Monday, July 05, 2010

No, on 4 campaign closely tied to developers, Republicans By Gimleteye

The following article by Dan Sweeney is from The Florida Independent, a new online news resource for Florida:

"To hear them tell it, the forces arrayed against Amendment 4 represent a broad coalition - Republicans and Democrats, environmentalists and developers, average citizens and the local governments that represent them. But an investigation of the staff and funding behind Citizens for Lower Taxes and a Stronger Economy, the main group opposing the amendment, reveals instead an organization so deeply tied to developers and the Republican Party that it simply cannot be extricated from those interests. (for rest of article, click 'read more')
Amendment 4, which would give citizens an up-or-down vote on changes to their local government’s comprehensive land use plan after those changes have been reviewed by the city or county commission, is universally opposed by developers in the state. It was originally to have been on the ballot in 2008.

“We were derailed by the Chamber [of Commerce] boys,” says Lesley Blackner, president of Florida Hometown Democracy. “Basically, they came up with a petition of their own, bought off all our petition collectors and paid a fortune for people to collect their petitions, and then dumped some 75,000 petitions on Jan. 2, 2008, knowing that on Dec. 31, the Division of Elections had directed all supervisors of elections around the state to validate petitions on a first-come-first-serve basis. So they dump all these petitions on the supervisors knowing that these would tie them up. They spent $6 or $7 million getting this off the ballot, and they say they’ll spend $15 million this time in the fall.”

Blackner, a lawyer by trade who has been trying to get the Hometown Democracy amendment on the ballot for more than six years, has been opposed by developers, and by extension the Republican Party, every step of the way. “If it’s true that the heart of our opposition is real estate developers, well, that’s the heart of the Republican Party in Florida,” Blackner says. “We’ve been opposed by John Thrasher, who ran a revocation effort against us and lied through his teeth saying it was developers who were behind the Hometown Democracy amendment.”

“The funding source of the Florida Republican Party is real estate, and they are very threatened by Hometown Democracy,” Blackner continues. “A Mason-Dixon poll taken last month showed that a majority of Republicans actually support Hometown Democracy. So the leadership is against Hometown Democracy, but not the rank and file. Once again, the elite are at odds with the people.”

The poll Blackner cites was conducted at the beginning of May, and showed that 61 percent of Floridians, including 54 percent of Republicans, supported Amendment 4. To pass, the amendment needs the approval of 60 percent of voters this November.

Even Ryan Houck, the executive director of the organization spearheading the opposition to Amendment 4, Citizens for Lower Taxes and a Stronger Economy, concedes the numbers in that recent poll. But he does not concede that it means the people are on Blackner’s side. “Colorado and Arizona both defeated measures like Amendment 4 in 2000,” he says. “They started with 80 percent support and ended with 70 percent opposition. … What remains ahead of us is a very long, very robust education campaign. With very few exceptions, those on the right, the left and anywhere else have opposed this amendment.”

Several anti-Amendment 4 organizations have cited a fundraising target of $15 million in newsletters to their memberships, including the Florida chapter of the Certified Commercial Investors Membership Institute and the Florida Chamber of Commerce.

That a majority of Republicans support the amendment leaves one wondering: Who exactly is Citizens for Lower Taxes and a Stronger Economy fighting for? As Houck explains, the organization is essentially a rebranding of Floridians for Smarter Growth, which led the fight against Amendment 4 in 2008, and of which Houck was also the executive director. That organization, in turn, was established by the Florida Chamber of Commerce and the like-minded business group Associated Industries of Florida. Then-lobbyist and current state Sen. and Republican Party of Florida chair John Thrasher lobbied for AIF, and thus Citizens’ predecessor Floridians for Smarter Growth, to kill the Hometown Democracy Amendment in 2008.

But the Citizens group maintains that its mission is of interest to all. “We don’t view this as a partisan issue,” says Houck, himself a former staffer for Republican Sen. Mel Martinez. “Take a look at our board of directors. Our president is the president of the Chamber of Commerce. But it also includes South Bay Mayor Clarence Anthony, a Democrat.”

But Houck doesn’t mention the job Anthony took upon leaving political office in 2008 — executive vice president and chief marketing officer of PBSJ, one of the largest developers in the state. The mirage of broad support plays itself out throughout Citizens’ endorsement list. For example, the environmental groups 1000 Friends of Florida (sponsored by, among others, the massive land-development company St. Joe) and the Florida Forestry Association (whose website discusses wood pulp and lumber as much as it does forest conservation) are highly touted. In all, the website lists more than 300 groups, nearly all of them city governments, chambers of commerce, developers, contractors and realtor associations.

