Sunday, May 13, 2007

“Sustainability” and the disintegration of meaning, by gimleteye


Yesterday, anonymous wrote: “The degradation of Weeki Wachee Springs was foretold by opponents to the construction of a cement plant just a few miles away and the widespread use of deep-well injection of treated sewage effluent. Proponents of both, naturally, said there would be no impact on the Floridan Aquifer, of which Weeki Wachee is a part.”

Weeki Wachee is in Hernando County, on Florida’s west coast. Although the county’s population would scarcely fit into one of Miami-Dade County’s municipalities, the destruction of the spring, emblematic for so much of what Florida has lost, also calls attention to another shifting baseline: how we have lost the capacity to differentiate sustainable losses from the unsustainable.

It is as though we have become tone deaf to alarm signals. So here is a test question: do Florida’s industries, like cement producers, feed the growth machine, or, does the growth machine feed Florida’s industries?

The Chamber of Commerce and industry, whether production homebuilders, banks, or cement executives, claim to be responsibly fulfilling the needs of people and what the market wants.

Under the influence of the free market our Everglades, our springs and drinking water wells serving millions of Floridians are on the brink of collapse.

It is no mystery why such tragedies are accepted by the broad public as an inadvertent consequence of a benign, even positive quest for profit.

“It’s not what you say, it’s what people hear”. That’s the title of Dr. Frank Luntz’ latest book, “Words that matter”. Dr. Luntz describes himself as “… the go-to consultant when leading companies need communication and language guidance, from General Motors to FedEx, Disney to American Express, from AT&T to Pfizer, from Kroger supermarkets to McDonald’s to the entire soft drink and motion picture industries, as well as for the US Department of Commerce, the National Association of Manufacturers and the Business Roundtable.”

The disintegration of meaning, hawked by experts in re-arranging language like Dr. Luntz, applies equally to our democracy, to our springs and aquifers, and to statements like this one “from CEMEX—the corporate parent of the facility only a few miles from Weeki Wachee Spring:

“As a global industry leader, we work to provide products of consistently high quality and reliable service to customers and communities around the world. We advance the well-being of those we serve through our unwavering focus on continuous improvement and our efforts to promote a sustainable future.”

A “sustainable future” includes the fierce resistance by cement manufacturers to mercury emission standards for their plants, encouragement by polluters of state-sponsored, governmental attacks on the Clean Water Act in the US Supreme Court to allow continued pollution of not just surface waters but aquifers, too, and lobbying the Florida legislature to soften regulations governing pollution of phosphate and nutrients discharged by industry into Florida waterways.

CEMEX, as a result of a $15 billion acquisition only a few months ago, also owns CSR Rinker and the problems it shares with other rock mining companies in illegally permitted activities near the Everglades.

CEMEX operates a huge rock mine in South Miami-Dade County that stretches from Card Sound Road all the way to the 18 Mile Stretch. It is now seeking a permit to massively expand that mine, despite accumulating evidence that rock mining in the area is speeding the salt water intrusion front from Biscayne Bay toward drinking water wells in Florida City, that serve the entire Florida Keys.

This is the growth machine at work: consuming Florida’s resources and putting taxpayers and consumers at an ever-increasing debt to service its needs.

No longer able to rely solely on aquifers fed by natural rainfall, coastal areas of Florida will soon be required to finance massively expensive desalination plants, that also require huge energy inputs.

The energy to power these desalination plants will have to be provided by Florida Power and Light, which is now trying to locate a massive new coal-fired power plant—that will emit more mercury into the atmosphere and millions of tons of carbon dioxide, too—at the edge of the Everglades.

"At FPL Group, one of the ways we’ve chosen to manage and measure our progress is by employing the concept of “sustainability.” At its core, sustainability requires demonstrated attention to, and excellence in, three key areas: economic accountability, environmental stewardship and social responsibility. Following is a review of many of our strengths, activities and strategies, using the three elements of this sustainability concept as a framework.” That's from the corporate website.

