Monday, December 04, 2006

Dumb and dumber: Miami Herald on the ‘golden age’ of traffic woes by gimleteye


The cheerleading pom-poms are out again at the Miami Herald on traffic woes afflicting our region. Do Herald executives know that, as a result, its subscribers are fleeing as fast as attendance at the Orange Bowl Parade?

Oh boy. What is it about the Herald that its leadership is persuaded that readers are too immature to face facts?

Its coverage of the recall effort of vile county commissioner Natacha Seijas has been anemic.

Here is a pitched battle by a brave group of citizens trying to pry Hialeah loose from the domination of wealthy developers for whom Hialeah is their political Bethlehem. They are spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to protect the single county commissioner most responsible for the real cause behind our traffic nightmares: Natacha Seijas.

Over a very long period of time, Commissioner Seijas spearheaded zoning decision after zoning decision to plow hundreds of thousands of new production homes in outlying areas without planning for transportation infrastructure.

How sad is it, you have to read about this connection in a blog, because the Herald won't print the facts?

And it gets worse. The underfunded Dan Ricker, in his page 3B “Watchdog Report” notes that county commissioners, paid $6000 per year, are getting rich on real estate deals, but doesn't report how. The net worth of Seijas' key ally on the county commission, Barbara Jordan, increased from $890,000 in 2004 to $1.84 million in 2005. How?

We don’t know who the cheerleaders are or what their fluff sessions at One Herald Plaza sound like, or the steady chatter from the outside that persuades executives and editors that its readers are too immature to face the ugly truths about our communities on a regular basis.

Take today's editorial, “Unclogging the roads”, for instance. What is the great opportunity for applause? “Broad support” at a recent Miami Chamber of Commerce for re-timing traffic lights, a website, and “a long list of other ideas”.

Who writes re-timing traffic lights to alleviate massive gridlock is a cause for optimism?

Then there is the obsequious letter to the editor, “Miami is in its golden age” by a writer who ‘moved to Miami from New York City less than two years ago’, as have many Miami Herald or El Nuevo Herald reporters.

Come on, Herald. Do your jobs!

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Oh my god. Natacha Seijas. I hate her and I'm not even from Miami!

Anonymous said...

Responding to Gimleteye's post today. While the Palm Beach Post may not be the bastion of truth and hard-hitting journalism either, (when compared to the Herald) today they appropriately highlighted a phenomenon influencing local development decisions in addition to crooked arrangements with commissioners and elects.

This kind of thing certainly happens in Miami-Dade and Broward as well, though they site Palm Beach County examples: Developers are buying off home owner associations and individuals within those groups to secure blessings for developments that are crippling South Florida and the whole state.

Article:
Time for crackdown on developers' quasi-bribes

Palm Beach Post Editorial

Monday, December 04, 2006

For years, developers have made deals with communities in order to get projects approved and built. Now, though, developers are making deals with individual members of communities to get around wider community opposition.

It's not unusual for builders to offer improvements such as landscaping, road work or public park space to neighborhoods to win them over. Those negotiations have taken place in the open and often have been mutually beneficial. But Palm Beach Post reporter Thomas R. Collins has been uncovering concessions that are unusual - and alarming: developers making direct cash payments to residents or neighborhood associations without public disclosure or government oversight.

Read the whole editorial here: http://www.palmbeachpost.com/search/content/opinion/epaper/2006/12/04/a14a_payoffs_edit_1204.html

I have heard of an interesting effort called Florida Hometown Democracy. Wonder if any bloggers here have some insite into this campaign? I doubt developers could buy off and woo every single voter if it came to them to decide whether a development was good or bad and worthy of approval.

Anonymous said...

Carlos Jimenez has long worked for the City of Miami and has been its well paid manager. Only when he snared his $6000 per year job as County Commissioner was he able to start an addition on his Lejeune home

Anonymous said...

Florida Hometown Democracy (floridahometowndemocracy.com)is an attempt to return zoning control to the people and for this reason will probably fail. It is a statewide petition movement to put a question on the ballot asking people if they want to vote on Master Plan changes (those are the big changes that can turn your residential area into a strip mall). Voters in the area of a proposed Master Plan change would be asked if they want the change; holy cow, ask the people! As usual, it was taken to court to stop the petition. The connected-ones lost so they asked the state legislators to make a charter change pass by 60%. Stupidly, the people voted for it. So not only does Hometown have to collect 700,000 good signatures but then it has to pass by 60%. And you think you matter?

Geniusofdespair said...

Last Anonymous: Luckily, when the people vote on ballot questions they usually do pass them with over 60%, as long as they are written in feel good language.

Here is the trick that politicians use, they put in two or three meaningless, feel good ballot questions and then they slip in the bad one. It works every time. If it sounds good, the fools vote for it.