Along with those endorsements, Citizens’ website, florida2010.org, also shows some downright scary numbers, including an estimate that the amendment would cause the loss of 267,000 jobs. This number, and the other job-killing evidence cited by Houck’s organization, come from a study by the Washington Economics Group, a consulting group that promises to “meet client objectives … through customized economic and business consulting services for corporations and institutions based in Florida and in the global economy.” The client in this case, the entity that paid for the study, was the Florida Chamber of Commerce, the same business group behind Citizens for Lower Taxes and a Stronger Economy, a fact even Houck acknowledges. Houck calls the WEG experts in their field. Blackner calls them “bought-and-paid-for hacks.”

And so it goes, down Citizens’ website, all the way down to the address at the bottom, which is that of campaign treasurer Nancy Watkins, who has been a go-to financial consultant for Florida Republicans for about a quarter of a century. She served first as a campaign treasurer for Connie Mack and then for dozens of Republican campaigns and PACs, including the Connie and Prescilla Mack Foundation and state Sen. Jeff Atwater’s Preserve the American Dream PAC.

The American Issues Project, a group funded by Swift Boat Veterans for Truth money man Harold Simmons, which ran anti-Obama ads in 2008 with murky claims about Obama’s ties to Bill Ayers, also lists Watkins’ Tampa address. “The breadth of opposition saying we need to stop Amendment 4 to save Florida’s economy is like almost no other issue I’ve seen,” Houck says. But upon closer inspection, No on 4 Democrats are developers, No on 4 environmental groups are greenwashes and No on 4 studies are produced by the very groups opposing the amendment."

4 comments:

Gimleteye said...

This LTE was printed in the Miami Herald, on June 24:



Amendment 4 gives us a voice in growth



In the June 13 story A different world for developer Terry Stiles, Stiles says ``it was easy'' to pave over Broward County. It was so easy that there isn't even a 250-acre parcel of land left to pave. Not content with having ruined Broward, Stiles is moving on -- to Miami-Dade.
Not surprisingly, Stiles opposes Hometown Democracy Amendment 4, the statewide ballot initiative this fall that will give voters more control over changes to their local master plans for growth. He was one of the sponsors of the big anti-Amendment 4 fundraiser last week that Fred Grimm discussed in his June 12 column, Fat cats hate slow-growth amendment.

Stiles and his ilk made their fortunes paving over paradise, and taxpayers got stuck with the bill. Taxpayers got the insane traffic, overbuilt sprawl, the housing meltdown, wrecked waterways and rising taxes.

Hopefully, taxpayers are connecting the dots that overdevelopment leads to higher taxes and lower quality of life. Amendment 4 will give voters the right to decide if a proposed change to the community plan is worthwhile for the community. Voters should get a seat at the table -- a chance to vote -- because we're the ones who pay the taxes and have to live with the mess. Local officials have proven incapable of protecting Florida from insane overdevelopment.

In November, Floridians have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for real change that can stop the Ponzi-scheme economy that the politicians and developers created. Vote Yes on Amendment 4 on Nov. 2. To learn more, visit www.floridahometowndemocracy.com.

LESLEY BLACKNER, president, Florida Hometown Democracy, Palm Beach

Anonymous said...

Lesley Blackner, not Alex Sink, should be running for Governor.

Anonymous said...

From the morons never learn files.

Homestead recently renamed Section 8 City or Foreclosureville is also against it with it's five DEMOCRATIC led CLOWNCIL leading the way.

http://homesteadishome.blogspot.com/2010/03/homestead-city-council-are-unanimously.html

Anonymous said...

That's right! The ENTIRE Homestead City Council is AGAINST Amendment 4.

But the last anon's math is wrong. 4 of the 5 city council members are Democrats (who support Flinn) and 1 is a Republican (who supports Bell).

This just goes to show that simply because they're Democrats, doesn't mean they'll do the "right thing." This brings up an interesting question. If almost the entire Homestead City Council is against Amendment 4 AND they support Eugene Flinn -- What is Flinn's position on Amendment 4?

There IS NOTHING about it on the "issues" section of his campaign website.

It's a fair question. After all -- Flinn -- like the members of the Homestead Council, is an incumbent elected official.

They MUST share more than just Party affiliation?