“Sustainability”--to FPL and corporate America--depends, first, on profits generated by expanding customer base and building more infrastructure to sustain more consumption.

Make no mistake: the growth machine of which we are willing taxpayers feeds industries whose continued profit depends on obliterating meaning, so that baselines will continue to shift in a miasma of pollution.

It is time for a new definition of progress before the mercury gets to all of us.

7 comments:

Geniusofdespair said...

you said:

This is the growth machine at work: consuming Florida’s resources and putting taxpayers and consumers at an ever-increasing debt to service its needs.

Excellent point!

And desal plants are not the answer. They are very expensive to run...what do you do with the waste sludge...Tampa is dependent on desal and they are not finding it so easy. And the power we will need to operate the plant that you speak of -- we will soon have a third nuclear reactor at Turkey Point -- that should make us all feel a lot safer with that Gas powered plant there as well...not.

I would rather have the aqiifer. However if we have paved over everything how is the aquifer going to get water?

Anonymous said...

Tampa:
Tampa Bay Seawater Desalination Plant, Florida, USA

Despite a troubled history, including the bankruptcy of three of the companies involved and a dispute over ownership and control which reached the Federal Courts, the Tampa Bay plant is now expected to be fully operational in early 2008 – some six years behind its original schedule.

The largest seawater desalination facility in the United States, it is intended to produce an initial 95,000m3 of water per day, with a future planned expansion to increase this by a further 37,000m3/day to help reduce the growing demand on the area's aquifers.

The original project involved the construction of the seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) plant itself, a seawater intake, concentrate discharge system, various chemical storage and dosing facilities and 24km (15 miles) of product water transmission main. It has subsequently been extended to encompass major repair and remediation work, which includes redesigning and replacing all the first-pass membranes, along with a series of modifications to the chemical facilities, the pre-treatment system, flocculation, and sedimentation.


The initial project budget was $110m, but this has now risen to an anticipated $150m – with some $29m of this additional cost being the remediation work – guaranteed against the contractor’s $36m performance bond.

Anonymous said...

Since large companies and business groups directly or indirectly make sure legislation is favorable to their narrow focus, we all suffer in the long run. Unless and until our elected officials make decisions based on quality of life for the majority of residents, the long term health of the region is threatened. We can hope that future political decisions will be based on a long term vision and not at the expense of the public.

Anonymous said...

Your comments about CEMEX have no base. I know CEMEX and its operations in the US for many years. This is a company committed to clean and efficient practices. It's a company really committed to sustainable development. And most importantly, this is a company committed to us, the workers and employees.

Anonymous said...

I believe that the "growth machine" driving the huge upswing in cement production is located a bit farther afield than Southern Florida and much closed to Beijing.

The Chinese demand for building supplies has had a drastic impact on the market for the last half decade.

There is nothing excusing any industry/individual/government that pollutes our waterways. We need to realize, however, the global nature of the demand for the concrete/aggregate products and not blame everything on the residential building boom of the last several years.

Anonymous said...

True, that international demand for concrete/ aggregate and other commodities has put pressure on suppliers. But also true: the influence of production home builders and the building lobby--which includes mfgs of concrete and aggregate products--has obliterated every other consideration by state and local legislatures, especially related to protecting quality of life and the environment.

A strong argument could be made that all the problems associated with the building boom originate in interest rate policies of the Federal Reserve and banking regulations established by the federal government/Congress.

The hands-off, laissez faire policies--and outright encouragement by Congress--of lax regulations have mightily contributed to the excesses that occurred: once the concrete pad is poured, all considerations about 'mitigating' the effects of development are moot: isn't that what the record shows in Florida?

Anonymous said...

The initial project budget was $110m, but this has now risen to an anticipated $150m –

Lucky for the tampa folks that our commissioners did not help them with the project, tampa would be looking at 500 million dollar project because of change orders.