 2008 ballot.
 

Anonymous said...

Since when is more democracy a bad thing? Support it!

Anonymous said...

Gimleteye is right!
Gimleteye's last paragraph....we have to start taking this petition drive more seriously. Each one of us should print out a petition and make copies and get our friends and family to sign it. And, they sure could use some money! There is a link on this blog under South Florida News links...Hometown Democracy.

Anonymous said...

I would say this was a good idea but it puts decisions in the hands of voters. Voters elected George W Bush. Twice. Nuff said.... Votes in this country cant be trusted.

Anonymous said...

A couple of things:

I remain unconvinced by the argument that local planning is somehow being driven by bankers in New York. Most of the development pattern of Miami-Dade County was set 30 or more years ago. Banks may prefer to see the tried and true style of development (single family homes and traditional shopping centers) but that is clearly not new. Moreover, do you really think that most people are clamoring for something else?

I also think that there is a lot of confusion about what Hometown Democracy will really mean. Those of us who favor better urban planning may find that placing plan changes in the hands of the public could be counterproductive.

A great example is the Watershed Study referenced by Gimleteye. The basic recommendation of the study was that development be concentrated along the Busway in South Dade and a new development corridor on S.W. 137 Avenue. Both of these changes would require a vote of the populace if Hometown Democracy is passed. Anyone who has been paying attention knows that all of the southern Dade municipalities have come out against the plan to intensify development along the busway.

Given the low vote counts we can expect on any of these things, guess which part of the County population will be most likely to come out to vote on a hypothetical Watershed implementation? That's right, the residents of the new south Dade cities. Does anyone believe that these people are going to vote for the implementation of the Watershed plan?

Say what you will about the issues with the current system, planning by NIMBYism writ large certainly isn't much better. The most realistic result of Hometown Democracy is to lock in current comprehensive plans. That would prevent planners from doing the kind of infill and new urbanist development we need to do.

Anonymous said...

So, let the Chamber of Commerce vote for us? That's what is happening now.

Anonymous said...

Nice try Mr Allen but the bottom line on "urbanist development" is it's just a blatant attack on older residential neighborhoods so developers can wipe out entire communities where residents have contributed with their hard earned money and time for 30 years or more. All this in the name of "progress" with local governments help. If we had a vote in the current process of development things would have slowed down because common sense would have raised flags, we wouldn't be in the predicament we are now with natural resources and the impending financial meltdown of sub primes.

Democracy is slow but it beats leaving decisions regarding our way of life to those who will not bear any burden of the mistakes made. The democratic process might make mistakes, but it can correct them. Our local governments down here in south Florida are corrupted by special interests, the residents are considered a nuisance. We are fighting a system that is geared to shut us out and that has to stop even if it means it would be "impractical".

The great thing about "those that favor urban planning" is that it sounds like great theory until it directly affects your way of life, your neighborhood or the home you have struggled to pay for, so that someone else can make a quick buck. The problem is much more complex than just correcting the mistakes of the past by wiping out communities under the guise of "urban planning".

I for one would rather trust my neighbor and respect his opinion than that of a politician who is looking to line his pockets by allowing developers to raid our communities behind the flag of "Urban planning". Our voices and votes need to be heard, they use to stand for some thing, and its time they did again with FHD before its too late.

We are willing to live with the decisions our voters make; good or bad, because most important of all, they are our decisions.

Anonymous said...

The people who argue that placing land use and zoning changes in the hands of the voters is "counter-productive" have their own self interests at hand.

Florida Hometown Democracy is our only way to fight against greedy developers and elected officials who consistently and wrongfully approve changes that affect our neighborhoods and quality of life, and who oftentimes and disrespectuflly make monkey faces at residents and voters who go before them.

I have not once seen our Hialeah council members tell the side who is asking for a land use or zoning change that they cannot speak, but I have witnessed on at least 4 occasions in two years (and I don't attend all the meetings), where residents have been told that an item is not open for public participation. This is wrong!

We also need to be concerned about the future of Hialeah Park as it pertains to its land use. The public cannot afford to lose this historic site or remaining structures.

Not all developers are bad, but most are greedy and don't live where we live. And YES, we need Florida Hometown Democracy!

I urge EVERYONE to go to www.floridahometowndemocracy.com, print the peition and mail it in. Make copies of the petition and give it to every voter you know and ask them to do the same. Go to your family, friends, co-workers, neighbors, everyone you know and convince them to sign it and mail it. Don't wait for someone else to do it. If we can each just get one extra person or a few persons to send in their petition.

If you can't access the petition, send me an e-mail and I'll be more than happy to help you out.

Florida is still part of the United States. Let's take our government back!

Milly Herrera
Hialeah, Florida
herrera101@aol.com

Anonymous said...

I use to agree with Mr. Allen, and opposed Hometown Democracy on similar grounds. However, things have changed. The real estate market is coming to a dead stop, so why encourage the cheapest form of development? The zoing already exists for higher density in urban areas right now. If you study the SF, CA case of Prop M, in the early 1990 when they had their real estate slowdown you will see that a NO growth initiative actually supported real estate investment while not making any worst already existing problems with affordable housing. The environmental arguments are very strong against the kind of growth patterns that florida developers utilize and refuse to absolutly refuse to change (developers in FL are amongst the most retrograde political actors causing most of the current problems because they refuse to support the kind of CA like government and economy we need in FL so F---k them.) Finally, with the sucess of the UDB issue here and in many parts of the industralized world I think that the tide has turned on development and it is now much harder for NIMBYs to argue for developing the greenbelt over "their" neighborhoods.